по-русски

Actual Problems
of Economics and Law

 

16+

 

DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.2.235-248

скачать PDF

Authors :
1. Vyacheslav V. Volchik, Professor, Head of the Department of Economic Theory of the Faculty of Economics
Southern Federal University

2. Igor M. Shiriaev, Associate Professor of the Faculty of Economics
Southern Federal University



Distant higher education under self-isolation and the problem of institutional traps


Objective: to reveal the consequences of the transition to total distance education in the Russian higher education under self-isolation caused by the spread of the new coronavirus.
 
Methods: qualitative methods, narrative analysis, in-depth interviews, included observation.
 
Results: the process of transition to distance education with a view to combat the spread of the new coronavirus infection in Russia in 2020 is a unique example of simultaneous implementation of institutional and technological innovations. The analysis of this phenomenon requires using the ideas of institutional and evolutionary economic theory, as well as narrative economics and the Austrian school. To determine the main patterns of emergence and strengthening of institutional traps that arise under self-isolation in the higher education system, the authors analyzed the narratives and in-depth interviews of the main actors. In addition, a certain part of the conclusions is formulated based on the included observation of the authors as typical representatives of the higher education sphere. The conducted research allowed identifying the main patterns of the current total introduction of distance technologies in the Russian higher education. It is stated that institutional and technological evolution can lead to the selection and consolidation of inefficient institutions and technologies under the influence of increasing returns. The widespread introduction of distance education demonstrates its defects. Based on the analysis of the results of in-depth interviews, conclusions about the main institutional problems of the educational process digitalization are formulated. Distance education is not a full-fledged substitute for the traditional education, as it impedes the transfer of implicit knowledge, control and feedback during training, ambiguously influences the costs of educational activities, and does not allow relying on the reliability of information and communication technologies. Transition to distant education can be interpreted as a new stage of evoluton of the institutional trap of electronization and digitalization.
 
Scientific novelty: consists in identifying the qualitative characteristics of the process of implementing total distance education while combating the spread of the new coronavirus infection in Russia.
 
Practical significance: is determined by the need to understand the causes of inefficiency and aggravation of contradictions between different groups of actors in the field of education and science while combating the spread of the new coronavirus infection.

Keywords :
Economics and national economy management; Institutional Economics; Distance education; Digitalization of
education; Higher education; Self-Isolation; Institutional traps

Bibliography :
1. Vol'chik V. V., Koryttsev M. A., Maslyukova E. V. Institutional traps and new managerism in the sphere of education and science, Upravlenets, 2018, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 17–29 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2018-9-6-2
2. Nelson R. R. Bringing Institutions into Evolutionary Growth Theory, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2002, Vol. 12, No. 1–2, pp. 17–28. DOI:10.1007/s00191-002-0108-x
3. Polterovich V. M Institutional traps and economic reforms, Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody, 1999, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 3–20 (in Russ.).
4. Balatskii E. V. Dissertation trap, Svobodnaya mysl', 2005, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 92–104 (in Russ.).
5. Vol'chik V. V., Maslyukova E. V. Metrics trap, or why implicit knowledge is underestimated when regulating the sphere of education and science, Journal of Institutional Studies (Zhurnal institutsional'nykh issledovanii), 2018, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 158–179 (in Russ.). DOI: 10(3).10.17835/2076-6297.2018.10.3.158-179
6. Markey-Towler B. The Competition and Evolution of Ideas in the Public Sphere: a New Foundation for Institutional Theory, Journal of Institutional Economics, 2019, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 27–48. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137418000061
7. Shiller R. J. Narrative Economics: How Stories Go Viral and Drive Major Economic Events, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2019. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvdf0jm5
8. Hayek F. A. The Fatal Conceit. The Errors of Socialism, Moscow, Novosti, 1992 (in Russ.).
9. David P. A. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY, The American Economic Review, 1985, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 332–337.
10. Arthur W. B. Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events, The Economic Journal, 1989, Vol. 99, No. 394, pp. 116–131. DOI: 10.2307/2234208
11. Arthur W. B. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Michigan, The University of Michigan Press, 1994. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.10029
12. Kvale S. Research interview, Moscow, Smysl, 2003 (in Russ.).
13. Beiker R., Brik Dzh. M., Beits N., Battal'ya M., Kuper M., Dever Dzh., Gail K., Turanzho R. Report of AAPOR working group on nonrandom samples: June 2013, Moscow: Obshcherossiiskii obshchestvennyi fond "Obshchestvennoe mnenie", 2016 (in Russ.).
14. Hammersley M., Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice, London; New York, Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2007.
15. Kawulich B.B. Participant Observation as a Data Collection Method, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2005, Vol. 6, No. 2, available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/466/996 (access date: 20.04.2020).
16. Rezerford M. Field, secret and participant observers in the American economy of labor: 1900–1930, Terra Economicus, 2012, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 91–106 (in Russ.).
17. Devyatko I. F. Methods of sociological research, Ekaterinburg, Izd-vo Ural'skogo universiteta, 1998 (in Russ.).
18. Zhuk A. A., Fursa E. V. Narrative analysis of institutional traps in the sphere of education and science in Russia, Journal of Institutional Studies (Zhurnal institutsional'nykh issledovanii), 2019, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 176–193 (in Russ.).
19. Bagus Ph. Calls for Central Planning in the COVID-19 Panic Are like the Calls for the «War Socialism» of Old, Mises Institute, 2020, available at: https://mises.org/wire/calls-central-planning-covid-19-panic-are-calls-war-socialism-old (access date: 14.04.2020).
20. Stiglitz J. E. Unemployment and Innovation, NBER Working Paper, No. 20670, 2014, available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w20670.pdf (access date: 20.04.2020).
21. Bowles N. Human Contact Is Now a Luxury Good, The New York Times, 23.03.2019, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/23/sunday-review/human-contact-luxury-screens.html (access date: 20.04.2020).
22. Whitehead J. W. Life in the Electronic Concentration Camp: The Many Ways That You’re Being Tracked, Catalogued and Controlled, LewRockwell.com, 2014, available at: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/01/john-w-whitehead/life-in-the-electronicconcentration-camp/ (access date: 20.04.2020).
23. Vol'chik V. V. Evolution of post-industrial economy institutions in the context of Veblenian Dichotomy, Terra Economicus, 2008, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 53–65 (in Russ.).
24. Waller W. T. The Evolution of the Veblenian Dichotomy: Veblen, Hamilton, Ayres, and Foster, Journal of Economic Issues, 1982, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 757–771. DOI: 10.1080/00213624.1982.11504031
25. Lovink G. Social media abyss: Critical Internet cultures and the force of negation, Cambridge; Malden, Polity, 2016.
26. Beer D. Metric Power, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-55649-3
27. Vol'chik V. V., Maslyukova E. V. Reforms, implicit knowledge and institutional traps in the sphere of education and science, Terra Economicus, 2019, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 146–162 (in Russ.).
28. Wajcman J. Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2015. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226196503.001.0001
29. Vol'chik V. V. Reforming the Russian system of higher education: role of myths and institutions, Terra Economicus, 2013, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 94–103 (in Russ.).
30. Vol'chik V. V. Institutional traps in the sphere of education and science under optimization, Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii, 2019, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 783–795 (in Russ.).
31. Zoom is jeopardized again, Kommersant", 12.04.2020, available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4320590?utm_source=yxnews&utm_medium=desktop&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fyandex.ru%2Fnews (access date: 12.04.2020) (in Russ.).
32. Vol'chik V. V., Berezhnoi I. V. Selection and exaptation of institutions: role of special interest groups, Evolyutsionnaya i institutsional'naya ekonomicheskaya teoriya, Saint Petersburg, Aleteiya, 2012, pp. 165–187 (in Russ.).

Citation :
Volchik V. V., Shiriaev I. M. Distant higher education under self-isolation and the problem of institutional traps, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2020, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 235–248 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.2.235-248

Type of article : The scientific article

Date of receipt of the article :
24.04.2020

Date of adoption of the print :
23.05.2020

Date of online accommodation :
25.06.2020