по-русски

Actual Problems of
Economics and Law

 

16+

 

DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.1.948-965

скачать PDF

Authors :
1. Elena A. Buranova, Lecturer of the Department of Financial Management
Kazan Innovative University named after V. G. Timiryasov



Conceptual model of the process of rehabilitating institutional anti-crisis management of enterprises


Objective: to develop the stages of rehabilitation anti-crisis management of an enterprise in order to improve the quality of anti-crisis management in general.


Method: abstract-logical.


Results: the need to study and implement crisis management is due to insufficient development of issues related to the formation of a set of measures to support enterprises surviving crisis. It is determined that the development of such measures can be based on rehabilitation mechanisms used in various fields. The developed stages of rehabilitation crisis management are in close relationship with the areas of preventive and reactive crisis management. Rehabilitation anti-crisis management is considered not only for the enterprise which overcame a crisis situation, but also for bankrupt enterprises. The increased corporate social responsibility and the company reputation management are studied as elements of institutional and economic rehabilitation of an enterprise. It is proposed to form the strategy of development of the enterprise within rehabilitation anticrisis management, instead of preventive management. The authors describe further prospects of the enterprise development depending on the implemented process of self-improvement at the enterprise and substantiate the importance of rehabilitation procedures for increasing the efficiency of anti-crisis management.


Scientific novelty: the article for the first time reveals in detail the content of each stage of rehabilitation anti-crisis management of an enterprise; describes all the interrelations between them; substantiates the importance of the key actions during each stage of rehabilitation anti-crisis management.


Practical significance: implementation of the proposed new stages of rehabilitation anti-crisis management will give a second chance to some entrepreneurs declared bankrupt; using the strategic management tools, it will be possible to ensure anti-crisis sustainability long-term; to lay the need for self-improvement in the foundation of all enterprises’ functioning, making it a natural and necessary element.


Keywords :

Economics and national economy management; Rehabilitation anti-crisis management; Recovery procedures; Stages of rehabilitation of an enterprise


Bibliography :

1. Manushin D. V. Estimating the anti-crisis plan of the Russian government for 2015 and elaborating measures for improving it, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2015, No. 3, pp. 45–54. DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.09.2015.3.45-54 (in Russ.).
2. Manushin D. V. Estimating the anti-crisis plans of the Russian government for 2015 and 2016 and improving the plan of the Russian government of providing sustainable social-economic development of Russia in 2016, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2016, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 5–27. DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.10.2016.3.5-27 (in Russ.).
3. Manushin D. V. Anti-crisis plans of the Russian government of 19 January 2017: estimations, prospects and measures for improvement, Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost', 2017, Vol. 13, No. 12, pp. 2291–2311. DOI: 10.24891/ni.13.12.2291 (in Russ.).
4. Ryakhovskaya A. N., Kovan S. E. Transformation of anti-crisis management under modern economic conditions, Effektivnoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie, 2013, No. 5 (80), pp. 62–73 (in Russ.).
5. Buranova E. A. Review. On anti-crisis management at an enterprise, Obshchestvo i ekonomika, 2016, No. 8, pp. 111–133 (in Russ.).
6. Amas'yants R. A. Strategy of organization and management of comprehensive rehabilitation and prevention in the Russian Federation, Chelovecheskii capital, 2014, No. 6, pp. 33–37 (in Russ.).
7. Efimova O. V. External management as a type of rehabilitative bankruptcy procedure, Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo zakonodatel'stva, 2016, No. 14, pp. 42–46 (in Russ.).
8. Kochetkov E. P. Increasing the efficiency of rehabilitative potential of bankruptcy procedures in Russia, Strategii biznesa, 2017, No. 2, pp. 25–29. DOI: 10.17747/2311-7184-2017-2-25-29 (in Russ.).
9. L'vova O. A. Anti-crisis potential of bankruptcy, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, Ser. 21: Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo), 2016, No. 4, pp. 79–104 (in Russ.).
10. Rudenko E. I., Stepanov I. G., Novoselov D. A., Vladimirova M. P. On the efficiency of rehabilitative insolvency procedures, Audit i finansovyi analiz, 2016, No. 6, pp. 218–221 (in Russ.).
11. Ryakhovskaya A. N. Directions of increasing the efficiency of the bankruptcy institution, MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie), 2016, Vol. 7, No. 2 (26), pp. 35–42 (in Russ.).

12. Uman' I. N. Financial improvement as a rehabilitative procedure; conditions, order and procedural problems of its implementation for juridical persons’ bankruptcy, Rossiiskii sud'ya, 2010, No. 5, pp. 34–37 (in Russ.).
13. Ansoff I. Strategic management, Moscow, Ekonomika, 1989, 519 p. (in Russ.).
14. Petak W. J. Emergency management: A challenge for public administration, Public Administration Review,  1985, Vol. 45, pp. 3–7. DOI: 10.2307/3134992
15. Mitroff I. I. Crisis management: Cutting through the confusion, MIT Sloan Management Review, 1988, Vol. 29, No. 2, p. 15.
16. Augustine N. R. Managing the crisis you tried to prevent, Harvard Business Review, 1995, Vol. 73, No. 6, pp. 147–158.
17. Hensgen T., Desouza K. C., Kraft G. D. Games, signal detection, and processing in the context of crisis management, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2003, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 67–77. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.1102003
18. Coombs W. T. Protecting organization reputation during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory, Corporate Reputation Review, 2007, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 163–176. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
19. Coombs W. T. Crisis management and communications, Institute for public relations, 2007, Vol. 4, No. 5, p. 6.
20. Ryakhovskaya A. N., Kovan S. E. Anti-crisis management as the basis for forming a mechanism of sustainable development of business, Moscow, NITs INFRA-M, 2016, 169 p. (in Russ.).
21. Arsenova E. V., Kryukova O. G., Ryakhovskaya A. N. Foreign practice of anti-crisis management, Moscow, Magistr, INFRA-M, 2016, 272 p. (in Russ.).
22. Rubanova K. A. Anti-crisis management and anti-crisis restructuring: interaction and difference between the notions, Vestnik IEAU, 2015, No. 6, pp. 1–4 (in Russ.).
23. Ryakhovskaya A. N., Kovan S. E. Transformation of anti-crisis management under moern economic conditions, Effektivnoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie, 2013, No. 5 (80), pp. 62–73 (in Russ.).
24. Manushin D. V. New view at the notion of “crisis”, Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika, 2013, No. 15, pp. 17–24 (in Russ.).
25. Manushin D. V. True causes of global economic crises and their influence on the Russian economy, Finansy i kredit, 2014, No. 42, pp. 52–70 (in Russ.).
26. Manushin D. V. Review, summarization and assessment of the theories of economic cycles and crises. Identification and comparison of new theories: of political-economic conditional cycle and of infinite crisis, Finansy i kredit, 2016, No. 2, pp. 9–26 (in Russ.).
27. Manushin D. V. Anti-crisis management in macroeconomic systems: theoretical aspects, Kazan, Kazanskii innovatsionnyi universitet im. V. G. Timiryasova, 2016, 268 p. (in Russ.).
28. Grynchyshyn Y. Evolution of European approach to using financial restructuring in the system of crisis management of enterprises, Economic Annals-XXI, 2016, Vol. 156, No. 1–2, pp. 63–66. DOI: 10.21003/ea.v156-0014
29. Manushin D. V. Specifying the essence of tax contradiction and measures to reduce it under crisis: struggle against shadow economy and transition to fair taxation rules, Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet, 2018, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 103–120. DOI: 10.24891/ia.21.1.103 (in Russ.).
30. Magomedov A. M. Institutional environment as a factor of regional economy development, Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal, 2013, Vol. 20, pp. 13–50 (in Russ.).
31. Dorofeeva V. V. Methodology of factor assessment of the environment influence on performance of enterprises, Diskussiya, 2013, No. 5–6 (35–36), pp. 62–67 (in Russ.).
32. Il'kevich S. V., Shlapak V. S. Interdisciplinary approach to anti-crisis management: recent trends in foreign research, Servis Plus, 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 51–65 (in Russ.).
33. Manushin D. V. Assessing and managing the motivation problems of the Russian state servants under crisis, Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost', 2016, No. 7, pp. 17–35 (in Russ.).
34. Manushin D. V. Anti-crisis state management of the Russian economy: institutional approach, Finansy i kredit, 2014, No. 3, pp. 23–34 (in Russ.).
35. Manushin D. V. Problems of anti-corruption and anti-crisis management of the Russian economy and measures to solve them: institutional aspect, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2014, No. 1, pp. 56–65. DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.08.2014.1.56-65 (in Russ.).
36. Qijun J., Cong Z. An Empirical Study on the Crisis Management about Food Enterprises Based on Corporate Social Responsibility, 2008.
37. Mio C., Fasan M. Does Corporate Social Performance Yield Any Tangible Financial Benefit During a Crisis? An Event Study of Lehman Brothers, Corporate Reputation Review, 2012, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 263–284. DOI: 10.1057/crr.2012.16
38. Tret'yakova E. P. Corporate social responsibility: lecture course, 2015, available at: http://www.studfiles.ru/preview/3579329 (access date: 05.07.2017) (in Russ.).

39. Pang A. Towards a crisis preemptive image management model, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 2012, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 358–378.
40. Dubov P. A., Rol'bina E. S., Keveyan R. S. Forming the corporate image, Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii, 2014, No. 1, pp. 12–17 (in Russ.).
41. Grigor'eva O. V., Yakovleva E. L., Grigor'eva N. S. et al. Economic psychology: scientific essays, Kazan, Poznanie, 2016, 200 p. (in Russ.).
42. Leshchinskaya A. V. Comparative analysis of bankruptcy procedure in Russia and Germany, Vestnik instituta mirovykh tsivilizatsii, 2017, No. 14, pp. 121–126 (in Russ.).
43. Tyankova Ya. T. Court procedure in cases of insolvency (bankruptcy) by the Bulgarian law and contemporary trends of developing the insolvency institution in the European Union, Human rights: theory and practice: Collection of scientific papers / ed. By M. Dei, London, 2017, pp. 147–150 (in Russ.).
44. Kruglova N. Yu. Anti-crisis management, Moscow, KNORUS, 2009, 512 p. (in Russ.).


Citation :

Buranova E. A. Conceptual model of the process of rehabilitating institutional anti-crisis management of enterprises, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2019, vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 948–965 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.1.948-965


Type of article : The scientific article

Date of receipt of the article :
14.09.2018

Date of adoption of the print :
20.01.2019

Date of online accommodation :
25.03.2019