по-русски

Actual Problems of
Economics and Law

 

16+

 

DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.4.1549-1562

скачать PDF

Authors :
1. Leonid A. Bogunov, PhD (Psychology), doctoral applicant of the Department of Innovative Development Economics of the Faculty of Public Administration
Lomonosov Moscow State University



Developing the knowledge of one’s own labor activity as a factor of an employee’s economic security


Objective: to disclosure of conceptual aspects of the competence of managing an employee’s economic security from the viewpoint of developing one’s knowledge of labor activity.


Methods: to achieve the goal and solve the set tasks, we used elements of dialectical, system, competence approaches and, accordingly, methods of system analysis and synthesis, the method of formalization, and the principle of development.


Results: under digitalization of economic processes, the increased role of competencies and skills of personnel, the problem of threat to economic security of employees is aggravated. At the same time, human capital becomes the leading resource in the knowledge economy. Based on the analysis of the theoretical provisions of labor theory, as well as aspects of the theory of human capital and knowledge management, the concept of knowledge of the employee's own labor activity (KEOLA) is formulated. In the context of the existing trends of understanding the phenomenon of economic security and the theory of marginal utility, as well as the proposed KEOLA concept, the notion of economic security of an employee is formulated. It is determined that KEOLA develops in the process of labor activity of an individual, and the vector of development depends on the conditions of labor experience acquisition. A modern employee must learn to manage the utility of one’s own knowledge, which is understood as KEOLA moving from the state of quasi-formalized to para-formalized knowledge in the aspect of determining its general and ultimate utility. It is established that the ability to control the knowledge utility increases through knowledge formalization.


Scientific novelty: for the first time, the article reveals the conceptual aspects of the competence management of economic security of an employee from the viewpoint of KEOLA development in the aspect of general and marginal utility of one’s knowledge, which is especially important in the context of current trends of economy digitalization and employment robotization.


Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used, first, for the further theoretical development of substantive aspects of competence of economic security management of an employee, and second, as targets in the training of modern specialists as competent employment actors under knowledge economy.


Keywords :

Socio-economic aspects of higher education development; Economic security; Human capital; Employee; Labor activity; Knowledge; Competence; Utility; Development; Management


Bibliography :

1. Bogunov L. A. Developing modern economic thinking in education as a priority of national economy, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2011, No. 3 (19), pp. 5–9 (in Russ.).


2. Bogunov L. A. Innovative aspects in individual economic thinking: aspects of content, formation and development, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2012, No. 3 (23), pp. 5–10 (in Russ.).


3. Klimova A. N. Key approaches to researching the notions “economic security” and “economic security of the state”, Sotsial'noekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy, 2014, No. 8 (9), pp. 54–60 (in Russ.).


4. Lebedeva E. O., Bragina Z. V. Economic security: innovative context, Karavaevo, Kostromskaya GSKhA, 2016, 131 p. (in Russ.).


5. Plotnikov N. V. Providing economic security of higher education: theoretical and methodological aspects, abstract of Doctoral (Economics) thesis, Saint Petersburg, 2016, 40 p. (in Russ.).


6. Chekmarev V. V., Chekmarev Vl. V. Noospherism of the philosophy of economy and economic security theory (to the 80th anniversary of A. I. Subetto), Filosofiya khozyaistva, 2017, No. 1 (109), pp. 265–274 (in Russ.).


7. Chernov S. B. Economic security theory in the context of achievements of various economic schools, Vestnik universiteta, 2016, No. 7–8, pp. 112–118 (in Russ.).


8. Bykovskaya Yu. V. Substantiating the economic essence of social policy in the interests of economic security, Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika, 2015, No. 39, pp. 44–55 (in Russ.).


9. Daskovskii V., Kiselev V. On the strategy of economic security and social-economic development, Ekonomist, 2018, No. 3, pp. 24–44 (in Russ.).


10. Shvaiba D. N. On the issue of social-economic security of a state, Trud i sotsial'nye otnosheniya, 2017, No. 3, pp. 19–24 (in Russ.).

 

11. Alonkina L. I. State regulation of labor market in the context of providing the economic security of Russia, abstract of Doctoral (Economics) thesis, Moscow, 2008, 49 p. (in Russ.).


12. Druzhkova V. N., Gryaznova N. L. Analysis and assessment of the state of labor resources determining the personnel security as a constituent of economic security of an organization, Tekhnika i tekhnologiya pishchevykh proizvodstv, 2017, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 133–141 (in Russ.).


13. Kireev V. E. Evolution of approaches to researching labor productivity in the context of economic security, Ekonomicheskii zhurnal, 2015, No. 2 (38), pp. 6–12 (in Russ.).


14. Savina T. N. Unemployment as an indicator of economic security in the sphere of employment: regional aspect, Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika, 2018, No. 17 (2), pp. 217–231 (in Russ.).


15. Kolyadin A. P. Fictitious component of human capital as a systemic element of knowledge economy, Doctoral (Economics) thesis, Pyatigorsk, 2012, 362 p. (in Russ.).


16. Ginesti G., Caldarelli A., Zampella A. Exploring the impact of intellectual capital on company reputation and performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2018, Vol. 19, No. 5, рр. 915–934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-01-2018-0012

17. Kondaurova I. A., Kuznetsova A. M. Conception of individualized management of human capital of an organization, Drukerovskii vestnik, 2018, No. 1 (21), pp. 163–172 (in Russ.).


18. Pueyo F., Sanso M. Technological change, human capital update and growth policies, Spanish Economic Review, 2005, Vol. 73, No. 1, рр. 23–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10108-004-0093-3


19. Tian F., Chen L. Unequal at the college door, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2018, Vol. 38, No. 11/12, рр. 1041–1056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-03-2018-0050


20. Calic G., Hélie S., Bontis N., Mosakowski E. Creativity from paradoxical experience: a theory of how individuals achieve creativity while adopting paradoxical frames, Journal of Knowledge Management, 2019, Vol. 23, No. 3, рр. 397–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2018-0223


21. Suslov D. S. Knowledge management at various stages of an organization life cycle, PhD (Economics) thesis, Moscow, 2014, 179 p. (in Russ.).


22. Teslinova E. A. Elaborating methodology of forming a system of knowledge management system in automated information environment of an organization: by the example of ERP-system, abstract of PhD (Economics) thesis, Moscow, 2007, 18 p. (in Russ.).

23. Batarseh F. S., Usher J. M., Daspit J. J. Absorptive capacity in virtual teams: examining the influence on diversity and innovation, Journal of Knowledge Management, 2017, Vol. 21, No. 6, рр. 1342–1361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2016-0221


24. Trusson C., Hislop D., Doherty N. F. The rhetoric of “knowledge hoarding”: a research-based critique, Journal of Knowledge Management, 2017, Vol. 21, No. 6, рр. 1540–1558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2017-0146


25. Bakulin A. A. Developing a knowledge management system in the process of innovative activity of industrial enterprises, abstract of PhD (Economics) thesis, Moscow, 2015, 24 p. (in Russ.).


26. Goryainova T. P. Developing educational services based on knowledge management, abstract of PhD (Economics) thesis, Saint Petersburg, 2014, 18 p. (in Russ.).


27. Huang Y., Chin Y. Transforming collective knowledge into team intelligence: the role of collective teaching, Journal of Knowledge Management, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 6, рр. 1243–1263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2017-0106

28. Oh S. Effects of organizational learning on performance: the moderating roles of trust in leaders and organizational justice, Journal of Knowledge Management, 2019, Vol. 23, No. 2, рр. 313–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2018-0087

29. Prieto-Pastor I., Martín-Pérez V., Martí n-Cruz N. Social capital, knowledge integration and learning in project-based organizations: a CEO-based study, Journal of Knowledge Management, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 8, рр. 1803–1825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2017-0210


30. Wang J., Tarn D. Are two heads better than one? Intellectual capital, learning and knowledge sharing in adyadic interdisciplinary relationship, Journal of Knowledge Management, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 6, рр. 1379–1407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2017-0145


31. Marx K. Capital: the critique of political economy, In 3 vol., Moscow, Eksmo, 2011 (in Russ.).


32. Ricardo D. Principles of political economy and taxation: selected works, Moscow, Eksmo, 2009, 953 p. (in Russ.).

33. Smith A. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Saint Petersburg, Azbuka, 2019, 540 p. (in Russ.).


34. Say J.-B. A Treatise on Political Economy, Moscow, Direkt-Media, 2007, 67 p. (in Russ.).


35. Mises L. von. Human action: A Treatise on Economics, Chelyabinsk, Sotsium, 2005, 975 p. (in Russ.).


36. Schumpeter J. A. The theory of economic development. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy, Moscow, Eksmo, 2008, 864 p. (in Russ.).


37. Nonaka I., Takeuchi Kh. Company as a creator of knowledge: generation and development of innovations in Japanese companies, Moscow, ZAO "Olimp-Biznes", 2011, 366 p. (in Russ.).

 

38. Burnette М. Tacit knowledge sharing among library colleagues: a pilot study, Reference Services Review, 2017, Vol. 45, No. 3, рр. 382–397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-11-2016-0082


39. Dima A. M., Vasilache S. Social network analysis for tacit knowledge management in universities, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2015, Vol. 6, No. 4, рр. 856–864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-013-0151-x


40. Rosário C. R., Kipper L. M., Frozza R., Mariani B. B. Methodology for acquisition of collective tacit knowledge used in diagnosis of defect cause in industrial processes, VINE, 2015, Vol. 45, No. 1, рр. 22–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/VINE-03-2013-0013

41. Gubenskii E. F., Korableva G. V., Lutchenko V. A. Philosophic encyclopedic dictionary, Moscow, INFRA-M, 2005, 576 p. (in Russ.).


42. Bohm-Bawerk E. von. Selected works on value, interest and capital, Moscow, Eksmo, 2009, 909 p. (in Russ.).


43. Walras L. Elements of Pure Economics, or The Theory of Social Wealth, Moscow, Universitet. b-ka, Ekonomika, 2000, 421 p. (in Russ.).


44. Menger K. Selected works, Moscow, Izdatel'skii dom “Territoriya budushchego”, 2005, 496 p. (in Russ.).


45. Pareto V. Manual of Political Economy, Moscow, INFRA-M, 2018, 591 p. (in Russ.).


Citation :

Bogunov L. A. Developing the knowledge of one’s own labor activity as a factor of an employee’s economic security, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2019, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 1549–1562 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.4.1549-1562


Type of article : The scientific article

Date of receipt of the article :
25.07.2019

Date of adoption of the print :
12.10.2019

Date of online accommodation :
25.12.2019