скачать PDF
Authors : 1. Valentina Mikhailovna Bolshakova,
PhD (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law of Nizhniy Novgorod Institute for Management
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Review of the dissertation by S. I. Cherepanov “Comparative-legal study of the jury institution in the Russian Empire according to the 1864 judicial reform and the advocacy institution in the Russian Federation” (Nizhniy Novgorod, 2018. 192 p.)
Objective: to comprehensively and objectively assess the dissertation by S. I. Cherepanov “Comparative-legal study of the jury institution in the Russian Empire according to the 1864 judicial reform and the advocacy institution in the Russian Federation”, defended in Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs in 2019.
Methods: method of complex analysis of scientific text, methodology of chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal research.
Results: the paper presents the author’s conception of chrono-discrete development of the advocacy in Russia, focusing on the theoretical merits of the work and the author’s practical recommendations for improving the advocacy institution in the Russian Federation. In the first chapter, the author examines advocacy as chrono-discrete Russian institution, explores the normative base of the advocacy functioning in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation, as well as the periodization of the advocacy history in Russia. The second chapter is devoted to the analysis of the legal status and corporate structure of the jury and advocacy in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation, as well as the advocacy functions in the pre-revolutionary and modern periods. At the same time, there are some criticisms of the applicant’s work. In general, it is concluded that the reviewed work is written at a high level, meets all the requirements for PhD theses, and its author deserves the PhD (Law) degree.
Scientific novelty: for the first time, a comprehensive assessment is given to S. I. Cherepanov’s dissertation “Comparativelegal study of the jury institution in the Russian Empire according to the 1864 judicial reform and the advocacy institution in the Russian Federation”.
Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in scientific, pedagogical and legislative activities in the consideration and study of issues related to the advocacy.
Keywords :
Review; Dissertation; Jury; Advocacy; Lawyer; 1864 reform; the Russian Empire; Chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal research
Bibliography :
1. Cherepanov S. I. Comparative-legal study of the jury institution in the Russian Empire according to the 1864 judicial reform and the advocacy institution in the Russian Federation, PhD (Law) thesis, Nizhny Novgorod, 2018, 192 p. (in Russ.).
2. Cherepanov S. I. Comparative-legal study of the jury institution in the Russian Empire according to the 1864 judicial reform and the advocacy institution in the Russian Federation, abstract of PhD (Law) thesis, Nizhny Novgorod, 2018, 32 р. (in Russ.).
3. Demichev A. A. Principles and development prospects of the scientific domain “Chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal studies”, Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2016, No. 1, pp. 23–28 (in Russ.).
4. Bol'shakova V. M. Methodology of chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal studies in studying judicial reforms in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation, Rossiiskii zhurnal pravovykh issledovanii, 2018, No. 4, pp. 45–50 (in Russ.).
5. Demichev A. A. On the object of chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal studies, Topical issues and development prospects of the scientific school of chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal studies, collection of works by the materials of the 1st All-Russia scientific conference, ed. A. A. Demichev, K. A. Demichev, Nizhny Novgorod, NIU RANKhiGS, 2018, pp. 9–21 (in Russ.).
6. Demichev A. A. NEP period in the Russian history through the prism of chrono-discrete approach, Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2018, No. 3, pp. 62–64 (in Russ.).
7. Demichev A. A. Issues of studying legal succession in chrono-discrete monogeographical research, Yuridicheskaya tekhnika, 2011, No. 5, pp. 160–165 (in Russ.).
8. Demichev K. A. Nizhniy Novgorod and its state-legal institutions through the prism of scientific school of chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal studies, Nizhniy Novgorod region and development of Russia: past, present, future, collection of works of scientific conferences and round tables, Nizhny Novgorod, NIU RANKhiGS, 2018, pp. 54–57 (in Russ.).
9. Demichev K. A. Nature and features of a chrono-gap in the context of methodological principles of the chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal studies, Topical issues and development prospects of the scientific school of chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal studies, collection of works by the materials of the 1st All-Russia scientific conference, ed. A. A. Demichev, K. A. Demichev, Nizhny Novgorod, 2018, рр. 22–30 (in Russ.).
10. Demichev K. A. Problems and prospects of using the methodology of the chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal studies methodology in Oriental comparative-legal research, Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2016, No. 2 (34), pp. 67–72 (in Russ.).
11. Demichev K. A. Specific-legal research in the context of methodological bases of the scientific school of the chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal studies, Uchenye zapiski, Vol. 16, N. Novgorod, 2018, pp. 38–44 (in Russ.).
12. Bol'shakova V. M. Jury in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation as a civil society institution, Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2018, No. 1, pp. 10–13 (in Russ.).
13. Bol'shakova V. M. Jury: chrono-discrete Russian institution, Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo, 2017, No. 3, pp. 11–14 (in Russ.).
14. Demichev A. A. Comparative-legal research of the jury in Russia (history and modernity), abstract of doctoral (Law) thesis, Nizhny Novgorod, 2003 (in Russ.).
15. Ilyukhin A. V. Limiting the authority of the jury in the sphere of state crimes in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation: comparative-legal aspect, Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2016, No. 3 (35), pp. 32–36 (in Russ.).
16. Ilyukhin A. V., Ilyukhina V. A., Vezenova P. R. Military jury in Russia as an object of chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal studies, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2018, No. 427, pp. 201–207 (in Russ.).
17. Volosatykh E. A. Chrono-discrete historical-theoretical research of the legal status of magistrate in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation, abstract of PhD (Law) thesis, Nizhny Novgorod, 2016 (in Russ.).
18. Ilyukhina V. A. Forming the magistrate institution in the Russian Empire and in the modern Russia: experience of comparativelegal research, Mirovoi sud'ya, 2010, No. 4, pp. 7–11 (in Russ.).
19. Ilyukhina V. A., Volosatykh E. A. Incentives to magistrate in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation (chrono-discrete analysis), Mirovoi sud'ya, 2019, No. 3, pp. 3–7 (in Russ.).
20. Bol'shakova V. M. Prosecutor’s office as a chrono-discrete Russian institution, Voprosy rossiiskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava, 2018, Vol. 8, No. 6A, pp. 12–18 (in Russ.).
21. Nikonov V. A. Comparative-legal research of the Prosecutor’s office institution in Russia in the second half of the 19th – beginning of the 20th c and in the end of the 20th – beginning of the 21st c, PhD (Law) thesis, Vladimir, 2005 (in Russ.).
22. Bol'shakova V. M. Appellation as a chrono-discrete Russian institution, Voprosy rossiiskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava, 2018, Vol. 8, No. 7A, pp. 5–12 (in Russ.).
23. Krainova E. R. Chrono-discrete general legal research of appellation institution in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation, PhD (Law) thesis, Vladimir, 2016 (in Russ.).
24. Bol'shakova V. M. Jury as a chrono-discrete Russian institution, Voprosy rossiiskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava, 2019, Vol. 9, No. 3A, pp. 7–15 (in Russ.).
25. Gol'tsman E. V. Requirements to bailiffs in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation (comparative-legal analysis), Topical issues and development prospects of the scientific school of chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal studies, collection of works by the materials of the 1st All-Russia scientific conference, ed. A. A. Demichev, K. A. Demichev, Nizhny Novgorod, NIU RANKhiGS, 2018, pp. 117–127 (in Russ.).
26. Leonov A. P. State Duma in Russia as a chrono-discrete Russian institution, Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2017, No. 1 (37), pp. 126–130 (in Russ.).
27. Leonov A. P. Comparative-legal research of the terms of acquiring a legal status of the State Duma deputy in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation, Istoriko-pravovye problemy: Novyi rakurs, 2017, No. 18, pp. 135–152 (in Russ.).
28. Demichev K. A. Idea and conception as an object of study in chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal studies, Rossiiskii zhurnal pravovykh issledovanii, 2017, No. 3, pp. 13–15 (in Russ.).
29. Khuzhin A. M. Behavioral conception of guilt in specific law: historical prerequisites and today’s understanding, Khronodiskretnoe monogeograficheskoe sravnitel'noe pravovedenie, sb. nauchn. tr., ed. A. A. Demichev, Is. 4, Moscow, 2012, pp. 180–189 (in Russ.).
30. Demichev A. A. Ways of forming a civil society in Russia: history and modernity, Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2018, No. 2, pp. 22–26 (in Russ.).
31. Bol'shakova V. M. Advocacy as an institution of civil society in Russia: history and modernity, Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2017, No. 4, pp. 41–44 (in Russ.).
32. Bol'shakova V. M. Chrono-discrete Russian institutions (by the example of judicial reforms in Russia in the second half of the 19th c and in the end of the 20th – beginning of the 21st c), Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2018, No. 3, pp. 51–56 (in Russ.).
33. Cherepanov S. I. Advocacy as a chrono-discrete Russian institution (n the issue of periodization of the history of Russian advocacy), Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2016, No. 3 (35), pp. 37–42 (in Russ.).
34. Cherepanov S. I. Pre-revolutionary historiography of the Russian advocacy, Man and society in contradictions and consent, collection of scientific works by the materials of the International scientific-practical conference (Nizhny Novgorod, 19 November 2015), Nizhny Novgorod, Gladkova O. V., 2015, pp. 363–366 (in Russ.).
35. Cherepanov S. I. Legislation on advocacy in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation (comparative-legal analysis), Man and society in contradictions and consent, collection of scientific works by the materials of the International scientific-practical conference, Nizhny Novgorod, Gladkova O. V., 2014, pp. 450–453 (in Russ.).
36. Cherepanov S. I. Prohibitions established for the jury members in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation (comparativelegal analysis), Istoriko-pravovye problemy: Novyi rakurs, 2016, No. 18, pp. 122–132 (in Russ.).
37. Cherepanov S. I. On the notion of advocacy in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation in the context of of chronodiscrete approach, Istoriko-pravovye problemy: Novyi rakurs, 2017, No. 4, pp. 116–127 (in Russ.).
38. Cherepanov S. I. On applying the methodology of chrono-discrete monogeographical comparative legal studies to studying the advocacy institution in Russia, Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2015, No. 1 (29), pp. 362–365 (in Russ.).
39. Cherepanov S. I. Corporate organization of advocacy in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation (comparative-legal analysis), Student genius – 2015, collection of works by the materials of the 13th International scientific-practical conference of students, post-graduate students and young scientists (Nizhny Novgorod, 21 May 2015), Nizhny Novgorod, Gladkova O. V., 2015, pp. 473–475 (in Russ.).
40. Cherepanov S. I. Normative-legal basis of organization and activity of advocacy in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation (comparative-legal analysis), Istoriko-pravovye problemy: Novyi rakurs, 2018, No. 2, pp. 180–188 (in Russ.).
41. Cherepanov S. I. Rights and obligations of the jury in the Russian Empire and advocates in the Russian Federation (comparative-legal analysis), State and law in the changing world, works of the 2nd scientific-practical conference with international paticipation (Nizhny Novgorod, 3 March 2016), Nizhny Novgorod, PF FGBOUVO "RGUP", 2017, pp. 173–177 (in Russ.).
42. Cherepanov S. I. Requirements to advocates in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation (comparative-legal analysis), Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2015, No. 3 (31), pp. 237–242 (in Russ.).
43. Cherepanov S. I. Advocacy functions in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation (comparative-legal analysis), Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi pravovoi akademii, 2017, No. 14, pp. 28–29 (in Russ.).
44. Cherepanov S. I. Functions of an advocate in the legal procedure with participation of the jury in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation (comparative-legal analysis), Student genius – 2018, collection of works by the materials of the 15th International scientific-practical conference of students, post-graduate students and young scientists (Nizhny Novgorod, 26 April 2018), Nizhny Novgorod, Gladkova O. V., 2018, pp. 219–222 (in Russ.).
Citation :
Bolshakova V. M. Review of the dissertation by S. I. Cherepanov “Comparative-legal study of the jury institution in the Russian Empire according to the 1864 judicial reform and the advocacy institution in the Russian Federation” (Nizhniy Novgorod, 2018. 192 p.), Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2019, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 1450–1460 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.3.1450-1460
Type of article : The scientific article
Date of receipt of the article :
27.05.2019
Date of adoption of the print :
30.07.2019
Date of online accommodation :
25.09.2019
