по-русски

Actual Problems of
Economics and Law

 

16+

 

DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.1.993-1006

скачать PDF

Authors :
1. Ekaterina V. Slesarenko, Senior Lecture of the Department of Economics
Kuzbass State Technical University named after T. F. Gorbachev



Structural modernization as the basis of progressive and safe social-economic development of the Russian economy


Objective: to determine the impact of economy structure on the progressive and safe socio-economic development of national economic systems.


Methods: the methodological basis of the study was the scientifc research of the relationship between structural changes in the economy, the level of development and socio-economic policy of states, as well as their position in the system of world economic relations. The specifc methods used were the method of theoretical cognition, the methods of observation, generalization, comparative analysis, data grouping, and analogy.


Results: under mobility of the external environment at the state level, one of the urgent tasks is to fnd the most effective model of economy. In Russia, the objective need for progressive upward development is due to technological backwardness and the increased vulnerability to the economic challenges of our time. It is determined that one of the key conditions for the upward economic development is to increase the technological level in the country. It emphasizes the need to move from the predominance of reproductive system to a vertically integrated system of inter-industry production chains. It is indicated that the development of a market economy is associated with a number of challenges that threaten such development, including the reduction of economic sovereignty of countries as a result of the predominance of individual economies. This determines the need to consider the upward development of the country’s economy through the prism of economic security. Based on the analysis of economic literature and statistical data, it is proved that the economy structure is a factor, indicator and condition of the upward movement of national economic systems. The upward movement of national economic systems, in turn, is seen through the prism of progressive and safe socio-economic development as an objective requirement of modern reality, achieving of which is determined by the structural changes in the economy. In this regard, it is proved that it is necessary to ensure the structural modernization of the Russian economy as the basis of its progressive and safe development.


Scientific novelty: consideration of the upward movement of national economic systems through the prism of progressive and safe socio-economic development, which, in turn, is achieved through the modernization of the economy structure.


Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions can be used in the development of the foundations of the state economic policy and state strategies of socio-economic development of the national economy in the future.


Keywords :

Economics and national economy management; Structural modernization; Russian economy; Progressive and safe social and economic development; Economy structure; National economy; Economic situation of the state


Bibliography :

1. Lyubimtseva S. V. Laws of structural evolution of economic systems, Ekonomist, 2003, No. 10, pp. 29–40 (in Russ.).
2. Bell D.
The coming of post-industrial society. Venture in social forecasting, N. Y., Collman Pub, 1973, 884 р.
3. Shumpeter I.
Theory of economic development, Moscow, Progress, 1982, 455 p. (in Russ.).
4. Komkov N. I. Role of innovations and technologies in the development of economy and society,
Problemy prognozirovaniya, 2003, No. 3, pp. 24–43 (in Russ.).
5. Sukharev O. S.
Economy of technological development, Moscow, Finansy i statistika, 2008, 481 p. (in Russ.).
6. Abuzyarova M. I. Methodological bases of structural shifts in economy,
Ekonomicheskie nauki, 2011, No. 4 (77), pp. 181–185 (in Russ.).
7. Yakovets Yu. V.
Epoch-making innovations of the 21st century, Moscow, Ekonomika, 2004, 444 p. (in Russ.).
8. Glaz'ev S. Yu. Global economic crisis as a process of changing eth technological setups,
Voprosy ekonomiki, 2009, No. 3, pp. 26–38 (in Russ.).
9. Zubarev A. E., Gasanov E. A., Gasanov M. A. Technological dynamism of economy and dominating innovative clusters,
Vestnik TOGU, 2011, No. 1 (20), pp. 149–158 (in Russ.).
10. Gubanov S. S. Crisis realia of Russia and their reflection in estimantions of the government (analyzing an article by D. Medvedev),
Ekonomist, 2015, No. 10, pp. 3–51 (in Russ.).
11. Dzarasov S. S. Crisis in Russia: sources and lessons,
Voprosy ekonomiki, 2009, No. 5, pp. 69–85 (in Russ.).
12. Tatarkin A. I., Makarova I. V., Rudakov R. B. Lessons of the foreign experience of import substitution,
Ekonomist, No. 5, 2016, pp. 14–29 (in Russ.).
13. Amosov A. A. Is it possible to postpone till 2017 the turn to new industrial development?,
Ekonomist, 2015, No. 3, pp. 3–13 (in Russ.).
14. Alekseev A. V. Creating innovative economy: the state starts?,
Ekonomist, 2015, No. 6, pp. 48–56 (in Russ.).
15. Kuchukov R. A. No alternative to planned neo-industrialization,
Ekonomist, 2015, No. 4, pp. 18–28 (in Russ.).
16. Varnavskii V. G. New conception of state-private partnership in Great Britain,
Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2014, No. 8, pp. 67–75 (in Russ.).
17. Tolkachev S. A. Two models of neo-industrialization: Germany “Industry 4.0” and the USA – “Industrial Internet of Things”,
Ekonomist, No. 9, 2015, pp. 13–23 (in Russ.).
18. Keynes J. M. The general theory of employment, interest and money,
Antologiya ekonomicheskoi klassiki, Vol. 2, Moscow, Ekonov, 1993, 486 p. (in Russ.).
19. Serebryakov V. V.
Social security of Russia: conceptual approach, Moscow, RITs, 1995, 155 p. (in Russ.).
20. Vikhanskii O. S., Naumov A. I.
Management, Moscow, Ekonomist", 2006, 670 p. (in Russ.).
21. Abalkin L. A. Economic security of Russia: threats and their repulsion,
Voprosy ekonomiki, 1994, No. 12, pp. 4–14 (in Russ.).
22.
Bases of economic security (state, region, enterprise, personality), ed. E. A. Oleinikov, Moscow, ZAO "Biznes-shkola "Intel-sintez", 1997, 288 p. (in Russ.).
23.
Economic security of Russia: general course, ed. V. K. Senchagov, Moscow, Delo, 2005, 896 p. (in Russ.).
24. Afontsev S. A. National economic security: on the way to theoretical consensus,
Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2002, No. 10, pp. 30–39 (in Russ.).
25. Stankevičienė J., Sviderskė T., Miečinskienė A. Comparison of country risk, sustainability and economic safety indices,
Business: Theory and Practice, 2014, No. 15 (1), pp. 1–10.
26. Krivyakov S. V.
Theoretical analysis of economic systems, Tomsk, Izd-vo Tomskogo universiteta, 2007, 148 p. (in Russ.).
27. Fisher A. Production, primary, secondary and tertiary,
Economic Record, 1939, No. 15 (1), pp. 24–38.
28. Clark C.
The Conditions of Economic Progress, London, Macmillan, 1940, 504 p.
29. Reich R.
The work of nations. Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism, New York, 1992, 188 p.
30.
Global economy: global trends during 100 years, ed. I. S. Korolev, Moscow, Ekonomist", 2003, 604 p. (in Russ.).
31.
People’s economy of the USSR during 70 years: a jubilee statistical year-book, Goskomstat SSSR, Moscow, Finansy i statistika, 1987, 766 p. (in Russ.).
32. Gylfason T. Natural resources, education and economic development,
European economic review, 2001, Vol. 45, No. 4–6, pp. 847–859.
33. Stijns J. Natural resource abundance and human capital accumulation,
World development, 2006, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 1060–1083.
34. Suslova E., Volchkova N. Human capital, industrial growth and resource curse,
New economic school working paper, 2007No. 13, pp. 65–85.
35. Mlaabdal Saady Mahmood Abaas, Chygryn O., Kubatko O., Pimonenko T. Social and economic drivers of national economic development: the case of OPEC countries,
Problems and Perspectives in Management, 2018, Vol. 16, Is. 4, pp. 155–168.

36. Guriev S. M., Plekhanov A. S., Sonin K. I. Economic mechanism of the “raw materials” model of development, Voprosy ekonomiki, 2010, No. 3, pp. 4–23 (in Russ.).
37. Krasil'nikov O. Yu. Problems of structural transformations in economy,
Ekonomist, 2005, No. 8, pp. 52–58 (in Russ.).
38. Sukharev O. S. On the elaboration of a comprehensive methodology for analyzing the structural shifts in national economy,
Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost', 2013, No. 13 (202), pp. 56–64 (in Russ.).
39. Senchagov V. K. National structural policy – a way to providing economic security,
Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii estestvennykh nauk, 2015, No. 5, pp. 64–70 (in Russ.).
40. Kalabekov I. G.
Russia, China and the USA in fgures, reference book, Moscow, 2014, 254 p. (in Russ.).
41. Osokina N. V., Slesarenko E. V. Structural disproportions as a threat to economic security of Russia,
Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2016, Vol. 10, No. 2 (38), pp. 124–139 (in Russ.).
42. Slesarenko E. V. Key benchmarks of the policy of structural modernization of contemporary Russia,
Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost', 2018, Vol. 14, No. 5 (362), pp. 897–912 (in Russ.).


Citation :

Slesarenko E. V. Structural modernization as the basis of progressive and safe social-economic development of the Russian economy, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2019, vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 993–1006 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.1.993-1006


Type of article : The scientific article

Date of receipt of the article :
09.11.2018

Date of adoption of the print :
27.02.2019

Date of online accommodation :
25.03.2019