скачать PDF
Authors : 1. Anatoliy T. Zub,
Doctor of Philosophy, Honored professor of MSU, Deputy Dean of the Faculty of State Management, Professor of the Department of the Economy of Innovative Development
Moscow State University named after M. V. Lomonosov
2. Sergey S. Kuzmin,
PhD (Engineering), doctorate student of the Department of the Economy of Innovative Development, Faculty of State Management
Moscow State University named after M. V. Lomonosov
Paradigms of corporate growth: methodological foundations
Objective: to define corporate growth paradigms and to identify their methodological foundations that serve as the basis for combining the theories, concepts and models of corporate growth into paradigms.
Methods: the research methods of development of scientific knowledge developed under the direction post-neopositivist methodology of science, methodology of paradigms by Th. Kuhn, scientific research programs by I. Lakatos, evolution of knowledge by S. Toulmin, “methodological anarchism” by P. Feyerabend, methods of distinguishing between simple and complex, mechanical and organic systems, principles of self-organization and synergetics.
Results: the efficiency of using the general scientific methodology of paradigms for the analysis of trends while studying the corporate growth causes and patterns is proved. Three key paradigms of corporate growth are defined: causal paradigm, paradigm of growth results, and process paradigm. It is shown that the basis for classifying a particular theory of growth to a particular paradigm are the basic general theoretical and methodological principles specific to each of the paradigms. The tendencies in the growth paradigms development are determined; at present the new, integrative paradigm of growth is formed, which includes theories and theoretical models exploring the processes of companies’ integration.
Scientific novelty: for the first time in the practice of corporate growth research, the methodology was applied for the analysis of the scientific knowledge development as competition of paradigms; the structure of the growth paradigms was revealed and the tendency of the formation of a new paradigm of corporate growth and integration was formulated.
Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions can be used to analyze the trends of change and growth of specific organizations and to predict the directions of their development, as well as in the practice of management consulting.
Keywords :
Theory of economics; Corporate growth; Models of organizational growth; Mechanistic and organic organizations; System approach; Alliances
Bibliography :
1. Kun T. Structure of scientific revolutions, Moscow, AST, 2015, 320 p. (in Russ.).
2. Lakatos I. Falsification and methodology of scientific-research programs, Moscow, Medium, 1995, 236 p. (in Russ.).
3. Tulmin S. Conceptual revolutions in science, Struktura i razvitie nauki, Moscow, Progress, 1978 (in Russ.).
4. Feierabend P. Selected works on methodology of science, Moscow, Progress, 1986, 543 p. (in Russ.).
5. Polan'i K. Selected works, Moscow, Territoriya budushchego, 2013, 200 p. (in Russ.).
6. Glaz'ev S. Yu. On the new paradigm in economic science, Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik, 2016, No. 56, iyun', pp. 5–39 (in Russ.).
7. Grandi T. Growth of business, Moscow, Eksmo, 2007, 288 p. (in Russ.).
8. Charan R. Growing fro profit, Moscow, Vil'yams, 2006, 215 p. (in Russ.).
9. Couto V., Plansky J., Gaglar D. Fit for Growth: A Guide to Strategic Cost Cutting, Restructuring, and Renewal, Hoboken, Wiley, 2017, 288 p.
10. Gil E. High growth handbook, San Francisco, Stripe Press, 2018, 344 p.
11. McKelvie A., Wiklund J. Advancing Firm Growth Research: A Focus on Growth Mode Instead of Growth Rate, Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2010, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 261–288. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00375.x
12. Slowinski G. Reinventing corporate growth, Gladstone, Alliance management group, 2016.
13. Shepherd D., Wiklund J. Are we comparing apples with apples or apples with oranges? Appropriateness of knowledge accumulation across growth studies, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2009, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 105–123. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00282.x
14. Macpherson A., Holt R. Knowledge, learning and small firm growth: A systematic review of the evidence, Research Policy, 2007, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 172–192. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.10.001
15. Coad A. Firm growth: A survey, Papers on economics and evolution, 2007, No. 0703. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Evolutionary economics group, Jena, 2007. 72 p.
16. Morgan G. Images of an organization. Stockholm school of economics, Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2008, 504 p. (in Russ.).
17. Gilbert B., McDougall P., Audretsch D. New venture growth: A review and extension, Journal of Management, 2006, Vol. 32, No. 6, рp. 926–950. DOI: 10.1177/0149206306293860
18. Kaplan R., Norton D. Strategic unity. Creating synergy of an organization with a balanced system of indicators, Moscow, Vil'ms, 2006, 371 p. (in Russ.).
19. Jawahar I., McLaughlin G. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach, Academy of management Review, 2001, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 397–414. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2001.4845803
20. Greiner L. Evolution and revolution in the process of organizational growth, Management of changes, Saint Petersburg, Vysshaya shkola menedzhmenta, 2010, pp. 192–209 (in Russ.).
21. Nelson R., Winter S. Evolution theory of economic changes, Moscow, Piter, 2000 (in Russ.).
22. Bolden D. Powell J. Labcorp: The DNA of a Corporation, Вoston, Chapel Hill, 2017, 160 p.
23. David G., Neilson G. Organizational to Executive: It’s in the DNA, Ivey Business Journal, 2006, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 1–16.
24. Thomas S. Jumpstart Your Service Revolution: Transform Your Company's DNA and Thrive in an Age of Disruption, Organizational DNA: Diagnosing your organization for increased Effectiveness, ed. by L. Harold and R. Silverman, Palo Alto, Davies Black publishing, 2018, pp. 101–123.
25. Garnsey E., Stam E., Heffernan P. New firm growth: exploring processes and paths, Industry and Innovation, 2006, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/13662710500513367
26. Zub A. T. Management of changes, Moscow, Yurait, 2017, 284 p. (in Russ.).
Citation :
Zub A. T., Kuzmin S. S. Paradigms of corporate growth: methodological foundations, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2019, vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 913–922 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.1.913-922
Type of article : The scientific article
Date of receipt of the article :
07.12.2018
Date of adoption of the print :
02.03.2019
Date of online accommodation :
25.03.2019
