DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.12.2018.4.842-860

скачать PDF

---

Президентская риторика демонстрации контроля над преступностью (на примере киберпреступности)

---

Цель: комплексный анализ президентской риторики демонстрации контроля над преступностью.

Методы: диалектический подход к познанию социальных явлений, позволяющий проанализировать их в историческом развитии и функционировании в контексте совокупности объективных и субъективных факторов, который определил выбор следующих методов исследования: формально-логический, сравнительно-правовой и социологический.

Результаты: темой публичных выступлений президентов все чаще становится уголовное правосудие. Многие их политические речи призваны создать впечатление борьбы с преступностью и насилием, тогда как реальные меры не принимаются. Более того, если какие-либо действия и предпринимаются, они неэффективны и не приводят ни к каким значительным изменениям в политике. Формирование впечатления, что президенты борются с преступностью, часто называют демонстрацией контроля над преступностью. Для нее характерно использование вымышленных нарративов, моральной обеспокоенности, низкого уровня разногласий в обществе, а также неэффективности политики в данной области. В более ранних исследованиях была неоднократно показана значимость демонстрации контроля над преступностью в различных аспектах уголовного правосудия, однако они никогда не касались современной проблемы киберпреступности.

Научная новизна: в работе впервые проанализирована проблема президентской риторики демонстрации контроля над преступностью, изучены схемы и тенденции президентской риторики в отношении киберпреступности. Авторы применяют качественный контент-анализ для проверки гипотезы, которая заключается в том, что президенты используют методики демонстрации контроля над преступностью при обсуждении киберпреступности, в частности,методы вымышленных нарративов и моральной обеспокоенности. В результате этого опасения широкой публики по поводу киберпреступности сглаживаются, а принятие значимых мер откладывается. Результаты исследования подтверждают выдвинутую гипотезу.

Практическая значимость: основные положения и выводы статьи могут быть использованы в научной и педагогической деятельности при рассмотрении вопросов, связанных с президентской риторикой демонстрации контроля над преступностью.

Ключевые слова :

демонстрация контроля над преступностью; киберпреступность; президентская риторика; моральная обеспокоенность; вымышленные нарративы

Cписок литературы :

1. Berfield S. From cyber crime to Canada, Target had a very bad year, Businessweek, 2014, available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-02-26/from-cyber-crime-to-canada-target-had-a-very-bad-year
2. Sanger D. E., Perlroth N. US said to find North Korea ordered cyberattack on Sony, New York Times, 2014, available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/18/world/asia/us-links-north-korea-to-sony-hacking.html?_r=0
3. Reuters. Four million current, former federal employees affected by cyber attack, Newsweek, 2015, available at: http://www.newsweek.com/four-million-current-former-federal-employees-affected-cyber-attack-339694
4. Perlroth N., Scott M., Frenkel S. Cyberattack hits Ukraine then spreads internationally, New York Times, June 27, 2017, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/27/technology/ransomware-hackers.html
5. Thierer A. Technopanics, threat inflation, and the danger of an information technology precautionary principle, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science &Technology, 2013, No. 14, pp. 309–440. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2012494
6. Waddington P. A. J. Mugging as moral panic: A question of proportion, British Journal of Sociology, 1986, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 245–259. DOI: 10.2307/590356
7. Cohen S. Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and rockers, London, England, 1972.
8. Thierer A. The six things that drive 'technopanics, Forbes, 2012, March 12, available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamthierer/2012/03/04/the-six-things-that-drive-technopanics/#60c590bf70b0
9. Hammond M., Miller M. K., Griffin T. Safe haven laws as crime control theater, Child Abuse and Neglect, 2010, Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 545–552. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.11.006
10. Griffin T., Miller M. K. Child abduction, AMBER Alert and "crime control theater", Criminal Justice Review, 2008, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 159–176. DOI: 10.1177/0734016808316778
11. Sicafuse L. L., Miller M. K. Social psychological influences on the popularity of Amber Alerts, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 2010, Vol. 37, No. 11, pp. 1237–1254. DOI: 10.1177/0093854810379618
12. Sicafuse L. L., Miller M. K. The effects of information processing and message quality on attitudes toward the Amber Alert system, Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2012, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 69–86.
13. Miko A., Miller M. K. Mandatory influenza vaccinations: An example of health promotion theater, Global Health Governance, 2010, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.2165/00128413-200615390-00004
14. Hunt A. 'Moral panic' and moral language in the media, British Journal of Sociology, 1997, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 629–648. DOI: 10.2307/591600

15. Sindall R. Street violence in the nineteenth century: Media panic or real danger?, Leicester, England: Leicester University Press, 1990.
16. Sacco V. F. Media constructions of crime, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1995, Vol. 539, No. 1, pp. 141–154. DOI: 10.1177/0002716295539001011
17. Innes M. Reinventing tradition? Reassurance, neighborhood security and policing, Criminal Justice, 2004, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 151–171. DOI: 10.1177/1466802504044914
18. Edelman M. The symbolic uses of politics, Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 1964.
19. Marion N. E., Oliver W. M. Congress, crime, and budgetary Responsiveness, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2009, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 115–135. DOI: 10.1177/0887403408320521
20. Oliver W. M., Marion N., Hill J. B. Not all crime policies are created equal: Presidential speeches and symbolic rhetoric by crime policy types, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2014, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 331–347. DOI: 10.1177/0887403414549208
21. Marion N. E. Symbolic policies in Clinton's crime control agenda, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 1997, Vol. 1, pp. 67–108. DOI: 10.1525/nclr.1997.1.1.67
22. Marion N. E., Oliver W. M. Crime control in the 2008 presidential election: Symbolic or tangible policies?, American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2011, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 111–125. DOI: 10.1007/s12103-010-9084-0
23. Stolz B. A. Interpreting the U.S. human trafficking debate through the lens of symbolic politics, Law and Policy, 2007, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 311–338. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2007.00257
24. Elder C. D., Cobb R. G. Political uses of symbols, New York, NY: Longman Press, 1983.
25. Stolz B. A. Congress and capital punishment, Law and Policy Quarterly, 1983, Vol. 5, pp. 157–180. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1983.tb00294
26. Anderson J. E. Public policymaking: An introduction, Boston, MA, Houghton Mifflin, 1990.
27. Marion N. E. Symbolism and federal crime control legislation: 1960–1990, Journal of Crime and Justice, 1994, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 69–91. DOI: 10.1080/0735648X.1994.9721515
28. Bottici C. Mythic narrative, Encyclopedia of political theory, ed. Bevir M. Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE, 2010, pp. 915–916.
29. Hawdon J. E. The role of presidential rhetoric in the creation of a moral panic: Reagan, Bush, and the war on drugs, Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2001, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 419–445. DOI: 10.1080/01639620152472813
30. Miller M. K., S. C. S. Improving the AMBER Alert system: Psychology research and policy recommendations, Law and Psychology Review, 2006, Vol. 30, pp. 2–21.
31. Miller M. K., Griffin S. S., Clinkenbeard R. M., Thomas. The psychology of Amber Alert: Unresolved issues and implications, The Social Science Journal, 2009, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 111–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2008.12.004
32. Calder J. D. The origins and development of federal crime control policy: Herbert Hoover's initiatives, Westport, CT, Praeger, 1993.
33. Marion N. E. A history of federal crime control initiatives, 1960–1993, Westport, CT, Praeger, 1994.
34. Beckett K., Sasson T. The politics of injustice: Crime and punishment in America, Thousand Oaks, CA, Pine Forge Press, 2000.
35. Caplan G. Reflections on the nationalization of crime, 1964–1968, Law and the Social Order, 1973, pp. 583–635.
36. Cronin T. E., Cronin T. Z., Milakovich M. E. U.S. v. crime in the streets, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1981.
37. Finckenauer J. O. Crime as a national political issue, 1964–1976, Crime & Delinquency, 1978, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 13–27. DOI: 10.1177/001112877802400102
38. Scheingold S. A. The politics of street crime: Criminal process and cultural obsession, Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press, 1991.
39. Scheingold S. A. Politics, public policy, and street crime, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1995, Vol. 539, pp. 155–168. DOI: 10.1177/0002716295539001012
40. Oliver W. M. Presidential rhetoric on crime and public opinion, Criminal Justice Review, 1998, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 139–160. DOI: 10.1177/073401689802300202
41. Oliver W. M. The law & order presidency, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall, 2003.
42. Fairchild E. S., Webb V. J. The politics of crime and criminal justice, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage, 1985.
43. Jacob H., Lineberry R. L., Heinz A. M., Beecher J. A., Moran J., Swank D. H. Governmental responses to crime: Crime on urban agendas, Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 1982.
44. Lempert M., Silverstein M. Creatures of politics: Media, message and the American presidency, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 2012.
45. Oliver W. M. Executive orders: Symbolic politics, criminal justice policy and the American presidency, American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2001, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 1–21. DOI: 10.1007/BF02886854
46. Caldeira G. A. Elections and the politics of crime: Budgetary choices and priorities in America, The political science of criminal justice, ed. Nagel S. et al., Springfield, IL, Charles C. Thomas, 1983, pp. 238–252.

47. Caldeira G. A., Cowart A. T. Budgets, institutions, and change: Criminal justice policy in America, American Journal of Political Science, 1980, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 413–438. DOI: 10.1177/0887403406292687
48. Oliver W. M., Marion N. E. "Budgets, institutions, and change: Criminal justice policy in America" revisited, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2006, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 451–467. DOI: 10.1177/0887403406292687
49. Oliver W. M., Marion N. E. Congress, crime, and budgetary responsiveness: A study in symbolic politics, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2009, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 115–135. DOI: 10.1177/0887403408320521
50. Perloff R. Political communication, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Earlbaum, 1998.
51. Cohen J. E. Presidential responsiveness and public policy making: The public and the policies that presidents choose, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press, 1997.
52. Light P. C. The president's agenda, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.
53. Hill J. B., Oliver W. M., Marion N. E. "Shaping history" or "riding the wave"?: President Bush's influence on the public opinion of terrorism, homeland security and crime, Journal of Criminal Justice, 2010, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 896–902. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.06.005
54. Cohen J. E. Presidential rhetoric and the public agenda, American Journal of Political Science, 1995, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 87–107. DOI: 10.2307/2111759
55. Denton R. F., Jr., Hahn D. F. Presidential communication, New York, NY, Praeger, 1986.
56. Oliver W. M., Marion N., Hill J. B. Presidential politics and the problem of drugs in America: Assessing the relationship between the President, media and public opinion, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2012, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 90–107. DOI: 10.1177/0887403410396211
57. Young G., Perkins W. B. Presidential rhetoric, the public agenda and the end of the Golden Age of Television, Journal of Politics, 2005, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 1190–1205. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468- 2508.2005.00356
58. Brace P., Hinckley B. Follow the leader: Opinion polls and the modern presidents, New York, NY, Basic Books, 1992.
59. Brace P., Hinckley B. Follow the leader: Opinion polls and the modern presidents, New York, NY, Basic Books, 1993.
60. Hinckley P. The symbolic presidency, New York, NY, Routledge, 1990.
61. Kernell S. Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership, Washington, DC, C.Q. Press, 2006.
62. Ostrom C. W., Simon D. M. Promise and performance: A dynamic model of presidential popularity, American Political Science Review, 1985, Vol. 79, No. 2, pp. 334–358. DOI: 10.2307/1956653
63. Ostrom C. W., Simon D. M. The president's public, American Journal of Political Science, 1988, Vol. 32, pp. 1096–1119.
64. Ostrom C. W., Simon D. M. The man in the Teflon suit: The environmental connection, political drama, and popular support in the Reagan presidency, Public Opinion Quarterly, 1989, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 353–387. DOI: 10.1086/269157
65. Ragsdale L. The politics of presidential speechmaking, 1949–1980, American Political Science Review, 1984, Vol. 78, No. 4, pp. 971–984. DOI: 10.2307/1955802
66. Ragsdale L. Presidential speechmaking and the public audience: individual presidents and group attitudes, Journal of Politics, 1987, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 704–736. DOI: 10.2307/2131275
67. Altheide D. L. Terrorism and the politics of fear, Lanham, MD, Altamira Press, 2006.
68. Altheide D. L. Moral panic. From sociological concept to the public discourse, Crime, Media, Culture, 2009, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 79–99. DOI: 10.1177/1741659008102063
69. Wall D. S. Cybercrime and the culture of fear: Social science fiction(s) and the production of knowledge about cybercrime, Information, Communication & Society, 2011, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 861–884. DOI: 10.1080/13691180802007788
70. Wall D. S. Cybercrime, media and insecurity: The shaping of public perceptions of cybercrime, International Review of Law Computers and Technology, 2008, Vol. 22, No. 1–2, pp. 45–63. DOI: 10.1080/13600860801924907
71. Levi M. Suite revenge? The shaping of folk devils and moral panics about white-collar crimes, British Journal of Criminology, 2009, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 48–67. DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azn073
72. Kingdon S. Agenda, alternatives, and public policies, New York, NY, Harper-Collins, 1995.
73. Gordon S., Ford R. On the definition and classification of cybercrime, Journal of Computer Virology, 2006, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 13–20. DOI: 10.1007/s 11416-006-0015-z
74. Kshetri N. Reliability, validity, comparability and practical utility of cybercrime – related data, metrics, and information, Information, 2013, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 117–123. DOI: 10.3390/info4010117
75. Cavelty M. D. Cyber-terror – looming threat or phantom menace? The framing of the US cyber-threat debate, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 2007, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 19–36. DOI: 10.1300/J516v04n01_03
76. Trump D. J. Remarks during a roundtable with the American Technology Council, The American Presidency Project, 2017, June 19, available at: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=126491
77. Bush G. W. Proclamation 7774 – National Crime Victims' Rights Week, 2004, The American Presidency Project, April 17, 2004, available at: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=62059

78. Goode E., Ben-Yehuda N. Moral panics: The social construction of deviance, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1994.
79. Clinton W. J. Remarks at the Council of the Americas 30th Washington Conference, The American Presidency Project, May 2, 2000, available at: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=58427
80. Rothe D., Muzzatti S. L. Enemies everywhere: Terrorism, moral panic, and US civil society, Critical Criminology, 2004, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 327–350. DOI: 10.1007/s10612-004-3879-6
81. Bush G. W. Remarks on children's online safety, The American Presidency Project, October 23, 2002, available at: http://www.presidency.ucsb. edu/ws/?pid=62644
82. Lewis O., Fox S. Fear of online crime, 2001, available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2001/04/02/fear-of-online-crime/
83. Clinton W. J. Remarks announcing steps to make the internet family-friendly, The American Presidency Project, July 16, 1997, available at: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pi
84. Potter R. H., Potter L. A. The Internet, cyberporn, and sexual exploitation of children: media moral panics and urban myths for middle-class parents?, Sexuality and Culture, 2001, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 31–48. DOI: 10.1007/s 12119-001-1029-9
85. Obama B. H. Remarks at the Federal Trade Commission Constitution Center, The American Presidency Project, 2015, January 12, available at: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=109215
86. Bowman-Grieve L. Cyberterrorism and moral panics, Terrorism online, politics, law and technology, ed. Jarvis L. et al., Abingdon, England, Routledge, 2015, pp. 87–106.
87. Bush G. W. Remarks at the World Bank, The American Presidency Project, July 17, 2001, available at: http: //www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=73621
88. Obama B. H. Remarks on Signing an Executive Order on Promoting Private Sector Cybersecurity Information Sharing in Stanford, California, The American Presidency Project, 2015, April 1, available at: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=109410
89. Stroud S. R. Technology and mythic narrative: The Matrix as technological heroD quest, Western Journal of Communication, 2001, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 416–441. DOI: 10.1080/10570310109374719
90. Cavelty M. D. From cyber-bombs to political fallout: Threat representations with impact in the cyber-security discourse, International Studies Review, 2013, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 105–122. DOI: 10.1111/misr.12023
91. Cavelty M. D. Cyber-security and threat politics, New York, NY, Routledge, 2008.
92. Kingdon J. W. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, New York, NY, Longman, 2003.
93. Jenkins H., Boyd D. Discussion: MySpace and Deleting Online Predators Act, Digital Divide Network, 2006, available at: http://www.digitaldivide.net/articles/view.php?ArticleID=592
94. Clinton, W. J. Statement on zero tolerance for prescription drug internet sites that harm patient health and safety. December 28, 1999, The American Presidency Project, available at: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=57125
95. Marion N., Hill J. B. Presidential Rhetoric as Crime Control Theater: The Case of Cybercrime, Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 2015, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 81–97.

Оригинальная публикация: https://ccjls.scholasticahq.com/article/3794-presidential-rhetoric-as-crime-control-theater-the-case-of-cybercrime

Цитирование :

Марион Н., Хилл Дж. Б. Президентская риторика демонстрации контроля над преступностью (на примере киберпреступности) // Актуальные проблемы экономики и права. 2018. Т. 12, № 4. С. 842–860. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.12.2018.4.842-860

Тип статьи : Научная статья

Дата поступления статьи :
17.09.2018

Дата принятия в печать :
18.11.2018

Дата онлайн размещения :
25.12.2018