скачать PDF
Authors : 1. Ekaterina B. Abakumova,
PhD (Law), Researcher of the Department of Social and Legal Research; Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law; Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure
Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk Military Institute named after General I. K. Yakovlev of the National Guard of the Russian Federation; Siberian Institute of Management – branch of the Russian Academy of Economy and Civil Service under the Russian President
State-legal protection of entrepreneurs’ rights in public legal relations
Objective: comprehensive analysis of the state legal protection of the rights of entrepreneurs in public relations.
Methods: reliability of the study and validity of the author’s arguments are provided by the use of both empirical and theoretical methods of cognition (description, analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction). In addition to general scientific methods, the paper used special legal research methods: formal-legal and comparative-legal.
Results: the article actualizes the theoretical and practical issues of state legal protection of the rights of entrepreneurs in relations with state and municipal authorities. The study focuses on the analysis of competence of the main elements of the state human rights mechanism in relation to business entities, in which the key role belongs to the institution of business ombudsmen, the judiciary bodies and the Prosecutor’s Office. The measures taken by the state in the recent years, aimed at strengthening the rule of law in the legal relations under consideration, including the establishment of the institution of business ombudsmen, special units to monitor the observance of the entrepreneurs’ rights in the Prosecutor’s Offices, as well as granting of additional powers to the Prosecutor’s Office, indicate a trend towards increasing the effectiveness of the human rights protection mechanism.
Scientific novelty: the author proposes her own definition of the concept of the state-legal mechanism for the protection of entrepreneurs’ rights, which is understood as a set of complementary means (legal, administrative, economic, etc.), by which the state exerts an impact on legal relations between subjects of law in order to protect the rights and legitimate interests of entrepreneurs. The paper also considers the structure of the above-mentioned mechanism, identifies its main elements and their role
at the present stage of development of human rights protection of the state, and identifies the actual problems of its functioning.
Practical significance: the theoretical provisions presented in this article expand knowledge about the nature and content of the state legal protection of the entrepreneurs’ rights in the Russian Federation. The results of the study can be used in legislative and law enforcement practice for further improvement of legal regulation and institutional support of the statelegal mechanism of the entrepreneurs’ rights protection.
Keywords :
Entrepreneurship law; Business activity; Right to business activity; Protection of the rights and legitimate interests of entrepreneurs; State legal mechanism of rights protection; Legal responsibility of the state; business ombudsman
Bibliography :
1. Vitruk N. V. General theory of legal position of a personality, Moscow, NORMA: INFRA-M, 2008, 448 p. (in Russ.).
2. Issues of protecting subjective civil rights: sb. nauch. tr., ed. V. V. Butnev, Yarosl. gos. un-t, Yaroslavl, YarGU, 2009, No. 10, 118 p. (in Russ.).
3. Bauer F. Lehrbuch des Sachenrechts, Munich und Berlin, 1996, p. 120.
4. Hufen F. Verwaltungsprozessrecht, C. H. Beck, 1996, p. 18.
5. Schwab K. N., Prütting H. Sachenrecht. Ein Studienbuch. 26 Aufl, Munich, 1996, p. 130.
6. Bludov A. M. Foreign experience of regulating entrepreneurial activity: issues of adaptation, Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsess, 2011, No. 3–4, pp. 31–35 (in Russ.).
7. Bushev A. Yu., Makarova O. A., Popondopulo V. F. Commercial law of foreign countries, Saint Petersburg, 2003, 288 p. (in Russ.).
8. Kirichek E. V. Formation and development of rights and freedoms of a person and citizen: philosophical-legal dimension, Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika, 2011, No. 2 (16), pp. 13–22 (in Russ.).
9. Savvateev V. Yu. Issues of protecting entrepreneurs’ rights in public relations, Topical issues of specific legal regulation: Works of the 6th International scientific conference of young researchers, sb. nauch. statei, Samara, Univers-grupp, 2006, pp. 88–89 (in Russ.).
10. Romanova V. V. Legal liability of a state, Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika, 2016, No. 3 (37), pp. 23–30 (in Russ.).
11. Gribanov V. P. Limits of implementation and protection of civil rights, Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav, Moscow, Statut, 2001, 411 p. (in Russ.).
12. Bogdanova E. E. Forms and means of protecting civil rights and interests, Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 2003, No. 6, pp. 39–45 (in Russ.).
13. Ripinskii S. Yu. Property liability of a state for the damage caused to entrepreneurs, Saint Petersburg, Yurid. tsentr Press, 2002, 229 p. (in Russ.).
14. Nuriev A. Kh. Special conditions of the state liability for the damage caused to entrepreneurs, Actual problems of economics and law, 2011, No. 3 (19), pp. 218–222 (in Russ.).
15. Yaroshenko K. B. Some problems occurring during disputes on reimbursing the damage caused by the state bodies, local self-government bodies, or their officials, Kommentarii sudebnoi praktiki, No. 21, Moscow, Infra-M, 2016, pp. 3–14 (in Russ.).
16. Belousov D. Yu. Features of forming in some foreign countries of the institution of regressive liabilities in regard to officials of public bodies in relation to reimbursement of damage caused by the state acitivities, Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve, 2010, No. 4, pp. 136–138 (in Russ.).
17. Chubenko I. S. Prosecutor’s supervision over implementation of laws in the sphere of support to small and middle businesses, PhD (Law) thesis, Moscow, 2013, 29 p. (in Russ.).
18. Ivanova A. A. Corruption in the sphere of Russian entrepreneurship, Actual problems of economics and law, 2013, No. 3 (27), pp. 204–211 (in Russ.).
19. Palamarchuk A. V. Topical issues of Prosecutor’s supervision over implementation of federal legislation, Moscow, Gen. prokuratura Ros. Federatsii, 2014, 328 p. (in Russ.).
20. Chubenko I. S. Institutional decisions in the sphere of protecting entrepreneurs’ rights: ombudsman or a special prosecutor, Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve, 2012, No. 3, pp. 223–226 (in Russ.).
21. Gromozdina M. V., Tokareva E. V., Chupina A. M. Problem aspects of the issue of protecting entrepreneurs’ rights, Innovatsionnaya nauka, 2016, No. 12–2, pp. 158–161 (in Russ.).
22. Smirnov N., Alizada Ya. Institution of business ombudsman in Russia: legal position, economic effects, anticorruption potential, Obshchestvo i ekonomika, 2014, No. 2/3, pp. 207–227 (in Russ.).
Citation :
Abakumova E. B. State-legal protection of entrepreneurs’ rights in public legal relations, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2018, vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 828–841 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.12.2018.4.828-841
Type of article : The scientific article
Date of receipt of the article :
24.07.2018
Date of adoption of the print :
10.11.2018
Date of online accommodation :
25.12.2018
