скачать PDF
Authors : 1. Beth A. Colgan,
assistant professor of Law
UCLA School of Law
Fines, fees, and forfeiture
Objective: to analyze the imposition and collections of fines, fees, and forfeitures according to the legislation of the United States of America).
Methods: dialectical approach to the cognition of social phenomena, allowing to analyze them in the historical development and functioning in the context of a set of objective and subjective factors, which determined the choice of the following research methods: formal-logical, comparative-legal, and sociological.
Results: the use of fines, fees, and forfeitures has expanded significantly in recent years as lawmakers have sought to fund criminal justice systems without raising taxes. Concerns are growing, however, that inadequately designed systems for the use of such economic sanctions have problematic policy outcomes, such as the distortion of criminal justice priorities, exacerbation of financial vulnerability of people living at or near poverty, increased crime, jail overcrowding, and even decreased revenue. In addition, the imposition and collections of fines, fees, and forfeitures in many jurisdictions are arguably unconstitutional, and therefore create the risk of often costly litigation. This article provides an overview of those policy and constitutional problems and provides several concrete solutions for reforming the use of fines, fees, and forfeitures.
Scientific novelty: for the first time, the article substantiates the necessity to eliminate poverty penalties and other policies that negatively impact ability to pay. It is proposed to create systems for meaningful consideration of financial effect of fines, fees and forfeitures; to develop non-incarcerative alternative sanctions; to restrict the use of fines, fees, and forfeitures in cases involving juveniles; to ensure that criminal justice actors are insulated from the pressure to generate revenue and from the benefits of revenue produced from those economic sanctions.
Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in scientific and educational activities when considering the issues related to imposition of fines, fees, and forfeitures.
Keywords :
Fine; Fee; Forfeiture; Reform of criminal law; Fines; Asset forfeiture; Criminal justice reform vulnerability of the poor; Litigation
Bibliography :
1. Carpenter D. M., Knepper L., Erickson A. C., McDonald J. Policing for profit: The abuse of civil asset forfeiture (2nd ed.), 2015, available at: http://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit/
2. Colgan B. A. Reviving the excessive fines clause, California Law Review, 2014, Vol. 102, No. 2, pp. 277–350.
3. Fines, fees, and bail, Council for Economic Advisors, 2015, available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/page/files/1215ceafinefeebailissue_brief.pdf
4. Martin K. D., Smith S. S., Still W. Shackled to debt: Criminal justice financial obligations and the barriers to re-entry they create, 2017, available at: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/249976.pdf
5. Criminal Justice Policy Program, Confronting criminal justice departments: A Guide for policy reform, Harvard Law School, 2016, available at: http://cjpp.law.harvard.edu/assets/Confronting-Crim-Justice-Debt-Guide-to-Policy-Reform-FINAL.pdf
6. Profiting from probation: America’s “offender funded” probation industry, Human Rights Watch, 2014, available at: https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/02/05/profiting-probation/americas-offender-funded-probation-industry#page
7. Benson B. L. Escalating the war on drugs: Causes and unintended consequences, Stanford Law and Policy Review, 2009, Vol. 20, pp. 293–358.
8. Logan W. A. The shadow criminal law of municipal governance, Ohio State Law Journal, 2001, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 1409–1472.
9. Sallah M., O’Harrow R., Jr., Rich S., Silverman G. Stop and seize, The Washington Post, 2014, September 6, available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2014/09/06/stop-and-seize/?utm_term=.4cd0793fd067
10. Bannon A., Diller R., Nagrecha M. Criminal justice debt: A barrier to reentry, 2010, available at: https://www.brennancenter.org/publication/criminal-justice-debt-barrier-reentry
11. Feierman J., Goldstein N., Haney-Caron E., Columbo J. F. Debtors’ prison for kids? The high cost of fines and fees in the juvenile justice system, Juvenile Law Center, 2016, available at: http://debtorsprison.jlc.org/documents/JLC-Debtors-Prison.pdf
12. O’Hara R., Sallah M. Police intelligence targets cash, The Washington Post, 2014, September 7, available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2014/09/07/police-intelligence-targets-cash/?utm_term=.5da4381a1930
13. O’Hara R., Sallah M. They fought the law, who won?, The Washington Post, 2014, Sep. 8, available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2014/09/08/they-fought-the-law-who-won/?utm_term=.36b0f0d5f048
14. Shapiro J. As court fees rise, the poor are paying the price, NPR, 2014, May 19, available at: http://www.npr.org/2014/05/19/312158516/increasing-court-fees-punish-the-poor
15. Shapiro J. Supreme Court rules not enough to prevent debtors’ prisons, NPR, 2014, May 21, available at: http://www.npr.org/2014/05/21/313118629/supreme-court-ruling-not-enough-to-prevent-debtors-prisons
16. Stillman S. Taken, The New Yorker, 2013, August 12, available at: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/08/12/taken
17. Stillman S. Get out of jail, Inc., The New Yorker, 2014, June 23, available at: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/06/23/get-out-of-jail-inc
18. In for a penny: The rise of America’s new debtors’ prisons, American Civil Liberties Union, 2010, available at: https://www.aclu.org/report/penny-rise-americas-new-debtors-prisons
19. Resolution on criminal justice fines and fees, American Legislative Exchange Council, 2016, available at: https://www.alec.org/model-policy/resolution-on-criminal-justice-fines-and-fees/
20. Ingraham C. How police took $53,000 from a Christian band, and orphanage, and a church, The Washington Post, 2016, April 25, available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/04/25/how-oklahoma-cops-took-53000-from-aburmese-christian-band-a-church-in-omaha-and-an-orphanage-in-thailand/?utm_term=.2b9e0b6ecd82
21. Bingham S., Calhoun S., Case A., Christensen G., Della- Piana E., Zhen T. Not just a Ferguson problem: How traffic courts drive inequality in California, Lawyers’ Commission for Civil Rights, 2015, available at: http://www.lccr.com/wp-content/uploads/Not-Just-a-Ferguson-Problem-How-Traffic-Courts-Drive-Inequality-in-California-4.20.15.pdf
22. Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department, U.S. Department of Justice, 2015, available at: https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf
23. Gilles M. E. In defense of making government pay: The deterrent effect of constitutional tort remedies, Georgia Law Review, 2001, Vol. 35, pp. 845–880.
24. Levinson D. J. Making government pay: Markets, politics, and the allocation of constitutional costs, The University of Chicago Law Review, 2000, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 345–420.
25. Schwartz J. C. How governments pay: Lawsuits, budgets, and police reform, UCLA Law Review, 2016, Vol. 63, No. 5, pp. 1–147.
26. Garrett T. A., Wagner G. A. Red ink in the review mirror: Local fiscal conditions and the issuance of traffic tickets, The Journal of Law and Economics, 2009, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 71–90.
27. Blumenson E., Nilsen E. Policing for profit: The drug war’s hidden economic agenda, The University of Chicago Law Review, 1998, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 35–114.
28. Claramella C. J. Poor neighborhoods hit hardest by asset forfeiture in Chicago, data shows, Reason, 2017, June 13, available at: http://reason.com/blog/2017/06/13/poor-neighborhoods-hit-hardest-by-asset
29. Fagan J. Race and the new policing, Reforming criminal justice: A report of the Academy for Justice on bridging the gap between scholarship and reform, ed. E. Luna, Phoenix, AZ, Academy for Justice, 2017, pp. 83–116.
30. Bowers J. Legal guilt, normative innocence, and the equitable decision not to prosecute, Columbia Law Review, 2010, Vol. 110, No. 7, pp. 1655–1726.
31. Mast B. D., Benson B. L., Rasmussen D. W. Entrepreneurial police and drug enforcement policy, Public Choice, 2000, Vol. 104, No. 3–4, pp. 285–308. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005183918319
32. Guilty property: How law enforcement takes $1 million in cash from innocent Philadelphians every year – and gets away with it, American Civil Liberties Union, 2015, available at: https://www.aclupa.org/files/3214/3326/0426/Guilty_Property_Report_-_FINAL.pdf
33. O’Hara R., Rich S. Asset seizures fuel police spending, The Washington Post, 2014, October 11, available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2014/10/11/asset-seizures-fuel-police-spending/?utm_term=026a2f51c0eb
34. O’Hara R., Rich S. D.C. police plan for future seizure proceeds year in advance in city budget documents, The Washington Post, 2014, November 15, available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/dc-police-plan-for-future-seizure-proceeds-yearsin-advance-in-city-budget-documents/2014/11/15/7025edd2-6b76-11e4-b053-65cea7903f2e_story.html?utm_term=.4853638de9bb
35. Harmon R. A. Federal programs and the real cost of policing, New York University Law Review, 2015, Vol. 90, pp. 870–960.
36. Sibilla N. Civil forfeiture now requires a criminal conviction in Montana and New Mexico, Forbes, 2015, July 2, available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/instituteforjustice/2015/07/02/civil-forfeiture-now-requires-a-criminal-conviction-in-montanaand-new-mexico/#2efbcba5ee30
37. Beckett K., Harris A. On cash and conviction: Monetary sanctions as misguided policy, Criminology and Public Policy, 2011, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 509–537.
38. Carbado D. W. Race and the Fourth Amendment, Reforming criminal justice: A report of the Academy for Justice on bridging the gap between scholarship and reform, ed. E. Luna, Phoenix, AZ, Academy for Justice, 2017, pp. 153–184.
39. Colgan B. A. Lessons from Ferguson on individual defense representation as a tool for systematic reform, William and Mary Law Review, 2017, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 1171–1252.
40. Laisne M., Wool J., Henrichson C. Past due: Examining the cost and consequences of charging for justice in New Orleans, 2017, available at: https://storage.googleapis.com/vera-web-assets/downloads/Publications/past-due-costs-consequences-chargingfor-justice-new-orleans/legacy_downloads/past-due-costs-consequences-charging-for-justice-new-orleans.pdf
41. Pawasarat J. The driver license statutes of the voting age population in Wisconsin, 2005, available at: https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/d/download_file_50902.pdf
42. Waller M. High cost or high opportunity cost? Transportation and family economic success, Brookings, 2005, December 2, available at: https://www.brookings.edu/research/high-cost-or-high-opportunity-cost-transportation-and-family-economic-success-2/
43. McLean R. L., Thompson M. D. Repaying debts, 2007, available at: https://victimsofcrime.org/docs/default-source/restitution-toolkit/repaying_debts_full_report.pdf?sfvrsn=2
44. Brown P. Parents’ house seized after son’s drug bust, CNN, 2014, September 8, available at: http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/03/us/philadelphia-drug-bust-house-seizure/index.html
45. Kruger J. G. DEA to traveler: Thanks, I’ll take that cash, Albuquerque Journal, 2015, May 6, available at: https://www.abqjoumal.com/580107/dea-agents-seize-16000-from-aspiring-music-video-producer.html
46. Cook F. The burden of criminal justice debt in Alabama: 2014 participant self-report survey, Jefferson County’s Community Corrections Program, available at: https://www.uab.edu/medicine/substanceabuse/images/The_Burden_of_Criminal_Justice_Debt_in_Alabama-_Part_1_Main_Report.pdf
47. Harris A., Evans H., Beckett K. Drawing blood from stones: Legal debt and social inequality in contemporary United States, American Journal of Sociology, 2010, Vol. 115, No. 6, pp. 1753–1799. DOI: 10.1086/651940
48. Schneider A. L. Restitution and recidivism rates of juvenile offenders: Results from four experimental studies, Criminology, 1986, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 533–552. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1986.tb00389.x
49. Piquero A. R., Jennings W. G. Research note: Justice system-imposed financial penalties increase the likelihood of recidivism in a sample of adolescent offenders, Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2016, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 325–340. DOI: 10.1177/1541204016669213
50. Grogger J. Certainty v. severity of punishment, Economic Inquiry, 1991, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 297–309. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1991.tb01272.x
51. Chin G. J. Collateral consequences of criminal conviction, Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 2017, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 1–16.
52. Fontaine J., Biess J. Housing as a platform for formerly incarcerated individuals, The Urban Institute, 2012, available at: http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/25321/412552-Housing-as-a-Platform-for-Formerly-Incarcerated-Persons.PDF
53. Graffam J., Shinkfield A., Lavelle B., McPherson W. Variables affecting successful reintegration as perceived by offenders and professionals, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 2004, Vol. 40, No. 1–2, pp. 147–171. DOI: 10.1300/J076v40n01_08
54. Roman C. G., Travis J. Taking stock: Housing, homelessness, and prisoner reentry, 2004, available at: http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/58121/411096-Taking-Stock.PDF
55. Lutze F. E., Rosky J. W., Hamilton Z. K. Homelessness and reentry: A multisite outcome evaluation of Washington State’s reentry housing program for high risk offenders, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 2013, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 471–491. DOI: 10.1177/0093854813510164
56. Berg M. T., Huebner B. M. Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism, Justice Quarterly, 2011, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 382–410. DOI: 10.1080/07418825.2010.498383
57. Seyler R. Local ACLU chapter см.ks jail oversight committee, Silver City Sun-News, 2015, July 6, available at: http://www.scsun-news.com/story/news/local/2015/07/06/local-aclu-chapter-см.ks-jail-oversight-committee/71601486/
58. Dolovich S. Prison conditions, Reforming criminal justice: A report of the Academy for Justice on bridging the gap between scholarship and reform, ed. E. Luna, Phoenix, AZ, Academy for Justice, 2017, pp. 261–294.
59. Hall B. Sheriff calls Rutherford county’s probation system a “rat wheel”, News Channel 5 Network, 2016, January 17, available at: http://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/sheriff-calls-rutherford-countys-probation-system-a-rat-wheel
60. Henrichson C., Roberts S., Mai C., Delany- Brumsey A., Laisne M., Davis C., Wilson R. The costs and consequences of bail, fines and fees in New Orleans: Technical report, 2017, available at: https://storage.googleapis.com/vera-web-assets/downloads/
Publications/past-due-costs-consequences-charging-for-justice-new-orleans/legacy_downloads/past-due-costs-consequencescharging-for-justice-new-orleans-technical-report.pdf
61. Dolan S. Taxpayers lose as Maine counties jail indigents over unpaid fines, Portland Press Herald, 2015, May 31, available at: http://www.pressherald.com/2015/05/31/taxpayers-lose-as-maine-counties-jail-indigents-over-unpaid-fines/
62. Stevenson M., Mayson S. G. Pretrial detention and bail, Reforming criminal justice: A report of the Academy for Justice on bridging the gap between scholarship and reform, ed. E. Luna, Phoenix, AZ, Academy for Justice, 2017, pp. 21–48.
63. Patrick R. Judge approves $4.7 million settlement to those jailed for unpaid fines in Jennings, St Louis Post Dispatch, 2016, December 14, available at: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/judge-approves-million-settlement-to-thosejailed-for-unpaid-fines/article_030c999a-00a0-56fb-a006-cda8bb2121b7.html
64. Colgan B. A. The excessive fines clause: Challenging the modern debtors’ prison, UCLA Law Review, 2018, Vol. 65, p. 2.
65. Durham R. B. The cruel and unusual punishments and excessive fines clauses, American Criminal Law Review, 1989, Vol. 26, pp. 1617–1658.
66. McLean N. M. Livelihood, ability to pay, and the original meaning of the excessive fines clause, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 2013, Vol. 40, pp. 833–902.
67. Kolber A. J. The subjective experience of punishment, Columbia Law Review, 2009, Vol. 109, pp. 182–236.
68. Simmons K. W. Retributivists need not and should not endorse the subjectivist account of punishment, Columbia Law Review Sidebar, 2009, Vol. 109, pp. 1–10.
69. Ryan M. J. Taking dignity seriously: Excavating the backdrop of the eighth amendment, University of Illinois Law Review, 2016, pp. 2129–2178.
70. Carter M. S., Adcock C. Prisoners of debt: Justice system imposes steep fines, fees, Oklahoma Watch, 2015, January 31, available at: http://oklahomawatch.org/2015/01/31/justice-system-steeps-many-offenders-in-debt/
71. Brownstone S. Leaked e-mail: What a King County Superior Court judge really thinks about raising the cost of
traffic ticket fines, The Stranger, 2015, May 21, available at: http://www.thestranger.com/blogs/slog/2015/05/21/22255032/leaked-e-mail-what-a-king-county-superior-court-judge-really-thinks-about-raising-the-cost-of-traffic-ticket-fines
72. Bourdeaux D. J., Pritchard A. C. Innocence lost: Bennis v. Michigan and the forfeiture tradition, Missouri Law Review, 1996, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 593–632.
73. Nelson C. The constitutionality of civil forfeiture, Yale Law Journal, 2016, Vol. 125, No. 8, pp. 2182–2555.
74. Eaglin J. M. Improving economic sanctions in the States, Minnesota Law Review, 2015, Vol. 99, pp. 1837–1870.
75. Sobol N. L. Charging the poor: Criminal justice debt & modern-day debtors’ prisons, Maryland Law Review, 2016, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 486–540.
76. King J. D. Beyond “life and liberty”: The evolving right to counsel, Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review, 2013, Vol. 48, pp. 1–49.
77. Colgan B. A. Paying for Gideon, Iowa Law Review, 2014, Vol. 99, pp. 1929–1949.
78. Anderson H. A. Penalizing poverty: Making criminal defendants pay for their court-appointed counsel through recoupment and contribution, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2009, Vol. 42, pp. 323–380.
79. Wright R. F., Logan W. A. The political economy of application fees for indigent criminal defense, William and Mary Law Review, 2006, Vol. 47, pp. 2045–2087.
80. Natapoff A. Misdemeanors, Reforming criminal justice: A report of the Academy for Justice on bridging the gap between scholarship and reform, ed. E. Luna, Phoenix, AZ, Academy for Justice, 2017, pp. 71–98.
81. Colgan B. A. Graduating economic sanctions according to ability to pay, Iowa Law Review, 2017, Vol. 103, pp. 53–112.
82. McDonald D. C., Green J., Worzella C. Day fines in American courts: The Staten Island and Milwaukee experiments, 1992, available at: https://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/1992-day-fines-in-Staten-Island-Milwaukee.pdf
83. National Association of Crime Victim Compensation Boards, 2017, available at: http://www.nacvcb. org/index. asp?sid=6
84. Tonry M. Community punishment, Reforming criminal justice: A report of the Academy for Justice on bridging the gap between scholarship and reform, ed. E. Luna, Phoenix, AZ, Academy for Justice, 2017, pp. 187–204.
85. Turner S., Petersilia J. Day fines in four U.S. jurisdictions, RAND Corporation, 1996, available at: https://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/1996-RAND-day-fines-4-BJA-pilot-sites.pdf
86. Edin K. J., Shaefer L. $2.00 a day: Living on almost nothing in America, New York, NY, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2016.
87. Zatz N. Get to work or go to jail: Free labor in the shadow of mass incarceration, АCSBlog, 2015, November 16, available at: https://www.acslaw.org/acsblog/get-to-work-or-go-to-jail-free-labor-in-the-shadow-of-mass-incarceration
88. Benefit-cost results, Washington State Institute for Public Policy, 2016, available at: http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/BenefitCost
89. Making families pay: The harmful, unlawful, and costly practice of charging juvenile administrative fees in California, Policy Advocacy Clinic, 2017, available at: http://wclp.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/State-Juvenile-Fees-Report.pdf
90. Charles Koch, ACUL form unusual alliance in pushing states to overhaul asset forfeiture rules, Access WDUN, The Associated Press, 2015, October 15, available at: http://accesswdun.com/article/2015/10/342669
91. Worrall J. L. Addicted to the drug war: The role of civil asset forfeiture as a budgetary necessity in contemporary law enforcement, Journal of Criminal Justice, 2001, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 171–187. DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2352(01)00082-4
92. Primus E. B. Defense counsel and public defense, Reforming criminal justice: A report of the Academy for Justice on bridging the gap between scholarship and reform, ed. E. Luna, Phoenix, AZ, Academy for Justice, 2017, pp. 121–146.
93. Earl J. Civil asset forfeiture: Fund public defenders instead of the police, The Hill, 2017, February 15, available at: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/crime/319632-civil-asset-forfeiture-fund-public-defenders-instead-of-the-police
94. Colgan B. A. Fines, fees, and forfeitures, Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, Vol. 18, Iss. 3, pp. 22–40.
Original publication: https://ccjls.scholasticahq.com/article/2722-fnes-fees-and-forfeitures
Citation :
Colgan B. A. Fines, fees, and forfeiture, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2018, vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 640–659. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.12.2018.3.640-659
Type of article : The scientific article
Date of receipt of the article :
23.07.2018
Date of adoption of the print :
29.08.2018
Date of online accommodation :
25.09.2018
