по-русски

Actual Problems of
Economics and Law

 

16+

 

DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.11.2017.3.5-15

скачать PDF

Authors :
1. Elena V. Kamko, junior Researcher
Institute for Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences



Interaction of science, business and state in the sphere of innovative projects development: comparative analysis by the example of Russia, USA and China


Objective: to study the organizational principles of institutional mechanisms in innovation sphere which are capable of maintaining and developing the interaction of science, state and business.


Methods: general scientific principles of economic phenomena cognition, such as dialectical, structural, historical approaches, which allowed us to evaluate the institutional structures and mechanisms, to reveal their inherent qualities and structure, and to identify trends in their historical and future development. The specificity of the institutions, which characterizes the individual companies, was considered on the basis of comparative institutional analysis, drawing on the institutional concept of the X- and Y-economies. Justification of the practical conclusions was made on the basis of theoretical analysis and generalization of the actual historical examples of innovative breakthroughs, both in Russia and abroad.


Results: institutional characteristics of interaction between science, state and business in Russia, USA and China were analyzed. Investigation of the projects associated with innovation breakthroughs: innovation center "Skolkovo" (Russia), Silicon Valley (USA) and Technopark "Zhongguancun" (China), revealed the specificity and established cause-and-effect relations in the formation of institutional mechanisms that are present in their implementation. As a result, it was determined that the effectiveness of institutional mechanisms for the innovative projects implementation is connected with such combination of the implemented institutions, which reflects the dominant position of the institutional matrix of the society in which these projects are implemented.


Scientific novelty: for the first time on the basis of the institutional concepts of the X- and Y-economies, the cause-and-effect relations in the formation of institutional mechanisms for innovative areas in different countries were investigated.


Practical significance: the results and conclusions of the article can be used in scientific and teaching activities in terms of issues concerning the essence and principles of innovative projects formation, as well as by specialists of public agencies for the development of innovative strategy of the country.


Keywords :

Economics and national economy management; Innovative project; Institutional mechanism; Institutional macrostructure


Bibliography :

1. Kamko E. V. Conception of innovative breakthrough taking into account the institutional macrostructure, Zhurnal
ekonomicheskoj teorii, 2014, No. 3, pp. 195–199 (in Russ.).
2. Bessonova O. Je. Institutions of the Russia’s distributing economy: retrospective analysis, Novosibirsk: IJeiOPP, 1997, 76 p. (in Russ.).
3. Drozdova N. P. On the institutional analysis of the Russian economy, Ekonomist, 2012, No. 11, pp. 91–96 (in Russ.).
4. Inshakov O. V. Collaboration as a global form of organization of the knowledge economy, Ekonomika regiona, 2013, No. 3, pp. 38–45 (in Russ.).
5. Kirdina S. G. Institutional matrixes and development of Russia. Introduction into X-Y theory, Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istorija, 2014, 468 p. (in Russ.).
6. Lebedeva N. N., Averina I. S., Zadorozhneva Ju. V. Infrastructure development as a condition for improvement of the innovative activity stimulation mechanism (on example of subject SFD), Vestnik VolGU. Serija 3. Ekonomika. Ekologija, 2015, No. 4, pp. 66–77 (in Russ.).
7. North D. C. Structure and Change in Economic History, N.-Y.: Northon, 1981, 228 p.
8. Popov E. V., Vlasov M. V. Systematization of mini-economic institutions of new knowledge production, Ekonomicheskaja nauka sovremennoj Rossii, 2008, No. 2 (41), pp. 46–54 (in Russ.).
9. Frolov D. P. Do institutions matter for the special economy?, Prostranstvennaja ekonomika, 2015, No. 1, pp. 14–37 (in Russ.).
10. Ebner A. Entrepreneurial State: The Schumpeterian Theory of Industrial Policy and the East Asian “Miracle”, Schumpeterian Perspectives on Innovation, Competition, and Growth. Cantner, Berlin: Springer, 2009, pp. 369–390.
11. Luk'janchikov G., Shhukin A. From technoparks to cities of science, Ekspert, 2010, No. 48 (732), pp. 33–34 (in Russ.).
12. Judin G. “Economical and “social”: autonomy of spheres and disciplinary limits, Voprosy ekonomiki, 2010, No. 8, pp. 54–71 (in Russ.).
13. Rassadina I. I. Research of the modern markets, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 2006, No. 4, pp. 101–120 (in Russ.).
14. Silicon Valley Index. 2016, available at: http://www.jointventure.org/images/stories/pdf/index2016.pdf (access date: 23.05.2017).
15. Revuckij S. Basic prerequisites and common features of development of technology parks in highly developed countries of the world, Teorija i praktika intellektual'noj sobstvennosti. Elektronnyj zhurnal, 2009, No. 1, available at: http// ndiiv.org.ua/ru/journal-archive.html (access date: 04.06.2016) (in Russ.).

16. Harayama Y. Private incentive and the role of government in technology advancement: Silicon Valley, Stanford University and the federal government. 1998, available at: http://web.stenford.edu./dept/HPS/TimLenoir/SiliconValley99/Harayama/SVResearch.pdf (access date: 21.06.2016).
17. Kamko E. V. On the increasing efficiency of the Russian innovative sphere, Phenomenon of the increasing efficiency in economy and politics, Saint Petersburg: Aletejja, 2014, pp. 107–130 (in Russ.).
18. Chen J. The Role of Venture Capital in China’s Technology Entrepreneurship Development, Management of Technology Program. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2003, available at: https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/29717/54032006-MIT.pdf?sequence=2 (access date: 20.06.2016).
19. Zhou L., Feng H. A Research Report on the Performance and Problems of University-Owned Firms in the Zhongguancun Science Park. 2004, available at: http://iis-db.stanford.edu/evnts/4097/MLZhao_University-Owned_Firms_in_Zhongguancun.pdf (access date: 18.06.2016).
20. Tan J. Growth of industry clusters and innovation: Lessons from Beijing Zhongguancun Science Park, Journal of Business Venturing, 2006, No. 21, pp. 827–850.
21. Shhukin A. Technopark of overtaking development, Ekspert, 2010, No. 41, available at: http://expert.ru/expert/2010/41/tehnopark_dogonyayuschego_razvitiya/ (access date: 15.06.2016) (in Russ.).
22. China venture capital. Industry report 2012, available at: www.vcpe.org.cn/.../FileDowload?file=/2013 (access date: 16.06.2016).
23. Grant policy of the Non-profit organization “Foundation for Development” of the Center for developing and commerzialization of new technologies # 44-Ф-Р of 10.08.2012, available at: http://community.sk.ru/foundation/documents/ (access date: 16.06.2016) (in Russ.).
24. Chamber of Accounts has checked “Skolkovo” Innovative Center, 2013, available at: http://www.ach.gov.ru/activities/control/267/ (access date: 17.06.2016) (in Russ.).
25. Hantington S. Political order in changing societies, Moscow: Progress-Tradicija, 2004, 480 p. (in Russ.).
26. Bulletin # 9 of the Russian Chamber of Accounts has been published, available at: http://www.ach.gov.ru/press_center/news/28157?sphrase_id=4109306 (access date: 22.05.2017) (in Russ.).
27. Yearly report of “Skolkovo” Innovative Center for 2016, available at: http://sk.ru/foundation/results/annual_reports_ru/ (access date: 21.05.2017) (in Russ.).
28. Osipov G. V., Moskvichev L. N. Dictionary of Sociology, Moscow: INFRA-M, 2010, 608 p. (in Russ.).
29. David P. A. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review, 1985, vol. 75, No. 2, available at: http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/birolo/materiale_corso/internet/David_QWERTY.pdf (access date: 15.07.2016).


Citation :

Kamko E. V. Interaction of science, business and state in the sphere of innovative projects development:
comparative analysis by the example of Russia, USA and China, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2017, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 5–15 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.11.2017.3.5-15


Type of article : The scientific article

Date of receipt of the article :
31.05.2017

Date of adoption of the print :
05.07.2017

Date of online accommodation :
25.09.2017