скачать PDF
Authors : 1. Edward L. Rubin,
Professor of Law and Political Science
Vanderbilt University Law School, Nashville, TN, USA
The dominance of norm
Objective: to revisit the debate about rational choice theory from the legal, cultural and historical perspectives.
Methods: dialectic approach to the cognition of social phenomena, allowing to analyze them in their historical development and functioning in the context of the integrity of subjective and objective factors; this determines the choice of the research methods: systemic-structural, formal-legal, and comparative.
Results: The first part of this chapter will explain the way in which people in societies different from our own were subject to other motivations in situations where self-interest would tend to dominate in our society. The reasoning is based on three examples, one drawn from the history of Ancient Rome, one from the High Middle Ages of the European society, and one from a contemporary non-Western culture. The second part of the chapter analyzes the reason why material self-interest maximizing became a dominant motivation in the modern Western society. The works on historical sociology attribute this development to Calvinism, but this hypothesis suffers from some serious defects. In the article we prove that the modern sensibility resulted from much longer-acting trends, specifically secularization, urbanization and commercialization. The final section of the chapter explores the relationship between the West’s prevailing norm of self-interest maximization and the particular norms that have been discussed in microeconomic theory. It argues that some of these norms are internal to the prevailing one, and are thus explicable in terms of material self-interest, but that others reflect additional norms in the general society that exist alongside, and sometimes in competition with, the prevailing norm of self-interest maximization. The historically-based view that self-interest maximizing is a prevailing norm, rather than a human universal, allows these other norms to be acknowledged in a plausible and realistic manner, rather than being explained away by a Procrustean, and ultimately unconvincing effort to fit them into a unitary model of human motivation.
Scientific novelty: the article proves that material self-interest maximizing is a prevailing norm in our society, determining a good deal of observed behavior. However, because it is a norm, and not a human universal, it can be readily altered or alloyed by other norms when circumstances render those considerations operative. Thus, behavior that cannot be explained as rational choice should not be regarded as enigmatic lapses into irrationality. Rather, it represents the natural interplay of varying attitudes that any complex society displays, the range of behavior resources that individuals within such a society will naturally draw upon in daily life. Each particular motive may require explanation, but the fact that they are mixed together does not.
Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in scientific and pedagogical activity when considering the issues of the legal behavior of the humans.
Keywords :
Law; Economics; Rational choice; Microeconomics theory; Prevailing norm; Public norm
Bibliography :
1. Cooter R. The Best Right Laws: Value Foundations of the Economic Analysis of Law, Notre Dame Law Review, 1989, vol. 64, pp. 817–837.
2. Dau-Schmidt K. Economics and Sociology: The Prospects for an Interdisciplinary Discourse on Law, Wisconsin Law Review, 1997, pp. 389–420.
3. Posner E. Law and Social Norms, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002.
4. Ellickson R. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994.
5. Green D., Shapiro I. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1994.
6. Brown S., Brown R., Penner L. Moving Beyond Self-Interest: Perspectives from Evolutionary Biology, Neuroscience, and the Social Sciences, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
7. Mansbridgc J. Beyond Self-interest, Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
8. Rubin E. Soul. Self and Society: The New Morality and the Modern State. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
9. Weber M. The Protestant Ethic and the "Spirit" of Capitalism, Los Angeles: Roxbury, 2002 [1904–05].
10. Tawney R. H. Religion and the Rise of Capitalism, New York: Mentor Books, 1954.
11. Ferejohn J. Rationality and interpretation: parliamentary elections in early Stuart England, The Economic Approach to Politics: A Critical Reassessment of the Theory of Rational Action, ed. Monroe K., New York: Harper Collins, 1991.
12. Dante A. The Divine Comedy, New York: New American Library, 2003.
13. Frankfurt H. The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays, Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
14. Dostoyevsky F. Crime and Punishment, New York: Dell Publishing, 1959 [1866].
15. Hardin R. Magic on the frontier: the norm of efficiency, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1996, vol. 144, pp. 1987–2020.
16. Kuran T. Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.
17. Coleman J. Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1990.
18. Veyne P. The Roman Empire, A History of Private Life, ed. Veyne P., Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press, 1987.
19. The World of Athens: An Introduction to Classical Athenian Culture, Joint Association of Classical Teachers, Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
20. Ober J. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology and the Power of the People, Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1989.
21. Bringmann K. A History of the Roman Republic, Cambridge, Eng.: Polity Press, 2007.
22. Gruen E. Rome and the Greek world, in Flower H. The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
23. Wells C. The Roman Empire, 2nd, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992.
24. Heather P. The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians, Oxford, Eng.: Oxford University Press, 2006.
25. Blair P. Roman Britain and Early England, 55 B.C. – A.D. 871, New York: W.W. Norton, 1963.
26. Aristotle The Athenian Constitution, The Works of Aristotle, Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952.
27. Fox R. L. Pagans and Christians, New York: Harper & Row, 1986.
28. Brown P. The World of Late Antiquity, New York: W.W. Norton, 1989.
29. Wickham C. The Inheritance of Rome: Illuminating the Dark Ages 400–1000, New York: Viking, 2009.
30. Salway P. Roman Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.
31. Geary P. Before France and Germany: The Creation and Transformation of the Merovingian World, Oxford, Eng.: Oxford University Press, 1988.
32. Goldsworthy A. How Rome Fell: Death of a Superpower, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2009.
33. Adams H. Mont Saint Michel and Chartres, New York: Penguin, 1986 [1904].
34. Simson O. The Gothic Cathedral: Origins of Gothic Architecture and the Medieval Concept of Order, 3rd ed., Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1988.
35. Cantor N. The Civilization of the Middle Ages, New York: Harper Perennial, 1994.
36. Markale J. Courtly Love: The Path of Sexual Initiation, Rochester, Vt.: Inner Traditions, 1987.
37. Turnbull C. The Forest People, New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc., 1968.
38. Turnbull C. The Mountain People, New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc., 1972.
39. Heine B. The mountain people: some notes on the Ik of Northern Uganda, Africa, 1985, vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 3–16.
40. Musasizi S. Meet the Ik: Karamoja’s original tribe on the verge of extinction, 2013, available at: http://observer.ug/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=27912:meet-the-ik-karamojas-original-tribe-on-verge-of-extinction&catid=73:highlights&Itemid=70.
41. Berger P. L., Luckmann T. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, NY: First Anchor, 1966.
42. Goodman N. Ways of Worldmaking, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1978.
43. Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action, Boston: Beacon Press, 1987.
44. Winch P. The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.
45. Finley M. I. The World of Odysseus, New York: Viking Press, 1965.
46. MacIntyre A. After Virtue, 2nd ed., Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.
47. Lewis D. God’s Crucible: Islam and the Making of the Europe, 570–1215, New York: W.W. Norton, 2008.
48. Ward-Perkins B. The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilization, Oxford, Eng.: Oxford University Press, 2005.
49. Le Goff J. Merchant’s time and church’s time in the Middle Ages, Time, Work and Culture in the Middle Ages, ed. LeGoff J., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
50. Le Goff J. Licit and illicit trades in the Medieval West, 1980.
51. Schama S. The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age, New York: Vintage Books, 1997.
52. Troeltsch E. Protestantism and Progress: A Historical Study of the Relation of Protestantism to the Modern World, New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1912.
53. Godfrey W. John Calvin: Pilgrim and Pastor, Wheaton, Ill.: Crossways Books, 2009.
54. Gordon B. Calvin, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2009.
55. Lopez R. The Birth of Europe, New York: M. Evans & Co, 1966.
56. Pirenne H. Mohammed and Charlemagne, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1954.
57. Bartlett R. The Making of Europe: Conquest, Colonization and Cultural Change 950–1350, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1993.
58. Gies J., Gies F. Life in a Medieval City, New York: Harper & Row, 1969.
59. Mundy J., Riesenberg P. The Medieval Town, Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand Co., 1958.
60. Pirenne H. Medieval Cities: Their Origins and the Revival of Trade, Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1952.
61. Hay D. Europe in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966.
62. Elias N. The Civilizing Process, Oxford, Eng.: Blackwell, 1994 [1939].
63. Ogg D. Europe in the Seventeenth Century, New York: Collier Books, 1960.
64. Hay D. Europe in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries, London: Longman, 1989.
65. Renouard Y. The Avignon Papacy 1305–1403, London: Faber and Faber, 1970.
66. MacCulloch D. The Reformation: A History, New York: Penguin Books, 2003.
67. Skinner Q. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
68. Gay P. The Enlightenment: The Rise of Modern Paganism, New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1977.
69. Bruce S. God is Dead: Secularization in the West, Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing, 2002.
70. Chadwick O. The Secularization of the European Mind in the 19th Century, Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 1975.
71. Herman A. How the Scots Invented the Modern World, New York: Three Rivers Press, 2001.
72. Himmelfarb G. The Roads to Modernity: The British, French, and American Enlightenments, New York: Vintage, 2005.
73. Smith A. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Oxford, Eng.: Oxford University Press, 1976 [1959].
74. Smith A. The Wealth of Nations: Books I–III, London: Penguin Books, 1986 [1776].
75. Mandeville B. The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices, Publick Benefits, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc., 1988 [1724].
76. Rubin E. Beyond Camelot: Rethinking Politics and Law for the Modern State, Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2005.
77. Bernstein L. Opting out of the legal system: extra-legal contractual relations in the diamond industry, Journal of Legal Studies, 1992, vol. 21, pp. 115–157.
78. Bernstein L. Merchant law in a merchant court: rethinking the code's search for immanent business norms, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1996, vol. 144, pp. 1765–1821.
Original publication: https://www.routledge.com/Law-and-Economics-Philosophical-Issues-and-Fundamental-Questions/Hatzis-Mercuro/p/book/9781138081628
Citation :
Rubin E. L. The dominance of norm, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2017, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 199–219. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.11.2017.2.199-219
Type of article : The scientific article
Date of receipt of the article :
26.12.2016
Date of adoption of the print :
30.01.2017
Date of online accommodation :
25.06.2017
