Actual Problems of
Economics and Law




DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.11.2017.2.83-99

скачать PDF

Authors :
1. Tatyana V. Svishchuk, Head of the Department of Organizing and Implementing the state procurements
The Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Crimea

2. Gulnara T. Gafurova, PhD (Economics), Associate Professor of the “Finance and Credit” Department
Kazan Innovative University named after V. G. Timiryasov (IEML)

Estimating the efficiency of procurements of state customer The Republic of Crimea under its reunification with the Russian Federation

Objective: to analyze the procurements of the executive authority of the Republic of Crimea in the transition period and to evaluate their effectiveness.

Methods: the study used the methods of grouping, vertical and horizontal analysis, economic-mathematical modeling.

Results: after the Republic of Crimea disconnection from the Ukraine and subsequent accession to the Russian Federation, the state customers in the region were in a difficult situation due to the adaptation of the existing procurement system to the Russian legislation norms. Basing on the data of the Republic of Crimea Ministry of Justice, the authors analyzed the state procurement across all stages of changing the legal field for the customers of the Republic. On the basis of the study, it is concluded that under the Ukrainian legislation the bulk of procurements was carried out without competitive procedures, while the remaining purchases showed the low level of savings. We also revealed the increase of procurement procedures complexity after the Republic accession to the Russian Federation, while during the transition period the customers made procurements
according to a simplified procedure. The analysis of the procurement effectiveness for the customer showed that, as a result of legislative changes, the number and value of competitive procurements significantly increased, as well as the saving rate of tenders and auctions. On the basis of correlation-regression model the authors have proved the hypothesis that number of the procurement participants has an effect on the savings rate. As a result, the necessity of increasing the number of competitive procurements was substantiated, since the number of participants directly affects the savings rate in the course of bidding.

Scientific novelty: on the basis of the analysis, the authors showed a positive economic effect from the changes in the legal framework of public procurement for a particular customer – the Republic of Crimea, which was manifested in the growth of savings rate and the number of competitive procedures. With economic-mathematical methods the authors proved the hypothesis that the saving rate increased following the results of procurement procedures, if the number of participants of the auctions and tenders increased. According to the results of the analysis, proposals for improving the contract procurement system are formulated.

Practical significance: the proposed recommendations can be used by state customers and public authorities in procurement procedures and changes in laws and regulations in the field of public procurement with the aim of improving the efficiency of the contract system.

Keywords :

Economics and national economy management; State procurement; Contract procurement system; State contracting authority; Republic of Crimea; Procurement efficiency

Bibliography :

1. Kuznetsov K. Key problems of creating a contract system in the Russian Federation, available at: http://kkuznetsov.ru/44-fz-problems.pdf (access date: 09.08.2016) (in Russ.).
2. Kuznetsov K. 3rd All-Russia practical seminar “Corporate procurements 2015: practice of implementation of Federal Law No. 223-ФЗ”. Moscow, April 3–4, 2015 (RICS), pp. 193–198 (in Russ.).
3. Kuznetsov K. Impact of the existing mechanisms of calculation and grounding of the initial (maximal) contract price on the procurement efficiency, available at: http://kkuznetsov.ru/44-fz-startprice.pdf (access date: 09.08.2016) (in Russ.).
4. Geller A. Ya. Analysis of the development of electronic auction as a tool for state procurements, Obshchestvennye nauki, 2011, No. 2, pp. 191–196 (in Russ.).
5. Geller A. Ya. Federal contract system of procurements for budget and non-budget organizations, Narodnoe khozyaistvo. Voprosy innovatsionnogo razvitiya, 2011, No. 1, pp. 108–111 (in Russ.).
6. Geller A. Ya. State procurements: how to make the system transparent?, Rossiiskoe predprinimatel'stvo, 2011, No. 7–2, pp. 9–14 (in Russ.).
7. Starovoitov V. G., Tyutyunnik I. G. Contract system as a form of efficient distribution of budget funds in the Russian system of state procurements, Vestnik universiteta (Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya), 2013, No. 19, pp. 217–221 (in Russ.).
8. Shikalova E. V. Estimating the efficiency of state procurements system in the form of contract system as a new institutional environment, Aktual'nye problemy sovremennosti: nauka i obshchestvo, 2015, No. 2, pp. 30–32 (in Russ.).
9. Fisunov K. V. Estimating the efficiency of state procurements implementation in the contract system of the Russian Federation, Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya, 2014, No. 20, pp. 79–81 (in Russ.).
10. Stanyakin S. V. Condition of informational provision of the federal contract system management in the Russian Federation, Ekonomika i sovremennyi menedzhment: teoriya i praktika, 2013, No. 29, pp. 62–67 (in Russ.).
11. Ponomareva S. V., Lesina K. N. Solving the problems of managing the federal contract system in the electric power enterprises, with the system of informational flows, Kontentus, 2015, No. 7 (36), pp. 41–48 (in Russ.).
12. Zolochevskaya E. Yu., Tsymbal V. A. Principle of transparency of state procurements as the basis of public management of the contract system, European Social Science Journal, 2014, No. 6–1 (45), pp. 615–620 (in Russ.).
13. Balantsev E. V. Participation in the procedures of supplier determination in accordance with the legislation on contract system, Sovetnik bukhgaltera gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo uchrezhdeniya, 2014, No. 7 (115), pp. 23–35 (in Russ.).
14. Uvarova A. A. Federal contract system: corruption in the sphere of stae procurement, Nauka i sovremennost', 2014, No. 29, pp. 260–264 (in Russ.).
15. Shaikhutdinova A. R., Selezneva A. Kh. Analysis of the law on contract system for the corruption factor, Ekonomika i sotsium, 2014, No. 2–4 (11), pp. 1127–1128 (in Russ.).
16. Kropacheva I. N., Yugova I. V. Impact of non-price competition on the efficiency of contract system, Ekonomika
i predprinimatel'stvo, 2016, No. 4–1 (69–1), pp. 364–369 (in Russ.).
17. Manushin D. V. Administrative barriers in the Russian economy as the conditions promoting corruption, and measures for their elimination, Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava, 2014, No. 4 (32), pp. 52–60 (in Russ.).
18. Khi V. Thai Public procurement re-examined, Journal of Public Procurement, 2001, vol. 1, is. 1, pp. 9–50.
19. Thai K. V., Grimm R. Government Procurement: Past and Current Developments, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 2000, No. 12 (2), pp. 231–247.
20. Sanchez-Graells A. Are the Procurement Rules a Barrier for Cross-Border Trade within the European Market? A View on Proposals to Lower that Barrier and Spur Growth, Public Procurement Days – Modernization, Innovation and Growth, 2012, February, pp. 9–12.
21. Sanchez-Graells A. Distortions of Competition Generated by the Public (Power) Buyer: A Perceived Gap in EC Competition Law and Proposals to Bridge It. – University of Oxford, Center for Competition Law and Policy, CCLP (L), 23, 73 p.
22. McCue S. Using agency theory to model cooperative public purchasing, Journal of Public Procurement, 2008, No. 8.1, pp. 1–35.
23. Schiele J. J., McCue C. P. Lean thinking and its implications for public procurement: moving forward with assessment and implementation, Journal of Public Procurement, No. 11.2, pp. 206–239.
24. Fetsenko E. N. On the issue of implementation of procurement legislation in the new subjects, Etnosotsium, 2015, No. 12, pp. 175–177 (in Russ.).
25. Klevakin A. V., Rybakova I. Ya. Management of state procurements implementation in the Republic of Crimea and federal city Simferopol under legal and economic integration (by the example of procurements of medications and medical equipment), Voprosy upravleniya, 2015, No. 2, pp. 172–180 (in Russ.).

26. Golovko A. G., Beketova E. V. Developing the mechanism of state procurements implementation in the Republic of Crimea in the aspect of joining the economic and legal sphere of the Russian Federation, Topical aspects of innovative economic and juridical development under the growing tension around Russia. April 25–26, 2015 (RISC), Rostov-on-Don, 2015, pp. 335–339 (in Russ.).

Citation :

Svishchuk T. V., Gafurova G. T. Estimating the efficiency of procurements of state customer The Republic of Crimea under its reunification with the Russian Federation, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2017, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 83–99 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.11.2017.2.83-99

Type of article : The scientific article

Date of receipt of the article :

Date of adoption of the print :

Date of online accommodation :