по-русски

Actual Problems of
Economics and Law

 

16+

 

DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.10.2016.4.150-165

скачать PDF

Authors :
1. Aleksandr S. Skaridov, Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of the Department of Private Law
Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping



Legal regime of the Bering Strait and security of navigation


Objective: to establish the legal regime and security of navigation in the Bering Strait.

Methods: formal logical method, systemic method, comparative legal method, statistical method.

Results: in the recent years, specialized publications contain numerous publications on the problems of development of Arctic shipping and the future intensification of the use of the Northern Sea Route. Whatever Arctic routes may be chosen by the skippers, the vessels will have to overcome the narrowness of the Bering Strait. If the existing estimates are reasonable, and the navigation of the North-West Sea Passage will increase, it is appropriate to ask whether the legal regime and security means are adapted to the possible increase of commercial shipping and military navigation. In this respect, the author formulates the legal measures aimed at ensuring security in the Bering Strait area with the account of growing cargo traffic.


Scientific novelty: for the first time the article proves the necessity to include into the Bering Strait area the territories, bounded from the north by the east and west passages formed by the Diomede Islands and continental coasts of the Russian Federation and the United States and from the south – by the passages between the Cape of Chukotka and Cape Sevuokuk of St. Lawrence Island, Cape Sivuka and the mainland of Alaska, in order to protect the sea natural landscape and to ensure the maritime safety. The opinion is substantiated about the necessity to equip the marine passages, forming the waters of the Bering Strait, with a security system. The proposed legal regime of ensuring the safety of navigation in the Bering Strait, which includes the common navigation rules, establishing the areas of the vessel traffic separation, designation of areas of marine reserves and organizational-legal means for damping the dangerous situations.

Practical significance: the findings and conclusions of the article can be used in scientific, educational and law enforcement practice in the consideration of the issue of the legal regime of the Bering Strait and the safety of navigation.


Keywords :

International law; The Bering Strait; Maritime law; Social and economic problems; Safety of navigation and navigation control


Bibliography :

1. Berkman, P., Vylegzhanin, A., Young, O. Governing the Bering Strait Region: Current Status, Emerging Issues and Future Options. Ocean Development & International Law, 2016, pр. 186–217, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2016.1159091 (access date: 10.06.2016).
2. Biggs, R., Schlüter, M., Biggs, D., Bohensky, E. L., Burn Silver, S., Cundill, G., Dakos, V., Daw, T. M., Evans, L. S., Kotschy, K., Leitch, A. M., Meek, C., Quinlan, A., Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Robards, M. D., Schoon, M. L., Schultz, L., West, P. C. Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2012, No. 37, pр. 421–448, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836 (access date: 10.06.2016).
3. Brigham, L. W. The fast-changing maritime Arctic: globalization, climate change, and geopolitics converge in this already challenging region,Proceedings of the U. S. Naval Institute, 2010, No. 136 (5), pр. 54–59.
4. Huntington, H. P., Daniel, R., Hartsig, A., Harun, K., Heiman, M., Meehan, R., Noongwook, G., Pearson, L., Prior-Parks, M., Robards, M., Stetson, G. Vessels, risks, and rules: planning for safe shipping in Bering Strait, Marine Policy, 2015, No. 51, pр. 119–127.
5. Laist, D. W., Knowlton, A. R., Pendleton, D. Effectiveness of mandatory vessel speed limits for protecting North Atlantic Right Whales // Endangered Species Research, 2014, No. 23, pр. 133–147, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/esr00586 (access date: 10.06.2016).
6. McKenna, M. F., Katz, S. L., Condit, C., Walbridge, S. Response of commercial ships to a voluntary speed reduction measure: are voluntary strategies adequate for mitigating ship-strike risk?, Coastal Management, 2012, No. 40 (6), pр. 634–650, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2012.727749 (access date: 10.06.2016).
7. McLeod, K., Leslie, H. Ecosystem-based management for the oceans, Island, Washington, D.C., USA, 2009.
8. Osterblom, H., Gardmark, A., Bergstrom, L., Muller-Karulis, B., Folke, C., Lindegren, M., Casini, M., Olsson, P., Diekmann, R., Blenckner, T., Humborg, C., Mollmann, C. Making the ecosystem approach operational: can regime shifts in ecological and governance systems facilitate the transition?, Marine Policy, 2010, No. 34 (6), pр. 1290–1299, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2010.05.007 (access date: 10.06.2016).
9. Paulin, J. A conflict between Alaska and the feds over Arctic policy?, Alaska Dispatch News, 8 September, 2013, Anchorage, Alaska.
10. Smith, L. C., Stephenson, S. R. New trans-Arctic shipping routes navigable by midcentury, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, No. 110, pр. 1191–1195, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214212110 (access date: 10.06.2016).
11. Greene, J. K. Freedom of Navigation: New Strategy for the Navy’s FON Program. Newport; Rhode Island: Naval War College, 1992, pр. 9–10.
12. Elferink, A. G. O., Rothwell, D. R. The law of the sea and the Polar maritime delimitation and jurisdiction, Kluwer Law International, 2001, pр. 81–83.
13. Brubaker, D. R. The Russian Arctic Straits. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005, pр. 192–193.
14. Roach, J. A., Smith, W. R. Excessive Maritime Claims, 3rd ed., Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012, p. 688.
15. Kraska, J., Pedrozo, R. International Maritime Security, Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013, p. 33.
16. Rufi, R., Khantington, G. Arctic Navigation – a way to the Russian-American cooperation, 20.11.2014, available at: http://russiancouncil.ru/inner/?id_4=4805#top-content (access date: 10.06.2016) (in Russ.).
17. Gudev, P. Conflicts of navigation regulation in the Bering Strait. 08.10.2015, available at: http://russiancouncil.ru/en/inner/?id_4=6668#topcontent (access date: 10.06.2016) (in Russ.).
18. Kolodkin, A. L. The great oceans. International-legal regime, Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1973 (in Russ.).
19. Molodtsov, S. V. Legal regime of marine waters, Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1982 (in Russ.).
20. Lazarev, M. I. Theoretical issues of the modern international maritime law, Moscow: Nauka, 1983 (in Russ.).
21. Pharand, D. Canada’s Arctic waters in international law, Cambridge university press, 1987 (in Russ.).
22. Ashley, Robert S. W. Excessive Maritime Claims, 3rd ed., Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012.
23. Kraska, J., Pedrozo, R. International Maritime Security, Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013.
24. Caron, D. D., Oral, N. Navigation straits. Challenges for International law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2014.


Citation :

Skaridov A. S. Legal regime of the Bering Strait and security of navigation, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2016, vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 150–165 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.10.2016.4.150-165


Type of article : The scientific article

Date of receipt of the article :
15.07.2016

Date of adoption of the print :
02.11.2016

Date of online accommodation :
29.12.2016