скачать PDF
Authors : 1. Sergey K. Iliy,
PhD (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Prosecutor’s Monitoring and Law Strengthening in the sphere of state and municipal service and corruption counteraction
Scientific-Research Institute of the Academy of Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation
Activity of the prosecutor’s office bodies of the Russian Federation for administrative prosecution of physical and juridical persons for corruption law breaches
Objective: to analyze the problems of identifying and impleading the persons guilty of corruptive administrative offenses and the role of the Prosecutor’s Office in this activity.
Methods: formal logical method, systemic method, comparative legal, statistical.
Results: the author proposes to include a special chapter in the Russian Administrative Code on corruptive administrative offences, and to provide for the possibility of exemption from administrative liability of legal persons, who actively contributed to the disclosure and (or) investigation of crime, or when there has been extortion of bribes from officials, or if a legal person after the crime voluntary informed on bribery to the body entitled to institute criminal proceedings. In the process of research, the author proposed a new wording of Article 19.28 of the Russian Administrative Code, providing for liability of not only legal entities but also individuals, engaged in entrepreneurial activities without forming a legal entity.
Scientific novelty: the existing problems of impleading for committing corruptive administrative offences are identified and classified, the ways of their solution are proposed.
Practical significance: the research results can be used in the practical work of prosecutors, as well as in the development of proposals on improvement of the Russian Code of Administrative Offences.
Keywords :
Dialectics of corruption counteraction; Corruption; Administrative offence related to corruption; Corruption offence; Illegal remuneration; Article 19.28 of the Administrative Code; Article 19.29 of the Administrative Code; Corruption counteraction
Bibliography :
1. Kostennikov, M. V., Kurakin, A. V., Myshlyaev, N. P. Classification of administrative-preventive measures, NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya, 2015, No. 2, pp. 72–88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2015.2.15847, available at: http://e-notabene.ru/al/article_15847.html (access date: 25.08.2016) (in Russ.).
2. Golovanova, N. A., Seleznev, V. A. Administrative liability of juridical persons for corruption breaches, Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya, 2016, No. 3, pp. 44–50 (in Russ.).
3. Vinokurov, A. Yu. Administrative prosecution as a function of the Prosecutor’s Office in the Russian Federation, Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2012, No. 10, pp. 52–56 (in Russ.).
4. Vinokurov, A. Yu. Prosecutor’s participation in administrative prosecution of the officials executing certain state functions, Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2013, No. 1, pp. 30–35 (in Russ.).
5. Subanova, N. V. Issues of providing lawfulness in the sphere of administrative enforcement by means of prosecutor’s observance, Vestnik Akademii General'noi prokuratury Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2014, No. 3 (41), pp. 45–51 (in Russ.).
6. Ilii, S. K. Administrative breaches in corruption sphere, Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2015, No. 5 (89), pp. 460–468 (in Russ.).
7. Melekhin, A. V. Prosecutor’s authorities in procedures on administrative breaches in the Russian Federation, Moscow: Akad. Gen. prokuratury RF, 2014, 120 p. (in Russ.).
8. Sakkulina, L. L., Ershov, Ya. N. Legal aspects of juridical persons’ administrative liability for corruption breaches, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2015, No. 6, pp. 144–147 (in Russ.).
9. Zyryanov, S. M., Tsirin, A. M. Administrative liability for illegal remuneration on behalf of a juridical person, Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 2015, No. 2, pp. 82–90 (in Russ.).
10. Dolgikh, I. P. To be or not to be for the institution of administrative liability exemption in the Russian Federation? Yuridicheskie issledovaniya, 2015, No. 1, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2015.1.13775, available at: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_13775.html (access date: 25.08.2016) (in Russ.).
11. Feoktistov, S. V., Sherstov, A. V. Role of prosecutor’s office in providing the unavoidability of juridical persons’ punishment for corruption breaches, Zakonnost', 2015, No. 8, pp. 14–18 (in Russ.).
12. Shirokikh, A. V. Observance over execution of law on municipal service and corruption counteraction in an oblast center, Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie, 2012, No. 10, pp. 35–39 (in Russ.).
13. Besschasnyi, S. A., Budlov, I. M. Prosecutor’s protest against court decrees on removal of actions on administrative breaches in the sphere of corruption counteraction due to their insignificance, Zakonnost', 2014, No. 5, pp. 7–10 (in Russ.).
14. Channov, S. E. Can a corruption breach be insignificant?, Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava, 2014, No. 10, pp. 2197–2203 (in Russ.).
15. Besschasnyi, S. A., Skorik, V. N. Administrative liability of juridical persons on behalf of which or in the interests of which the corruption breaches are committed, Zakonnost', 2015, No. 6, pp. 50–52 (in Russ.).
16. Pen'kov, D. N. Problems of collecting fines imposed by laws according to Art. 19.28 of the Russian Administrative Code, Zakonnost', 2015, No. 4, pp. 15–18 (in Russ.).
17. Cherepanova, I. V., Kiek, T. Z. Implementation of prosecutor’s authority on initiation of proceedings on corruptive administrative breaches, Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal, 2016, No. 3 (94), pp. 140–141 (in Russ.).
18. Dolgikh, I. P. Imperfection of legislation on administrative breaches, Zakonnost', 2014, No. 7, pp. 58–61 (in Russ.).
19. Polyakov, M. M. Corruptive administrative breaches: notion, types and content, Vestnik universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina (MGYuA), 2015, No. 8, pp. 209–215 (in Russ.).
20. Rostovtseva, Yu. V. Administrative liability for corruption crimes in the state service system, Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2012, No. 3, pp. 47–52 (in Russ.).
Citation :
Iliy S. K. Activity of the prosecutor’s office bodies of the Russian Federation for administrative prosecution of physical and juridical persons for corruption law breaches, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2016, vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 27–44 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.10.2016.4.27-44
Type of article : The scientific article
Date of receipt of the article :
02.09.2016
Date of adoption of the print :
20.10.2016
Date of online accommodation :
29.12.2016
