in English

АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ
ЭКОНОМИКИ И ПРАВА

 

16+

 

DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.03.2009.1.48-60

скачать PDF

Авторы :
1. Т. В. Крамин, Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor
Institute of Economics, Management & Law, Kazan, Russia

3. S. D. Young, Senior Vice President and Managing Director
Evergreen Investments, Option Strategies Group, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA



Share returns distribution: empirical observations and implications for options pricing



Underlying asset returns regularly depart from normal. In a Black-Scholes economy, asset prices are assumed lognormal and subsequently returns are normal. The literature regarding asset return behavior is extensive. In addition, the number of options pricing models, which take into account non-normality, discontinuities, and stochastic variables, are also extensive. These models are an effort at reconciling real world option prices with the assumptions in the Black-Scholes paradigm. This article contains a review of the literature regarding asset returns; alternative option pricing parameterizations, and recovering the implied risk-neutral distribution from listed options. Following this, theory takes precedence as a simple plain-vanilla option-pricing model, which incorporates the first-four moments of the risk-neutral density is explored. In the results section, S&P 500 Index market daily log returns are explored and univariate properties lead to a rejection of the null hypothesis of normality. Then, using the simple four-moment model and skewness and kurtosis values consistent with those recovered from listed options by numerous researchers we imply the risk neutral densities associated with actual option prices on the S&P 500 Index. The implications are profound. It is very clear that the implied risk neutral densities are significantly different from the normal distribution which forms the basis for the Black-Scholes model.


Ключевые слова :

Equity returns, non-normality, options pricing, Edgeworth expansion


Cписок литературы :

1. Abken, P. and S. Nandi. 1996. «Options and Volatility». Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta – Economic Review, (December): 21-35.
2. Aggarwal, R. 1990. «Distribution of Spot and Forward Exchange Rates: Empirical Evidence and Investor Valuation of Skewness and Kurtosis». Decision Sciences, vol. 21. issue 3: 588-595.
3. Aggarwal, R. and P. Rao Ramesh. 1990. «Institutional Ownership and Distribution of Equity Returns». The Financial Review, 25: 211-29.
4. Aggarwal, R. and P. Rao and T. Hiraki. 1989. «Skewness and Kurtosis in Japanese Equity Returns: Empirical Evidence». The Financial Review, 12, no. 3 (Fall): 211-29.
5. Arrow, K.J. 1964 «The Role of Securities in the Optimal Allocation of Risk-Bearing». Review of Economic Studies, 31, no. 2 (April): 91-96.
6. Balakrishnan, N., Johnson, N., and Samuel Kotz. Continuous Univariate Distributions. Vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994.
7. Bhupinder, B. 1997 «Implied risk-neutral probability density functions from option prices: theory and application». Bank of England.
8. Black, Fischer and Myron Scholes. 1973. «The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities». Journal of Political Economy, vol. 81, no. 3 (May/June): 637-54.
9. Breeden, D.T. and R.H. Litzenberger. 1978. «Prices of State-Contingent Claims Implicit in Option Prices». Journal of Business, vol. 51, no. 4: 621-51.
10. Campbell J.Y. and L. Hentschel. 1992. «No News Is Good News: An Asymmetric Model Of Changing Volatility In Stock Returns». Journal of Financial Economics, 31: 281-318.
11. Corrado, C.J. 2001. «Option Pricing Based on the Generalized Lambda Distribution». Journal of Futures Markets, (February).
12. Corrado, C.J. and T. Su. 1996. «Skewness and Kurtosis in S&P 500 Index Returns Implied by Option Prices». Journal of Financial Research, 19: 175-192.
13. Cox, J. and S. Ross. 1976. «The Valuation of Options for Alternative Stochastic Processes». Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 145-66.
14. Das, S.R. and R.K. Sundaram. 1999. «Of Smiles and Smirks: A Term Structure Perspective». Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 34(2): 211-239.
15. Debreu, G. 1959. The Theory of Value, Wiley, NY.
16. Derman, E. and I. Kani. 1994. «Riding on the Smile». Risk, 7 (February): 32-39.
17. Dupire, B. 1994. «Pricing with a Smile». Risk, 7 (January): 18-20.
18. Fama, Eugene F. 1965. «The Behavior of Stock Market Prices». Journal of Business, 38: 34-105.
19. Heston, S. 1993. «A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options». Review of Financial Studies, 6: 327-43.
20. Hull, J. and A. White. 1987. «The Pricing of Options on Assets with Stochastic Volatilities». The Journal of Finance, vol. 42, no. 2 (June): 281-300.
21. Jackwerth, J.C. and M. Rubinstein. 1995. «Recovering Probability Distributions from Contemporaneous Security Prices». The Journal of Finance, December.
22. Jackwerth, J.C. and M. Rubinstein. 1996. «Recovering Probability Distributions from Option Prices». The Journal of Finance, December.
23. Jarrow, R. and A. Rudd. 1982. «Approximate Option Valuation for Arbitrary Stochastic Processes». Journal of Financial Economics, 10, no. 3 (November): 347-69.
24. Johnson, R.S., Pawlukiewicz, J.E., and J.M. Mehta. 1997. «Binomial Option Pricing with Skewed Asset Returns». Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 9: 89-101.
25. Longstaff, F.A. 1995. «Option Pricing and the Martingale Restriction». The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 8, Issue 4 (Winter): 1091-1124.
26. Macbeth, J. and L. Merville. 1979. «An Empirical"


Цитирование :

1


Тип статьи : Научная статья

Дата поступления статьи :
22.12.2008

Дата принятия в печать :
19.01.2009

Дата онлайн размещения :
27.06.2016