скачать PDF
Authors : 1. Valentina Aleksandrovna Lazareva,
Doctor of Law, Professor
Samara State University
2. Marina Yuryevna Zhirova,
PhD (Law), Senior Lecturer
Samara State University
Theoretical issues of proving in the aspect of specific procedure in private prosecution cases
The article views the existing in criminal and civil procedure concepts of proving from the point of view of the clearest proving in private prosecution cases. It is revealed that the right to gather evidence in such cases belongs to all participants of cases which have the status of a party, while the evidence gathered by them cannot be lodged with the same requirements as the evidence gathered by official participants in public prosecution cases.
Keywords :
private court action; criminal court action; civil procedure; forming out of evidence; antagonistic symbol of court procedure
Bibliography :
1. Belkin A.R. Teoriya dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (Theory of proving in criminal court action). Moscow, 2005, p. 28.
2. Dolya E.A. Ispol'zovanie v dokazyvanii rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoi deyatel'nosti (Using the results of operative-research activity for proving). Moscow, 1996, p. 9.
3. Strogovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa (A course of Soviet criminal procedure). Moscow: Nauka, 1968, p. 302.
4. Sheifer S.A. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya (Evidence and proving in criminal cases: problems of theory and legal regulation). Moscow: Norma, 2008, p. 96.
5. Arsen'ev V.D. Voprosy obshchei teorii sudebnykh dokazatel'stv (Issues of general theory of court evidence). Moscow, 1964, p. 15.
6. Zhirova M.Yu. Iskovaya priroda chastnogo obvineniya (Act ional nature of private prosecution), Vestnik SamGU, 2011, No. 4 (85), pp. 289–295.
7. Shaposhnikov V.L. Problemy sobiraniya dokazatel'stv storonoi obvineniya v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii (Issues of gathering evidence by prosecution party in the Russian criminal procedure). Volgograd, 2005, p. 128.
8. Mikhailovskaya I.B. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo v mirovom sude (Criminal court action in justice’s court). Moscow: TK VELBI, Prospekt, 2003, pp. 43–45.
9. Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (britanskii Akt o politsii i dokazatel'stvakh po ugolovnym delam) (British Act on Police and Criminal Evidence), available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/60/contents (data obrashcheniya 02.10.2012).
10. Federal Rules of Evidence (Federal'nye pravila o dokazatel'stvakh SShA) (The USA Federal Rules of Evidence), available at: http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/ (data obrashcheniya 02.10.2012).
11. Evidence Act 1995 (avstraliiskii Akt o dokazatel'stvakh) (Australia Evidence Act), available at: http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2011C00929/Html/Text#_Toc310590593 (data obrashcheniya 02.10.2012).
12. Smirnov A.V. Modeli ugolovnogo protsessa (Models of criminal procedure). Saint Petersburg., 2000, pp. 50–51.
13. Kalinovskii K.B. Zakonnost' i tipy ugolovnogo protsessa (Lawfulness and types of criminal procedure). Saint Petersburg, 1999, pp. 84–85.
14. Makarkin A.I. Sostyazatel'nost' na predvaritel'nom sledstvii (Competition at preliminary investigation). Saint Petersburg, 2004, pp. 34–35.
Citation :
