скачать PDF
Authors : 1. Artem O. Gryaznov,
Post-graduate student
Nizhniy Novgorod State University named after N.I. Lobachevskiy, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia
Relationship between the criminal proceduer setting and the objectives of public prosecution
Objective: on the basis of the doctrine, legislation and practice, to make conclusions about the degree of efficiency of such participants in the criminal proceedings, as the detective, investigator, Prosecutor, judge, and to analyze the observance and implementation of such important principles as adversary, equality of the parties and presumption of innocence from the point of view of the thorough study of their practical application.
Methods: dialectical method, analysis, synthesis, deduction and induction, and specific scientific methods of scientific cognition.
Results: the actual position was determined of the subjects of criminal proceedings from the point of view of feasibility of basic principles of criminal proceedings, not in legislative but in practical aspect.
Scientific novelty: Often the position of criminal proceeding subjects, their authority, role, and status are analyzed from the point of view of legislative norms. It also true for criminal proceedings. In the article an attempt is made to analyze with the new position the relationship of the criminal process setting and the objectives of public prosecution in the modern period of development of criminal procedural science.
Practical value: the criminal proceedings is an essential element in the aspect of the citizens’ rights protection, thus it is obvious that the position of the criminal proceedings participants should objective and transparent, and the criminal proceedings principles should be implemented. The article shows the problems and proposes was of their solution, which are of objective interest. The research results can be applied in practice and taken into account when making changes in the legislation.
Keywords :
public prosecution; criminal procedure; investigator; Prosecutor; judge; adversarial principle; pre-trial proceedings
Bibliography :
1. Frolov, I.T. Sovremennaya filosofiya: slovar' i khrestomatiya (Modern philosophy: dictionary and anthology). Rostov-na-Dony, 1995, 511 p.
2. Smirnov, A.F. Prokuratura i problemy upravleniya (Prosecutor’s office and management issues). Moscow: Kriminologicheskaya assotsiatsiya, 1997, 264 p.
3. Merton, R. Sotsial'naya teoriya i sotsial'naya struktura (Social theory and social structure). Moscow, 2006, 873 p.
4. Polyanskii, N.N. Voprosy teorii sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa (Issues of the theory of the Soviet criminal procedure). Moscow, 1956, 271 p.
5. Polyanskii, N.N. Ocherki obshchei teorii ugolovnogo protsessa (Sketches of the general theory of criminal procedure). Moscow: Pravo i zhizn', 1927, 125 p.
6. Polyanskii, N.N. Ugolovnyi protsess. Ugolovnyi sud, ego ustroistvo i deyatel'nost' (Criminal procedure. Criminal court, its structure and activity). Moscow: Tovarishchestvo I. D. Sytina, 1911, 203 p.
7. Tomin, V.T. Ponyatie tseli sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa (Notion of the objective of the Soviet criminal procedure). Pravovedenie, 1969, pp. 66–67.
8. Tomin ,V.T. Ostrye ugly doktrinal'nogo obespecheniya radikal'noi reformy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Tsel' i sredstva v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (Sharp ends of the doctrinal provision of the radical reform of criminal procedure. Objective and means of the criminal procedure). Nizhnii Novgorod, 1991, 240 p.
9. Tomin, V.T. Ponyatie tseli sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa (Notion of the objective of the Soviet criminal procedure). Tomin V.T. Izbrannye trudy. Predislovie S.P. Grishina. Saint-Petersburg, 2004, 586 p.
10. Smirnov, A.F. Proverka organizatsii raboty nizhestoyashchikh prokuratur s okazaniem prakticheskoi pomoshchi (Checking the organization of work of subordinate Prosecutor's offices with practical assistance): ucheb. posobie. Moscow, 1989, 152 p.
11. Volkova, V.N., Denisov, A.A. Osnovy teorii sistem i sistemnogo analiza (Baes of systems theory and systemic analysis). Saint-Petersburg, 1997, 510 p.
12. Agutin, A.V. Osnovy ugolovno-protsessual'nogo dokazyvaniya v rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (Bases of criminal-procedural proving in the Russian criminal procedure): monografiya. Pod red. V.N. Grigor'eva. Moscow: MAEP, 2010, 184 p.
13. Kornukov, V.M. Naznachenie ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i ego otrazhenie v reglamentatsii otdel'nykh stadii i institutov (Purpose of the criminal procedure and its reflection in the regulation o f certain stages and institutions). Kontseptual'nye osnovy reformy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossii: materialy nauchnoi konferentsii. Moscow, 2002, 59 p.
14. Rozin, N.N. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo (Criminal procedure). Petrograd, 1916, 603 p.
15. Fel'dshtein, G.S. Lektsii po ugolovnomu sudoproizvodstvu (Lectures on criminal procedure). Moscow, 1915. 60 p.
16. Kachalova, O.V. Ponyatie i zadachi ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (Notion and tasks of the criminal procedure). Ugolovnyi protsess: uchebnik dlya studentov yuridicheskikh vuzov i fakul'tetov. Moscow, 2003. 388 p.
17. Barshev, Ya.I. Osnovaniya ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva, s primeneniem k rossiiskomu ugolovnomu sudoproizvodstvu (Bases of criminal procedure applied to the Russian criminal procedure). Saint-Petersburg, 1841, 385 p.
18. Bezlepkin, B.T. Ugolovnyi protsess Rossii v voprosakh i otvetakh (Criminal procedure of Russia in questions and answers): ucheb. posobie. Moscow, 2000, 336 p.
19. Bozh'ev, V.P. Sushchnost' i zadachi ugolovnogo protsessa (Essence and tasks of criminal procedure). Ugolovnyi protsess. Pod red.
V. P. Bozh'eva. Moscow, 1998, 692 p.
20. Gromov, N.A. Ugolovnyi protsess Rossii (Criminal procedure in Russia): ucheb. posobie. Moscow, 1998, 552 p.
21. Chel'tsov, M.A. Sovetskii ugolovnyi protsess (Soviet criminal procedure). Moscow, 1962, 503 p.
22. Grishin, S.P. Okhrana chesti i dostoinstva lichnosti pri proizvodstve po ugolovnomu delu (protection of honor and dignity of a personality during the criminal procedure). Ugolovno-protsessual'naya deyatel'nost' i pravootnosheniya v stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. 1981, p. 47.
23. Nazhimov, V.P. Diskussionnye voprosy ucheniya o printsipakh sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa (Disputable issues of the doctrine of the principles of the Soviet criminal procedure). Voprosy organizatsii suda i osushchestvleniya pravosudiya v SSSR, 1975, no. 4, p. 11.
24. Stetsovskii, Yu.I. Esli chelovek obvinen v prestuplenii (If a person is accused of a crime). Moscow, 1988, 208 p.
25. Strogovich, M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa (A course in the Soviet criminal procedure). Moscow, 1968, vol. 1, 468 p.
26. Solov'ev, V.V. Nedokazannost' uchastiya obvinyaemogo v sovershenii prestupleniya kak osnovanie prekrashcheniya ugolovnogo dela v stadii rassledovaniya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk (The unproved participation of the accused in the crime as the basis for the criminal case termination at the stage of investigation: abstract of a PhD (Law) thesis). Moscow, 1990. 170 p.
27. Dukhovskoi, M.V. Iz lektsii po ugolovnomu protsessu (From the lecture on criminal procedure). Moscow, 1895, 217 p.
28. Murav'ev, N.V. Obshchie osnovaniya ustroistva i ugolovnoi deyatel'nosti prokurorskogo nadzora (1891–1892 gg.) (General foundations for structure and criminal activity of Prosecutor’s supervision (1891–1892)). Saint-Petersburg, 1900, vol. 1, 572 p.
29. Zazhitskii, V.I. Nuzhny li ugolovnomu protsessu zadachi? (Does the criminal procedure need tasks?). Rossiiskaya yustitsiya, 2011, no. 4, pp. 22–26.
30. Kobzarev, F. Prokurory i sud'i o vzaimodeistvii v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (Prosecutors and judges on the interaction in the sphere of criminal procedure). Zakonnost', 2006, no. 8, pp. 37–40.
Citation :
