по-русски

Actual Problems of
Economics and Law

 

16+

 

DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.06.2012.4.108-111

скачать PDF

Authors :
1. Albert Anvarovich Khaidarov, PhD (Law)
Kazan Juridical Institute of the Russian Ministry of Home Affairs



Conditions of judges’ corrupt behavior at original jurisdiction of criminal cases


The article deals with judges’ arbitrary rule and subjectivism, which occur at the stage of court investigation in the Russian criminal court procedure. The issues of the judges’ responsibility for arbitrary rule are discussed; the conditions of the judges’ corrupt behavior are investigated at original jurisdiction.
 


Keywords :

 judges’ arbitrary rule; judges’ subjectivism; corruption


Bibliography :

1. Berg L.N. Sudebnoe usmotrenie i ego predely (obshcheteoreticheskii aspekt) (Judicial discretion and its limits (general theoretical aspect)). Ekaterinburg, 2008, p. 111.
2. Lyublinskii P.I. Osnovaniya sudeiskogo usmotreniya v ugolovnykh delakh: doklad dlya Kievskogo s"ezda Russkoi gruppy Mezhdunarodnogo soyuza kriminalistov (Bases for judicial discretion in criminal cases: report for the Kiev Assembly of the Russian group of the International Union of Criminologists), Zhurnal Ministerstva yustitsii, 1904, p. 3.
3. Shapsugov D.Yu. Problemy teorii i istorii vlasti, prava i gosudarstva (Issues of theory and history of power, law and state). Moscow: Yurist, 2003, p. 485.
4. Gracheva Yu.V. Sudeiskoe usmotrenie v ugolovnom prave (Judicial discretion in criminal law). Moscow, 2002, p. 28.
5. Abushenko D.B. Sudebnoe usmotrenie v grazhdanskom protsesse (Judicial discretion in civil procedure). Moscow, 2002, pp. 139–155.
6. Khaidarov A.A. Osobennosti sudebnogo sledstviya v sude s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedatelei (Features of judicial investigation in jury trial), Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava, 2012, No. 2 (22), pp. 237–243.
7. Tarasov A.A. Edinolichnoe i kollegial'noe v ugolovnom protsesse: pravovye i sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie problem (Sole and collegiate in criminal procedure: legal and social-psychological issues). Samara: Izd-vo Samarskogo un-ta, 2001, pp. 5, 18, 252, 255, 262.
8. Bagautdinov F.N. Proizvodstvo v sude prisyazhnykh (Procedure in jury trial). Kazan: Izd-vo “Poznanie” IUEP, 2006, p. 28.
 


Citation :