по-русски

Actual Problems of
Economics and Law

 

16+

 

DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.06.2012.4.35-41

скачать PDF

Authors :
1. Sergey Vladimirovich Izosimov, Doctor of Law, Professor
Nizhniy Novgorod Institute for Management and Business



Subjective element of bribe giving and taking: criminal-legal analysis


The article views the main elements of subjective aspects of bribe giving and taking. Basing on materials law enforcement practice, the aims and motives of bribe giving and taking are described, as well as forms of guilt.
 


Keywords :

bribe; bribe giving; bribe taking; motive; aim; authority bodies; an official


Bibliography :

1. Rarog A.I. Sub"ektivnaya storona i kvalifikatsiya prestuplenii (Subjective element and qualification of crimes). Moscow, 2001, p. 6.
2. Rarog A.I. Kvalifikatsiya prestuplenii po sub"ektivnym priznakam (Qualification of crimes by subjective element). Saint Petersburg, 2003, p. 52.
3. Entsiklopediya ugolovnogo prava. T. 4: Sostav prestupleniya. (Encyclopedia of Criminal Law. Vol.4. Corpus delicti). Saint Petersburg: Izdanie professora V.B. Malinina, 2005, p. 641.
4. Egorov V.S. Ponyatie sostava prestupleniya v ugolovnom prave (Notion of corpus delicti in criminal law). Moscow: Moskovskii psikhologo-sotsial'nyi institut; Voronezh: Izd-vo NPO “MODEK”, 2001, p. 40.
5. Markaryan S.A. Znachenie sub"ektivnoi storony prestupleniya v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve RF (Significance of subjective element of a crime in the Russian criminal legislation), Biznes v zakone, 2007, No. 4, p. 271.
6. Sitkovskaya O.D. Psikhologicheskii kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Psychological comment to the Russian Criminal Code). Moscow: “Zertsalo”, 1999, p. 3.
7. Tolkachenko A.A. Problemy sub"ektivnoi storony prestupleniya (Issues of the subjective element of crimes). Moscow: YuNITI-DANA, 2005, p. 11.
8. Izosimov S.V., Geivandov E.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika polucheniya i dachi vzyatki (Criminal-legal characteristics of bribe giving and taking) Nizhnii Novgorod, NIU RANKhiGS, 2012, p. 76.
9. Kachmazov O.Kh. Otvetstvennost' za vzyatochnichestvo po rossiiskomu ugolovnomu pravu (Liability for bribery by the Russian criminal law) Vladikavkaz, 2000, p. 107.
10. Kommentarii k UK RF (Comment to the Russian Criminal Code). Moscow: TK Velbi; Prospekt, 2004. p. 156.
11. Groshev A.V. Otvetstvennost' za vzyatochnichestvo (voprosy teorii i praktiki) (Liability for bribery (issues of theory and practice)). Krasnodar: KubGAU, 2008, p. 125.
12. Korzhanskii N.I. Kvalifikatsiya sledovatelem dolzhnostnykh prestuplenii (Qualification of official malfeasance by an investigator). Volgograd, 1986, pp. 42–43.
13. Kommentarii k UK RF (Comment to the Russian Criminal Code). Rostov on Don, 1996, p. 583.
14. Rossiiskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast' (Russian Criminal Code. Special Par). Moscow, 1998, p. 376.
15. Meshcherskii A.S. Ugolovno-pravovye aspekty polucheniya vzyatki kak naibolee opasnogo proyavleniya korruptsii (Criminal-legal aspects of bribe taking as the most dangerous of corruption manifestation). Saint Petersburg, 2002, pp. 179–180.
16. Zdravomyslov B.V. Dolzhnostnye prestupleniya. Ponyatie i kvalifikatsiya. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1975, p. 139.
17. Volzhenkin B.V. Sluzhebnye prestupleniya. Moscow, 2000, p. 220.
18. Veibert S.I. Vzyatochnichestvo: Problemy kvalifikatsii i naznacheniya nakazaniya (Bribery: issues of qualification and sentencing). Chelyabinsk, 2007, pp. 83–84.
19. Alimpiev S.A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za poluchenie vzyatki po rossiiskomu zakonodatel'stvu (Criminal liability for bribery by the Russian criminal law). Ekaterinburg, 2008, p. 18.
20. Dagel' P.S., Mikheev R.I. Ustanovlenie sub"ektivnoi storony prestupleniya. Vladivostok, 1972, pp. 12–13.
21. Malinovskii I.B. Ugolovno-pravovaya bor'ba s korystnymi dolzhnostnymi prestupleniyami v sovremennykh usloviyakh (Criminal-legal struggle with lucrative official malfeasance in modern conditions). Moscow, 1993, p. 167.
22. Suchkov R.N. Poluchenie vzyatki: ugolovno-pravovoe i kriminologicheskoe issledovanie (Bribe taking: criminal-legal and criminological research). Kazan, 2007, p. 22.
23. Svetlov A.Ya. Teoreticheskie problemy ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za dolzhnostnye prestupleniya (Тheoretical issues of criminal liability for official malfeasance). Kiev, 1980, p. 15.
24. Guev A.N. Kommentarii k UK RF (dlya predprinimatelei) (Comment to the Russian Criminal Code). Moscow, 2000, p. 228.
25. Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Comment to the Russian Criminal Code). Moscow: Yurait, 2012, p. 841.
 


Citation :