по-русски

Actual Problems of
Economics and Law

 

16+

 

DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.08.2014.1.32-38

скачать PDF

Authors :
1. A. A. Ivanov, Doctor of Law, Associate Professor
Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia



Requirements of the principle of punishment execution individualization as an important factor of counteraction to corruption and subjectivity of parole institution


Objective: to prove the importance of the consistent implementation of the requirements of the principle of punishment individualization in the practice of penitentiary system of the Russian Federation.

Methods: The methodology of research is based on dialectic which allows to consider state-legal phenomena in its development and dynamics, in close interaction with other factors of social life.

Results: the main conclusion of this article is the proposition that the consistent fulfillment of the requirements of the punishment individualization principle can bar the manifestation of potential elements of subjectivity and corruption in the activities of the penitentiary institutions officials in the implementation of the legislative framework regulating the parole process.

Scientific novelty: Justification of the statement that only the consistent fulfillment of the requirements of the punishment individualization principle can currently bar the manifestation of potential elements of subjectivity and corruption in the activities of the penitentiary institutions officials in the implementation of the legislative framework regulating the parole process.

Practical value: conclusions and findings formulated in the work may be useful in legislative, law-enforcement and educational spheres of legal activity


Keywords :

punishment execution; individualization of punishment execution; parole; penitentiary practice of foreign countries; behanior off the convicted; reformation of the convicted; psychological factors; timeserving and conformity of the convicted; corruption; subjectivity of the officials; court practice


Bibliography :

http://www.pbc-clcc.gc.ca/parle/parle-eng.shtml
2. http://www.riza.tripod.com/id1.html
3. http://jurisonline.in/?p=458
4. http://www.fsin.su/news/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=11802
5. http://top.rbc.ru/society/28/02/2011/551425.shtml
6. Kashuba, Yu. A., Skiba, A. P. Institut uslovno-dosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya: novyi vzglyad (Parole institution: a new view). Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie, 2010, no. 1(72), pp. 14–17.
7. Inogamova, L. V. Uslovno-dosrochnoe osvobozhdenie ot nakazaniya (Parole). Tyumen, 1992. 73 p.
8. Yanchuk, I.A. Kriterii otsenki stepeni ispravleniya osuzhdennykh: kakimi im byt'? (Criteria for evaluating the degree of the convicted reformation: what should they be?) Vestnik Vologodskogo instituta prava i ekonomiki FSIN Rossii, 2008, no. 4, pp. 5–58.
9. Mikhlina, A. S. i Seliverstova, V. I. Kommentarii k st. 172. “Osnovaniya osvobozhdeniya ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya” (Comment to Art.172. “Grounds for release from punishment”). Ugolovno-ispolnitel'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii: postateinyi nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii. Moscow, 2004. 233 p.
10. Zvereva, O.N. Realizatsiya printsipa individualizatsii nakazaniya pri ispolnenii lisheniya svobody: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk (Implementation of the punishment individualization principle during custody: abstract of a PhD (Law) thesis). Ryazan, 2005. 233 p.
11. Sevryugin, A.S. Kriterii i pokazateli ispravleniya i perevospitaniya osuzhdennykh (Criteria and indicators of reforming of convicts). Ryazan, 1989. 81 p.
12. Antonyan, Yu. M., Eminov, V. E., Enikeev, M. I. Psikhologiya prestupleniya i nakazaniya (Psychology of crime and punishment). Moscow, 2001. 454 p.
13. Uss, A. Dopustimo li ispravlyat' osuzhdennykh (Is it acceptable to reform the convicts?). Prestuplenie i nakazanie, 1994, no. 1(2), pp. 29–33.


Citation :

Ivanov A. A. Requirements of the principle of punishment execution individualization as an important factor of counteraction to corruption and subjectivity of parole institution, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2014, vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 32–38.


Type of article : The scientific article

Date of receipt of the article :
13.01.2014

Date of adoption of the print :
28.02.2014

Date of online accommodation :
25.06.2016