по-русски

Actual Problems of
Economics and Law

 

16+

 

DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.09.2015.3.230-237

скачать PDF

Authors :
1. Bulat Raisovich Burganov, post-graduate student
Kazan (Volga) Federal University, Kazan, Russia



Systemic-institutional approach to solving the problems of prejudgement in the criminal court procedure


Objective: to consider the historical and legal aspects of the use of prejudgement in the criminal procedure and to allocate its characteristic features as of a systemic object; to disclose the key system elements of the mechanism of legal regulation of prejudgement in the criminal procedure.


Methods: the basis of the research was historical-legal method and systemic-institutional approach to the analysis of regulatory processes, as well as special and private law research methods, elements of structural-functional approach with formal logical analysis.

Results: the evolution is shown of formation and development of the prejudgement institution; the necessity is grounded of systemic-holistic analysis of prejudgement legal regulation in the criminal procedure. According to the author, it is a systematic approach that will allow to create the effectively functioning prejudgement institution. The article investigates the content side of the prejudgement institution in the criminal-procedural law.


Scientific novelty: for the first time, the article discusses the prejudgement institution as a system of interrelated elements. In this context, the substantial side of this system is characterized.


Practical significance: the research results and conclusions can be used in research, legislative and applied activity for the effective application of the principles of prejudgement opportunities in the criminal procedure.
 


Keywords :

 Prejudgement institution; Criminal law; Parties to the proceedings; Systemic-institutional approach; Criminal proceedings
 


Bibliography :

1. Dikarev, I.S. Preyuditsial'nost' sudebnykh reshenii v ugolovnom protsesse (Prejudgement character of court decisions in the criminal procedure). Zakonnost', 2014, no. 10, pp. 75–86.
2. Il'in, A.V. K voprosu o soderzhanii preyuditsial'nosti – svoistva zakonnoi sily sudebnogo resheniya (On the issue of the content of prejudgement – features of the legal power of the court decision). Zakon, 2015, no. 3, pp. 51–53.
3. Epikhin, A.Yu. Otzyv ofitsial'nogo opponenta na dissertatsiyu Yu.E. Saleevoi «Preyuditsiya v sovremennom ugolovnom protsesse Rossii» (Nizhnii Novgorod, 2014. 192 s.) (Review of the official opponent to the dissertation by Yu. E. Saleyeva “Prejudgement in the modern criminal procedure in Russia” (Nizhniy Novgorod, 2014. 192 p.)). Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2014, no. 3 (27), p. 329.
4. Epikhin, A.Yu. Preyuditsial'noe znachenie sudebnykh reshenii na protsess dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom protsesse. Studenchestvo i nauka XXI v. (7–11 aprelya 2014 g., Kazan') (Prejudgement significance of court decision for the proof process in the criminal procedure) / pod red. R.R. Fakhrutdinova, S.L. Alekseeva. Kazan: ChOU VPO «Akademiya sotsial'nogo obrazovaniya», 2014, pp. 109–113.
5. Muratova, N.G. Preyuditsiya: vzaimosvyaz' protsessual'nykh protsedur (Prejudgement: interaction of procedures). Vestnik Permskogo universiteta, 2010, no. 3 (9), pp. 194.
6. Shcheglovitov, I. Grazhdanskaya predsudimost' po ugolovnym delam (Civil prejudgement in criminal cases). Zhurnal grazhdanskogo i ugolovnogo prava, 1892, kn. 5, pp. 130–146.
7. Malykh, E.G. Problemy preyuditsii v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk (Issues of prejudgement in civil and arbitrary proceduers: PhD (Law) thesis). Moscow, 2005, 27 p.
8. Malkov, V.P. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya: za i protiv (Administrative prejudgement: for and against). Vestnik Akademii General'noi prokuratury Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2011, no. 3, pp. 58–65.
9. Lebedev, V. Sudebnaya zashchita rassmatrivaetsya grazhdanami kak prioritetnaya (Court protection is viewed by the citizens as the priority one). Kommersant", 2012, 17 dekabrya.
10. Alekseev, P.V., Panin,  A.V. Filosofiya: uchebnik (Philosophy: textbook), available at: http://society.polbu.ru/alekseev_philosophy/ch44_all.html (accessed: 02.06.2015).
11. Ryabtsev, V.P. Prokurorskii nadzor: kurs lektsii (Prosecutor’s observation: course of lectures). Moscow: Norma, 2006, 288 p.
12. Karpov, N. N. Prokuratura: nadzor idi deyatel'nost' (Prosecutor’s office: observation or activity). Zakonnost', 2014, no. 8, p. 8.
13. Mazurenko, N.I., Strakhov, D.V. Problemy naznacheniya sudebnykh ekspertiz v ugolovnom protsesse (Issues of establishing court expertises in the criminal procedure). Vestnik advokatskoi palaty RT, 2014, no. 7, p. 38.
 


Citation :

 Burganov B.R. Systemic-institutional approach to solving the problems of prejudgement in the criminal court procedure, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2015, No. 3, pp. 230–237.
 


Type of article : The scientific article

Date of receipt of the article :
13.04.2015

Date of adoption of the print :
10.07.2015

Date of online accommodation :
15.10.2015