по-русски

Actual Problems of
Economics and Law

 

16+

 

DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.10.2016.2.192-216

скачать PDF

Authors :
1. Oren Bar-Gill, Professor of Law and Economics
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

2. Omri Ben-Shahar, Professor of Law
The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA



Exit from contract


Objective: to study the procedure of exiting the contract, its costs and benefits.

Methods: statistical method, comparative analysis.

Results: free exit from contract is one of the most powerful tools for the consumer rights protection. The procedure frees consumers from bad deals and keeps businesses honest. Yet consumers often choose transactions with lock-in provisions, trading off exit rights for other perks. This article examines the costs and benefits of free exit, as compared to the lock-in alternative. According to the authors, the present regulation of exit penalties (in the USA) is poorly tailored to address concerns about lock-in, particularly in light of increasingly ubiquitous market-based solutions. The article also calls (regulatory) attention to loyalty rewards, which are shown to be as powerful as exit penalties, and equally detrimental.

Scientific novelty: the article reveals a paradoxical state of the law: exit regulations in the USA are used most where they are needed least. Termination penalties present an obvi­ous target for regulatory intervention, while loyalty programs seem benign, not warranting any regulatory attention.

Practical significance: the article is of interest for the Russian juridical science and law-making authorities, as in Russia the issue of exiting the contract is as topical as in the USA, and requires solution which would impair neither the rights of consumers nor the rights of the sellers of products and services.
 


Keywords :

Civil law; Contract; Loyalty programs; Early termination fees; Zero contract
 


Bibliography :

1. CFPB. 2013. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau – Program Summary by Budge Activity. URL: http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f2012/02/budget-in-brief. pdf
2. Campbell J. C., Jackson H. E., Madrian B., Tufano P. Consumer Financial Protection // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2011. Vol. 25. Pp. 91–114.
3. Bar-Gill O., Ben-Shahar O. Regulatory Techniques in the Consumer Protection: A Critique of European Consumer Contract Law // Common Market Law Rev. 2013. No. 50. Pp. 109–125 (Special Issue).
4. Chen B. X. T-Mobile to Cover Termination Fees for New Users // New York Times. 2014. 9 January.
5. Berry J. Bulking Up: The 2013 COLLOQUY Loyalty Census: Growth and Trends in U.S. Loyalty Program Activity. Colloquy. June 2013. URL: http:// www.colloquy.com/files/2013-COLLOQUY-Census-Talk-White-Paper.pdf
6. Cheng R. Verizon Unveils Edge, its Own Pricey Early Upgrade Plan. CNET. 2013. July 18. URL: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57594327-94/verizon- unveils-edge-its-own-pricey-early-upgrade-plan/
7. Farrell J., Klemperer P. Coordination and Lock-in: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects / In M. Armstrong, R. H. Porter (eds.) // Handbook of Industrial Organization. 2007. Vol. 3. Ch. 31. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland.
8. Bar-Gill O., Ben-Shahar O. No Contract? // University of Chicago Institute for Law and Economics Research Paper. No. 636. 2013. URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=2220271
9. Frank J. Dodging Reform: As Some Credit Card Abuses are Outlawed, New Ones Proliferate. Center for Responsible Lending, 2009.
10. Bar-Gill O. Seduction by Contract: Law, Economics and Psychology in Consumer Markets. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2012.
11. Becher Sh. I., Zarsky T. Z. Open Doors, Trap Doors, and the Law // Law & Contemporary Problems. 2011. No. 74. Pp. 63–90.
12. FCC. 2010. News Release, FCC Survey Confirms Consumers Experience Mobile Bill Shock and Confusion about Early Termination Fees. 26 May.
13. Aghion Ph., Bolton P. Contracts as Barriers to Entry // American Economic Review. 1987. Vol. 77. Pp. 388–401.
14. Cairns R. D., Galbraith J. Artificial Compatibility, Barriers to Entry, and Frequent Flyer Programs // Canadian Journal of Economics. 1990. No. 23. Pp. 807–816.
15. Lederman M. Are Frequent Flyer Programs a Cause of the Hub Premium // Journal of Economics and Management Strategy. 2008. Iss. 17. Pp. 35–66.
16. Caminal R., Claici A. Are Loyalty-Rewarding Pricing Schemes Anti-Competitive? // International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2007. Vol. 25. Pp. 657–674.
17. Grossman S. The Informational Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure about Product Quality // Journal of Law and Economics. 1981. No. 24. Pp. 461–483.
18. Aghion Ph., Hermalin B. Legal Restrictions on Private Contracts Can Enhance Efficiency // Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. No. 6 (2). Pp. 381–409.
19. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk // Econometrica. 1979. Vol. 47. Pp. 263–292.
20. Tuttle B. A Disloyalty Movement? Supermarkets and Customers Drop Loyalty Card Programs // Time. 2013. 11 July. URL: http://business.time.com/2013/07/11/ a-disloyalty-movement-supermarkets-and-customers-drop-loyalty-card-programs/
21. Weisse C. Get the Most from Stingier Loyalty Programs. CNN Money Magazine. 2013. 1 July. URL: http://money.cnn.com/2013/07/01/pf/loyalty-pro grams.moneymag/index.html
22. Bar-Gill O., Stone R. Mobile Misperceptions // Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. 2009. No. 23. Pp. 49–118.
23. NY Public Service Commission. 2010. PSC Expands
Consumer Protections. URL: https://www3.dps.ny.gov/pscweb/WebFileRoom.nsf/Web/03377F8CA5F90 142852577
FB00661E93/$File/pr10120.pdf?0penElement
24. Illinois Commerce Commission. 2014. Natural Gas Choice. URL: http://www.icc. illinois.gov/ags/consumereducation.aspx#s1
25. Ducey J. Protect Yourself before Joining­ a Health Club. ABC15 Arizona. 2014. 14 January. URL: www.abc15.com/
dpp/money/consumer/alerts/pro tect-yourself-before-joining-a-health-club
26. Bar-Gill O., Ben-Shahar O. Exit from Contract // Journal of Legal Analysis. 2014. Vol. 6. No. 1. Pp. 151–183.


Original publication: https://academic.oup.com/jla/article/6/1/151/2937230


Citation :

Russian version: Bar-Gill O., Ben-Shahar O. Exit from contract, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2016, vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 192–216.


Type of article : The scientific article

Date of receipt of the article :
18.03.2016

Date of adoption of the print :
30.04.2016

Date of online accommodation :
15.07.2016