скачать PDF
Authors : 1. Valeriy V. Lazarev,
Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Researcher of the Russian Federation, Professor of the Chair of Theory of State and Law
Moscow State Juridical University named after O. E. Kutafin
Perception of the judiciary law by the law-maker
Objective: to develop conceptual-theoretical provisions and scientific recommendations for the implementation of judiciary decisions in the legislation of the Russian Federation.
Methods: universal dialectic method of cognition, as well as the general scientific and private research methods based on it.
Results: the necessity to analyze the fundamental (precedent) judicial decisions for the possible implementation of the legal positions of courts into legislative acts. The problem is not confined to the perception of provisions created by the constitutional (charter) courts. The paper shows the main directions of future activities on the implementation idea. The operation of the Department is shown, which was created at the Institute for Legislation and Comparative Law at the Government of the Russian Federation, entrusted with the relevant functions.
Scientific novelty: the mechanism of implementation of judiciary decisions in the Russian legislation has been developed and introduced into scientific circulation.
Practical significance: the findings of this paper can be used in scientific, legislative and law-enforcement activities, and the educational process of institutions of higher education.
Keywords :
Theory and history of state and law; Natural law; Positive law; Communication; Integrative approach; Court; Judicial decision; Implementation; Legal positions; Precedent; Monitoring; Innovation; Source of law; Improvement of legislation
Bibliography :
1. Gadzhiev, G. A. Ontologija prava (kriticheskoe issledovanie juridicheskogo koncepta dejstvitel'nosti) (Ontology of law (critical research of the juridical concept of reality)), Moscow: Norma, NIC INFRA-M, 2014. 320 p. (in Russ.).
2. Kleandrov, M. I. Konstitucija Rossijskoj Federacii i sistemnye problemy sudebnoj vlasti (Constitution of the Russian Federation and systemic problems of judiciary power), Rossijskoe pravosudie, 2014, No. 2, p. 6 (in Russ.).
3. Lazarev, V. V. Uchet reshenij Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii v zakonodatel'noj dejatel'nosti (Account of the Russian Constitutional Court’s decisions in legislative activity), Problemy ispolnenija federal'nymi organami gosudarstvennoj vlasti i organami gosudarstvennoj vlasti sub''ektov Rossijskoj Federacii reshenij Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii i konstitucionnyh (ustavnyh) sudov sub''ektov Rossijskoj Federacii (Issues of executing the Russian Constitutional Court’s decisions and the Russian subjects’ constitutional (charter) courts’ decisions by the Russian federal state and subjects’ authorities), Moscow: Formula prava, 2001, pp. 91–100 (in Russ.).
4. Lazarev, V. V. Rossijskij parlament kak adresat reshenij Konstitucionnogo Suda (Russian Parliament as the addressee of the Constitutional Court’s decisions), Parlamentarizm: problemy teorii, istorii, praktiki: sb. nauchnyh statej k 60-letiju zasluzhennogo jurista RF, doktora juridicheskih nauk, professora Isakova Vladimira Borisovicha (Parliamentarism: problems of theory, history, practice: collection of scientific works to the 60th anniversary of an Honored Lawyer of Russia, Doctor of Law, Professor Isakov Vladimir Borisovich), Moscow: Jurlitinform, 2010, pp. 54–65 (in Russ.).
5. Bernam, U. Pravovaja sistema SShA (Legal system of the USA), is. 3, Moscow: Novaja justicija, 2006, 1216 p. (in Russ.).
6. Jerlih, O. Osnovopolozhenie sociologii prava (Principles of the sociology of law), Saint Petersburg: Universitetskij izdatel'skij konsorcium, 2011, 704 p. (in Russ.).
7. Zor'kin, V. Pravo v uslovijah global'nyh peremen (Law under global changes), available at: http://rapsinews.ru/international_publication/20130515/267367948.html (access date: 20.02.2016) (in Russ.).
8. Bondar', N. S. Sudebnyj konstitucionalizm v Rossii v svete konstitucionnogo pravosudija (Court constitutionalism in Russia in the light of constitutional justice), Moscow: Norma; INFRA-M, 2011, 544 p. (in Russ.).
9. Guk, P. A. Normotvorcheskaja funkcija vysshih sudebnyh organov Rossii (Norm-making function of the higher court bodies in Russia), Pravovoe gosudarstvo i pravosudie: problemy teorii i praktiki: materialy VIII Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konferencii 15–19 aprelja 2013 g. (Legal state and justice: problems of theory and practice: works of the 8th International scientific-practical conference 15–19 April, 2013), Moscow: RAP, 2014, p. 512–513 (in Russ.).
10. Hajek, F. Pravo, zakonodatel'stvo i svoboda: Sovremennoe ponimanie liberal'nyh principov spravedlivosti i politiki (Law, legislation and freedom: Modern interpretation of liberal principles of justice and policy), Moscow: IRISJeN, 2006, 644 p. (in Russ.).
11. Mal'ko, A. V. Sud kak sub''ekt pravovoj politiki (Court as a subject of legal policy), Moscow: Jurlitinform, 2014, 232 p. (in Russ.).
12. Lazarev, V. V. Izbrannye trudy (Selected works), in 3 v., vol. I: Zakon. Zakonnost'. Primenenie zakona (Law. Order. Implementation of law), Moscow: Novaja justicija, 2010, 648 p. (in Russ.).
13. Lazarev, V. V. Ogranichenie prav i svobod kak teoreticheskaja i prakticheskaja problema (Limitation of rights and freedoms as theoretical and practical problem), Zhurnal rossijskogo prava, 2009, No. 9, p. 45 (in Russ.).
14. Jamshanov, B. Oshibka v zakone (Mistake in law), Rossijskaja gazeta, 2007, No. 275, 7 dekabrja (in Russ.).
15. Lazarev, V. V. Rol' Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii v ustanovlenii i preodolenii oshibok zakonodatelja (Role of Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in ascertainment and elimination of law-maker’s mistakes), Pravotvorcheskie oshibki: ponjatie, vidy, praktika i tehnika ustranenija v postsovetskih gosudarstvah: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. kruglogo stola (29–30 maja 2008 g.) (Law-making mistakes: notion, types, practice and technique of elimination in the post-Soviet states: works of International scientific-practical Round table (29–30 May, 2008)), Moscow: Prospekt, 2008, 1115 p. (in Russ.).
16. Bruno, L. Svoboda i zakon (Freedom and law), Moscow: IRISJeN, 2008, 312 p. (in Russ.).
17. Isaev, I. A. Vlast' i zakon v kontekste irracional'nogo (Power and law in the context of irrational), Moscow: Jurist, 2006, 478 p. (in Russ.).
18. Jampol'skij, M. Fiziologija simvolicheskogo (Phisiology of the symbolic). B. 1: Vozvrashhenie Leviafana (Return of Leviathan), Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2004, 800 p. (in Russ.).
19. Kravic, V. Juridicheskaja kommunikacija v sovremennyh pravovyh sistemah (teoretiko-pravovaja perspektiva) (Juridical communication in the modern legal systems (theoretical-legal prospective)), Pravovedenie, 2011, No. 5, p. 18 (in Russ.).
20. Lazarev, V. V. Prava cheloveka i prava grazhdanina: dialektika otnoshenij (Rights of a human and rights of a citizen: dialectics of relationships), Novaja justicija. Zhurnal sudebnyh precedentov, 2009, No. 1 (in Russ.).
21. Rabinovich, P. M. Vstupitel'noe slovo (Foreword), Neklassicheskaja filosofija prava: voprosy i otvety (Non-classical philosophy of law: questions and answers), Har'kov: Tarasenko V. P., 2013, 272 p. (in Russ.).
22. Lazarev V. V. Istorija politicheskih i pravovyh uchenij (History of political and legal doctrines), Moscow, 2008, 917 p. (in Russ.).
23. Romanov, I. Estestvennye prava (Natural rights), available at: http://confuz.ru/plugins/p2_news/printarticle.php?p2_articleid=733 (access date: 20.02.16) (in Russ.).
24. Gobbs, T. Leviafan (Leviathan), Gobbs, T. Izbrannye proizvedenija (Selected works), in 2 v., vol. 2, Moscow, 1964 (in Russ.).
Citation :
Lazarev V. V. Perception of the judiciary law by the law-maker, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2016, vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 158–169.
Type of article : The scientific article
Date of receipt of the article :
21.02.2016
Date of adoption of the print :
25.04.2016
Date of online accommodation :
15.07.2016
