Economics and national economy management; Public-private partnership (PPP); Public policy; Infrastructure; Project
1. How effective is public infrastructure investment in supporting COVID-19 economic recovery efforts? Global Infrastructure Hub, available at: https://www.gihub.org/infrastructure-monitor/insights/fiscal-multiplier-effect-of-infrastructure-investment/ (access date: 29.03.2021).
2. Boardman A., Vining A. Assessing the economic worth of public-private partnerships, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2010, 28 p.
3. Savas E. Privatization and Public Private Partnerships, N. Y., Chatham House Publishers, 2000, 79 p.
4. Grimsey D., Lewis M. K. Public Private Partnerships: The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Project Finance, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, EdwardElgar, 2004, 25 p.
5. Delmon J. Private Sector Investment in Infrastructure: Project Finance, PPP Projects and Risk, The World Bank and Kluwer Law International, 2010, 7 p.
6. Varnavskii V. G. Public-private partnership, Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2009, 14 p. (in Russ.).
7. Neto D. de C. e S., Cruz C. O., Rodrigues F., Silva P. Bibliometric Analysis of PPP and PFI Literature: Overview of 25 Years of Research, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2016, Vol. 142, Is. 10, p. 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001163
8. Bennett J., Iossa E. Building and managing facilities for public services, J. Public Econ., 2006, No. 90 (10), pp. 2143–2160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.04.001
9. Meda F. A game theory approach for the allocation of risks in transport public private partnerships, Int. J. Project Manage, 2007, No. 25 (3), pp. 213–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.06.003
10. Cruz C. O., Marques R. C. Exogenous determinants for renegotiating public infrastructure concessions: Evidence from Portugal, J. Constr. Eng. Manage, 2013, Vol. 139, Is. 9, pp. 1082–1090. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000710
11. Whitfield D. PPP Wealth Machine: UK and Global trends in trading project ownership, European Services Strategy Unit, 2012, No. 6, p. 48, available at: http://www.european-services-strategy.org.uk/ppp-database/ppp-equity-database/ppp-wealthmachine-parts-1-8.pdf (access date: 29.03.2021).
12. World Bank Group Support to Public-Private Partnerships: Lessons from Experience in Client Countries. FY2002-12, Independent Evaluation Group (IEG), 2014, 121 p., available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/405891468334813110/pdf/93629-REVISED-Box394822B-PUBLIC.pdf (access date: 29.03.2021).
13. Hall D. Why Public-Private Partnerships don’t work: The many advantages of the public alternative, London, PSIRU, 2015, 37 p., available at: http://www.world-psi.org/sites/default/files/rapport_eng_56pages_a4_lr.pdf (access date: 29.03.2021).
14. Benchmarking PPP Procurement: Assessing Government Capability to prepare, Procure and Manage PPPs. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank, 2016, 23 p.
15. Procuring Infrastructure Public-Private Partnerships Report 2018. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank, pp. 27, 29, 30.
16. PPP Policy, Legal and Institutional Frameworks in Asia and the Pacific. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, 2015, p. 3.
17. Establishing the PPP Framework, PPP KNOWLEDGE LAB, available at: https://pppknowledgelab.org/guide/sections/5-establishing-the-ppp-framework (access date: 29.03.2021).
18. Farquharson et al. How to Engage with the Private Sector in Public-Private Partnerships in Emerging Markets. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank, 2011, available at: https://ppiaf.org/documents/16 (access date: 29.03.2021).
19. Yong H. K. Public-Private Partnerships Policy and Practice: a Reference Guide, 2010, 139 p., available at: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/commonwealth/governance/public-private-partnerships-policy-and-practice_9781848590694-en#page139 (access date: 29.03.2021).
20. Ashley B. et al. Handbook for Evaluating Infrastructure Regulatory Systems, Washington, DC, World Bank, 2006, 78 p.
21. Eberhard A. Matching Regulatory Design to Country Circumstances: The Potential of Hybrid and Transitional Models, Gridlines Note 23, PPIAF, Washington, DC, May, 2007, 139 p.
22. Apurva S. et al. Designing and Using Public-Private Partnership Units in Infrastructure: Lessons from Case Studies around the World. Gridlines Note 27, PPIAF, Washington, DC. 2007. 89 p.
23. Bonhage J., Mueller H. The Public-Private Partnership Law Review: Germany, available at: https://thelawreviews.co.uk/title/the-public-private-partnership-law-review/germany (access date: 29.03.2021).
24. Investments into infrastructure and PPP in 2020. Analytical review, ANO "Natsional'nyi tsentr GChP", p. 5 (in Russ.).
25. Vaissier F.-G. et al. The Public-Private Partnership Law Review: France, available at: https://thelawreviews.co.uk/title/the-public-private-partnership-law-review/france (access date: 29.03.2021).
26. On the public-private partnership development in the Russian Federation: informational-analytical review, Ministerstvo ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 02.2020, pp. 4–5 (in Russ.).
27. Review of the European PPP Market for 2019, The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC), available at: https://www.eib.org/en/publications/epec-market-update-2019 (access date: 29.03.2021).
28. On the National PPP Center, available at: https://pppcenter.ru/o-tsentre/ (access date: 29.03.2021).
29. Saussier S., Phuong Tra Tran P.T. The Efficiency of Public-Private Partnerships in France: An Initial Quantitative Evaluation, Revue d'économie industrielle, 2012/4 (No. 81), pp. 81–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.5480
30. Müller B. The Development of a National PPP Unit: the German Experience. Regional Conference on Concessions and Public-Private Partnerships, Zagreb, 3–4 December 2009, available at: http://www.sigmaweb.org/publicationsdocuments/44406329.pdf (access date: 29.03.2021).
31. Schäfer M., Rethmann L. Öffentlich-Private Daseinsvorsorge (ÖPD) und Öffentlich-Private Partnerschaften (ÖPP): Gemeinsamkeiten und grundlegende Unterschiede, In: Öffentlich-Private Daseinsvorsorge (ÖPD) in Deutschland. essentials, Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, 2020, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31100-1_2 (access date: 21.05.2021).
32. Promoting People first Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) for the UN SDGs, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, July 2016, available at: https://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Promoting-People-first-Public-Private-Partnerships-PPPs-for-the-UN-SDGs_UNECE_IATF-Issue-Brief.pdf (access date: 29.03.2021).
33. Guidelines in the sphere of public-private partnerships for the good of people and n support of the UNO Goals for sustainable development, European Economy Commission, Geneva, 25–27 March 2019, available at: http://staging2.unece.org.net4all.ch/fileadmin/DAM/ceci/ppp/Standards/ECE_CECI_2019_05-ru.pdf (access date: 29.03.2021).
Merzlov I. Yu. Institutional bases of public-private partnership development, Russian Journal of Economics and Law, 2021, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 455–472 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2021.3.455-472