по-русски

Actual Problems of
Economics and Law

 

16+

 

DOI: 10.21202/2782-2923.2021.3.440-454

скачать PDF

Authors :
1. Elena V. Maslyukova, Associate Professor of the Economics Faculty
South Federal University

2. Darya I. Mokrousova,
South Federal University

3. Mariya A. Pokusaenko, post-graduate student of the Economics Faculty
South Federal University



Precarization of the youth’s employment in the context of COVID-19 pandemic consequences


Objective: to assess the impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) on the youth labor market in the context of the spread of precarization processes in employment.
 
Methods: qualitative methods were used to analyze labor market institutions, together with in-depth interviews and interpretative analysis of actors’ discourses.
 
Results: the COVID-2019 pandemic posed new challenges to the economy and contributed to the active development of new employment formats and employer-employee interaction in the form of informal employment, freelance platforms, and precariat development. The article considers the features and risks of informal and non-standard employment. Based on the labor market analysis, we determined the impact of the pandemic on working conditions, inequality growth and the increasing role of the informal sector. The impact of the crisis on employment conditions for young people with higher education is particularly emphasized. To form the models of students’ behavior under the conditions of labor market instability, the authors conducted in-depth interviews with students and graduates of the Southern Federal University to assess the employment opportunities of university graduates. The characteristics of respondents’ perception of the processes associated with precarization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic consequences are clarified and specified.
 
Scientific novelty: it consists in the development of theoretical and methodological approaches to the analysis of precarization of youth employment in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic consequences. It is shown that the observed increase of employment precarization is associated with behavioral features caused by dominant behavioral models and distortions in the perception of unstable employment by university graduates in relation to the structural opportunities provided by the labor market.
 
Practical significance: the identified features of employment of the Russian university graduates can be used to develop recommendations for improving the system for monitoring the employment precarization level in the regional labor markets.

Keywords :
Economics and national economy management; Labor market; University graduates; Precariat; Employment; Pandemic; COVID-19

Bibliography :
1. Maslyukova E. V., Maskaev A. I. Perception of state policy in the sphere of youth employment in the context of graduates’ precarization, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2020, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 771–782 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.4.771-782
2. Volchik V. V., Maslyukova E. V. Employment Insecurity and Behavioral Preferences of University Graduates, Journal of Institutional Studies, 2020, No. 12 (4), pp. 112–125 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2020.12.4.112-125
3. Han C. Precarity, precariousness, and vulnerability, Annual Review of Anthropology, 2018, No. 47, pp. 331–343.
4. Volchik V., Posukhova O. Precarity and professional identity in the context of institutional change, Terra Economicus, 2016, No. 14 (2), pp. 159–173 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2016-14-2-159-173
5. Posukhova O. Yu., Maskaev A. I. Precarity of Megapolis and Professional Identity in the Context of Tacit Knowledge, Journal of Institutional Studies, 2016, No. 8 (4), pp. 92–105 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2016.8.4.092-105
6. Finnegan F., Valadas S., О'Neill J., Fragoso А., Paulos L. The search for security in precarious times: non-traditional graduates perspectives on higher education and employment, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 2019, No. 38 (2), pp. 157–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2019.1567613
7. Kiersztyn A. Non-standard employment and subjective insecurity: how can we capture job precarity using survey data?, Precarious Work, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2017, pp. 91–122.
8. Standing G. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class, London, Bloomsbury, 2011.
9. Gasyukova E. N., Karacharovskii V. V., Yastrebov G. A. Different precariat: on the sources and forms of instability of the social status of individuals and groups, Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2016, No. 3, pp. 48–63 (in Russ.).
10. Toshchenko Zh. T. Precariat – a new phenomenon in the labor market, Yadov’s readings: prospects of sociology: collection of scientific reports of the conference, Saint Petersburg, 14–16 December 2015, eds. O. B. Bozhkova, S. S. Yaroshenko, V. Yu. Bocharova, Saint Petersburg, Eidos, 2016, pp. 182–191 (in Russ.).
11. Balsiger P., Bodet M. A., Brugidou M., Cartron D., Delon M., Dodeigne J., van Meter K. Why a special issue on ‘precarity’?, Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, 2020, No. 147–148 (1–2), pp. 8–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106320939885a
12. Fedorova A. E., Parsyukevich A. M. Precarization of employment and its influence on the social-economic welfare of the hired personnel, Izvestiya UrGEU, 2013, No. 5 (49), p. 76 (in Russ.).
13. Katashinskikh V. S., Mukhametshina K. O., Fedorova A. E. Gender features of employment precarization, Strategies of development of social communities, institutions, and territories, Vol. 1, Ekaterinburg, 2015, p. 198 (in Russ.).
14. Fedorova A., Vishnevskii I., Dvorakova Z. Evaluation of the organizational influence on physical and psychosocial health at work, 8th International Days of Statistics and Economics. Prague, September 11–13, 2014. P. 395.
15. Kreshpaj B., Orellana C., Burström B., Davis L., Hemmingsson T., Johansson G., Bodin T. What is precarious employment? A systematic review of definitions and operationalizations from quantitative and qualitative studies, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 2020, No. 46 (3), pp. 235–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3875
16. Loustaunau L., Stepick L., Scott E., Petrucci L., Henifin M. No Choice but to Be Essential: Expanding Dimensions of Precarity During COVID-19, Sociological Perspectives, 2021, April 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07311214211005491
17. Von Wachter T. Lost generations: long-term effects of the COVID-19 crisis on job losers and labour market entrants, and options for policy, Fiscal Studies, 2020, No. 41 (3), pp. 549–590.
18. Byrne S., Coates D., Keenan E., McIndoe-Calder T. The initial labour market impact of COVID-19, Central Bank Economic Letter, 2020, No. 4.
19. Bulletin of International Labor Organization (ILO): COVID-19 and labor sphere. Issue 4, 27 May 2020 (in Russ.).
20. OECD Employment Outlook 2020: Worker Security and the COVID-19 Crisis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/1686c758-en
21. O’Higgins N. The challenge of youth unemployment, International Social Security Review, 1997, No. 50 (4), pp. 63–93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-246x.1997.tb01084.x
22. Demidova O., Marelli E., Signorelli M. Youth labour market performances in the Russian and Italian regions, Economic Systems, 2015, No. 39 (1), pp. 43–58.
23. Bessant J. Young precariat and a new work order? A case for historical sociology, Journal of Youth Studies, 2018, No. 21 (6), pp. 780–798. DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2017.1420762
24. Lazar S., Sanchez A. Understanding labour politics in an age of precarity, Dialectical Anthropology, 2019, No. 43 (1), pp. 3–14.
25. Liotti G. Labour market flexibility, economic crisis and youth unemployment in Italy, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2020, No. 54, pp. 150–162.
26. OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus. Youth and COVID-19: Response, Recovery and Resilience, available at: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=134_134356-ud5kox3g26&title=Youth-and-COVID-19-Response-Recovery-and-Resilience (access date: 25.06.2020).
27. ILOSTAT, ILO Modelled estimates, November 2019.
28. What frightens most when searching for a job: polling results, HeadHunter, 2020, available at: https://rostov.hh.ru/article/27424 (access date: 25.06.2020) (in Russ.)
29. COVID-19 leads to dramatic unemployment, young people suffer the most, available at: https://news.cgtn.com/news/2020-05-29/COVID-19-leads-to-dramatic-unemployment-young-people-suffer-the-most-QSUcPNPJ0Q/index.html (access date: 23.06.2020).
30. Kramer A., Kramer K. Z. The potential impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility, 2020.
31. Klyachko T. L., Loginov D. M., Lomteva E. V., Semionova E. A. Youth employment and its features during a pandemic, Monitoring ekonomicheskoi situatsii v Rossii. Tendentsii i vyzovy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya, 2020, No. 28 (130), pp. 18–21 (in Russ.).
32. Gasiukova E., Korotaev S. Precarity in Russia: attitudes, work and life experience of young adults with higher education, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2019, Vol. 39, No. 7/8, pp. 506–520.

Citation :
Maslyukova E. V., Mokrousova D. I., Pokusaenko M. A. Precarization of the youth’s employment in the context of COVID-19 pandemic consequences, Russian Journal of Economics and Law, 2021, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 440–454 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2021.3.440-454

Type of article : The scientific article

Date of receipt of the article :
26.05.2021

Date of adoption of the print :
20.07.2021

Date of online accommodation :
25.09.2021