DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.4.870-890

скачать PDF

---

Conciliation Versus Mediation of Complaints Against Police: Lessons from the Queensland Experience

---

Objective: to analyze the dispute resolution practices for dealing with citizen-initiated complaints against police in Queensland, Australia.

Methods: dialectical approach to cognition of social phenomena, allowing to analyze them in historical development and functioning in the context of the totality of objective and subjective factors, which predetermined the choice of the following research methods: formal-logical, comparative-legal, and sociological.

 

Results: since the 1990s, alternative dispute resolution practices for dealing with citizen-initiated complaints against police, such as conciliation, have progressively been trialed and implemented in police services across Australia. The Queensland Police Service was one of the most proactive services in trialing independently facilitated complaints mediation programs – in collaboration with its oversight agency. However, despite repeated positive outcomes, the Service refrained from actively using mediation, preferring instead to use management dominated informal resolution (conciliation). This process, characterized by police investigating police, continues to limit complainant participation by denying them the opportunity to meet faceto-face with the subject officer. Yet the literature cites mediation, especially practices based on restorative principles as beneficial because it brings disputing parties together in dialogue that is educative for both parties, reparatory, and better satisfies complainants’ aspirations for an inclusive and neutral complaints system, while data from mediated complaints can also be used to inform police conduct improvement strategies. Complaints mediation is available upon request within the Queensland Police Service, however, it is not widely promoted, and is internally facilitated.

Scientific novelty: this article presents an historical account of the application of mediation and conciliation to the Queensland Police Service complaints system. The authors answer the question why conciliation has become the default approach and mediation continues to be largely ignored. This is done through a qualitative analysis of publicly available documents and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. The findings reveal that the 1992 Mediation Pilot was very successful. However, the Queensland Police Service adopted conciliation because it was cheaper and, they claim, better aligned with managing behavioral improvements. Three decades on, there has been little evidence of this, while the literature clearly shows that mediation should be a key component of any police complaints and discipline system. The findings reveal that the 1992 Mediation Pilot was very successful. However, the Queensland Police Service adopted conciliation because it was cheaper and, they claim, better aligned with managing behavioral improvements. Three decades on, there has been little evidence of this, while the literature clearly shows that mediation should be a key component of any police complaints and discipline system.

Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in scientific, pedagogical and law enforcement activities when considering issues related to the citizens’ claims on the actions of law enforcers.

Keywords :

Informal resolution of conflict; Conciliation procedures; Mediation; Police; Claims; Restoration justice

Bibliography :

1. Goldsmith A. J. Informal resolution of police complaints in Australia: Building better understanding or mere bureaucratic convenience, Law in Context, 2000, No. 17 (1), pp. 34–58.
2. Riley M., Prenzler T., McKillop N. Alternative dispute resolution and mediation of complaints against police in Australia and New Zealand, Police Practice and Research, International Journal, 2018, No. 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2018.1500284
3. Australian Law Reform Commission, Police accountability, 2018, Summary No. 14.49, available at: https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/pathways-to-justice-inquiry-into-the-incarceration-rate-of-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-peoples-alrc-report-133/14-police-accountability/complaints-against-police/
4. Ede A. Barnes M. Making the response fit the complaint: Alternative strategies for resolving complaints against police, Research & Issues Paper, Series 1, 2002, available at: https://www.ccc.qld.gov.au/sites/default/files/Docs/Publications/CMC/Bulletins%2Cseries-and- discussion-papers/Research-and-issues-paper- series/Research-and-Issues-Making-the- response-fit-thecomplaint-2002.pdf
5. Schaible L. M., De Angelis J., Wolf B., Rosenthal R. Denver’s citizen/police complaint mediation program: Officer and complainant satisfaction, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2012, No. 24 (5), pp. 626–650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403412455327

6. Bartels E. C., Silverman E. B. An exploratory study of the New York City Civilian Complaint Review Board mediation program, International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 2005, No. 28 (4), pp. 619–630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510510628703
7. Young R., Hoyle C., Cooper K., Hill R. Informal resolution of the complaints against the police: A quasi-experimental test of restorative justice, Criminal Justice, 2005, No. 5 (3), pp. 279–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14668025050558377
8. Maguire M., Corbett C. A study of the police complaints system, Her Majesty's Stationary Office, 1991.
9. Productivity Commission. Report on government services (Chapter 6, Police Services, 6.16), Australian Government Productivity Commission, 2018, available at: https://www.pc.gov.au/research/...government.../police.../rogs-2018-partc-chapter6.pdf
10. Prenzler T. Police corruption: Preventing misconduct and maintaining integrity, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 2009.
11. Crime and Misconduct Commission, Handling complaints against Queensland police: past, present and future, 2004, August, No. 2, available at: https://www.ccc.qld.gov.au/sites/default/files/Docs/Publications/CMC/Bulletins%2Cseries-and-discussionpapers/Monitoring-integritv-in-the-queensland-police-service/Handling-complaints-against-qld-police-Report-2004.pdf
12. Fitzgerald G. E. Commission of inquiry into possible illegal activities and associated police misconduct, Queensland, Crime and Corruption Commission, 1989, available at: https://www.ccc.qld.gov.au/sites/default/files/Docs/Publications/CCC/The-Fitzgerald-Inquiry-Report-1989.pdf
13. Sunshine J., Tyler T. R. The role of procedural justice in shaping public support for policing, Law & Society Review, 2003, No. 37, pp. 513–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
14. Wells W., Schafer J. A. Police scepticism of citizen oversight: Officers’ attitudes toward specific functions, processes, and outcomes, Journal of Crime and Justice, 2007, No. 30 (20), pp. 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2007.9721233
15. De Angelis J., Kupchik A. Citizen oversight, procedural justice, and officer perceptions of the complaint investigation process, International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 2007, No. 30 (4), pp. 656–671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510710833929
16. Queensland Police Service, Complaints management policy, 2016, May 24, QPS Headquarters, Brisbane, Queensland: Queensland Police Service.
17. Schulenberg J. L., Chenier A., Buffone S., Wojciechowski C. An application of procedural justice to stakeholder perspectives: Examining police legitimacy and public trust in police complaints systems, Policing and Society, 2015, No. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2015.1102252
18. Goldsmith A. J. Complaints against the police: A ‘community policing’ perspective, In S. McKillop, J. Vernon (eds.), The police and the community in the 1990s: Conference proceedings, 1990 (pp. 205–218), Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
19. Holland R. C. Dealing with complaints against the police: The resolution process adopted by the Queensland Police Service, Australia, Police Studies, 1996, No. 19 (2), pp. 45–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13639519610123172
20. Walker S., Archbold C., Herbst L. Mediating citizen complaints against police officers: A guide for police and community leaders. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, 2002, available at: http://restorativeiustice.org/am- site/media/mediating-citizen-complaints-against-police-officers.pdf
21. Hill R., Cooper K., Young R. P., Hoyle C. Meeting expectations: The application of restorative justice to the police complaint process, Oxford University Centre for Criminological Research, 2003.
22. Waters I., Brown K. Police complaints and the complainants’ experience, British Journal of Criminology, 2000, No. 40 (4), pp. 617–638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bic/40.4.617
23. Proctor J. L., Rosenthal R., Clemmons A. J. Denver’s citizen/police complaint mediation program: A comprehensive evaluation, 2008.
24. Office of the Independent Police Monitor, City of New Orleans. Community-police mediation program: annual report, 2018, available at: http://nolaipm. gov/annual-reports/.
25. Holmberg L. In service of the truth? An evaluation of the Danish Independent Police Complaints Authority, European Journal of Criminology, 2019, No. 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819856514
26. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1992 year book, available at: https://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/free.nsf/0/2415DAD15B7F1E7FCA257AFE001471C4/$File/13013%20-Qld%20YrBook%20-%201992.pdf
27. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Queensland population (1387.3 – Queensland in review, 2003), available at: https://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/CF3424B58ECB69C8CA256CC500211FCA
28. Criminal Justice Commission, 1991–1992 annual report of the Criminal Justice Commission, 1992, available at: https://www.ccc.qld.gov.au/publications/cic-annual-report-1991-1992
29. Queensland Government Statistician’s Office, Queensland population, 2020, available at: https://www.qgso.qld.gov.au/statistics/theme/population/population-estimates/state-territories/qld- population-counter

30. Productivity Commission. Report on government services (Chapter 6: Police Services, 6.3), Australian Government Productivity Commission, 2019, available at: https://www.pc.gov.au/research/ongoing/report-on-government-services/2019/iustice/police-services
31. Geoscience Australia, Area of Australia – states and territories, Australian Government, 2020, available at: https://www.ga.gov.au/scientific-topics/national-location-information/dimensions/area-of-australia-states-and-territories
32. Queensland Police Service, 2018–2019 annual report of the Queensland Police Service, 2019, available at: https://www.police.qld.gov.au/index.php/qps- corporate-documents/reports-and- publications/annual-report-2018-2019.
33. Queensland Police Service, 2018, November 26 – Interviewees 1–4, Semi-structured interviews, QPS Headquarters, Brisbane, Queensland; 2019, July 27 – Interviewee 5, Semi-structured interview, Maroochydore, Queensland.
34. Hampshire Police Service. (2019, January 9 – Interviewee 6), Semi-structured interview (telephone), London, England.
35. Crime and Corruption Commission. (2018, June 14, 28 and July 11 – Interviewees 7–9). Semistructured interview (telephone
and in person), Brisbane, Queensland.
36. Dispute Resolution Branch. (2018, November 7 – Interviewees 10–11). Semi-structured interview, Brisbane, Queensland: Department of Justice and Attorney General.
37. Dispute Resolution Branch. (2019, June 24 – Interviewee 12). Semi-structured interview (email).
38. Criminal Justice Commission, 1992–1993 annual report of the Criminal Justice Commission (Mediation – Appendix 1, and Informal resolution – Appendix 2), 1993, available at: http://www.ccc.qld.gov.au/research-and- publications/research-andpublications-1
39. Criminal Justice Commission, Report on the pilot project for the mediation of complaints against police (February – August 1992), Legal Office, Criminal Justice Commission, Brisbane, Queensland, 1992.
40. Criminal Justice Commission, Informal complaint resolution in the Queensland Police Service: Follow-up evaluation (April 1996), Brisbane, Queensland, Criminal Justice Commission, Research and Co-ordination Division, 1996.
41. Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC), Accountability and leadership, 2019, available at: http://www.ccc.qld.gov.au/about-the-ccc/accountability-and-leadership/accountability-and-leadership
42. Criminal Justice Commission, Informal complaint resolution in the Queensland Police Service: A progress report (February, 1994), Brisbane, Queensland, Criminal Justice Commission, Research and Co-ordination Division, 1994, pp. 1–14.
43. Meadus D. Complaints against police officers in the Commonwealth of Australia, Hampshire Constabulary, 1988.
44. Criminal Justice Commission, 1993–1994 annual report of the Criminal Justice Commission, Processing of complaints, 1994, available at: http://www.ccc.qld.gov.au/research-and- publications/research-and-publications-1
45. Criminal Justice Commission, Informal complaint resolution in the Queensland Police Service: An evaluation (November, 1994), Brisbane, Queensland, Criminal Justice Commission, Research and Co-ordination Division, 1994.
46. Webbe S., Williams G., Grayson F. Simple effective transparent strong: An independent review of the Queensland Police complaints, discipline and misconduct system, Department of the Premier and Cabinet, Queensland Government, Independent Expert Panel, 2011, available at: https://cabinet.qld.gov.au/documents/2011/May/Police%20Discipline%20Review/Attachments/independent-review-of-qld-police-discipline-system.pdf
47. Crime and Misconduct Commission, Setting the standard: A review of current processes for the management of police discipline and misconduct matters, 2010, December, available at: https://www.ccc.qld.gov.au/sites/default/files/Docs/Publications/CMC/Setting-the-standard-2010.pdf
48. Queensland Police Service, Complaint resolution guidelines (Local Management Resolution Policy and Local Management Resolution Strategies – s. 3.2 General Information), QPS Headquarters, Brisbane, Queensland, Queensland Police Service, 2018.
49. Queensland Police Service, Compliments and complaints, 2018, available at: https://www.police.qld.gov.au/online/ComplimentsandComplaints.htm
50. Police Service Administration (Discipline Reform) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill, 2019, p. 4, available at: https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/pdf/asmade/act-2019-032
51. Los Angeles Police Department, 2017 annual report of the Los Angeles Police Department, 2018, available at: http://assets.lapdonline.org/assets/pdf/2017%20 Q4%20BP.pdf
52. Meadus D. Informal resolution, In K. Bryett, C. Lewis (eds.), Un-peeling tradition: Contemporary policing (pp. 107–122), Macmillan Education Australia, 1994.
53. Office of the Independent Police Monitor, Denver, 2007 annual report, Denver, Colorado, Office of the Independent Police Monitor, 2007.
54. Queensland Police Service, Policing Queensland timeline 1864–2014, 2020, available at: https://www.police.qld.gov.au/queensland-police-museum/policing-queensland-timeline-1864-2014

55. Queensland Government, Diversity figures snapshot, Census 2016, 2020, available at: https://www.dlgrma.qld.gov.au/resources/multic ultural/communities/diversity-flyer.pdf
56. Riley M., Prenzler T. Conciliation Versus Mediation of Complaints Against Police: Lessons from the Queensland Experience, Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 2020, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 22–38.

Citation :

Riley M., Prenzler T. Conciliation Versus Mediation of Complaints Against Police: Lessons from the Queensland Experience, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2020, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 870–890. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.4.870-890

Type of article : The scientific article

Date of receipt of the article :
16.09.2020

Date of adoption of the print :
20.10.2020

Date of online accommodation :
25.12.2020